Journals / Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey

Girişimcilik ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği

Pages
213–227
Publication Date
2017-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study, which suggests that entrepreneurship plays a key role in the explanation of economic growth, shows that entrepreneurship self employed has a positive and statistically significant effect on economic growth in the case of Turkey according to Johansen Cointegration test results based on VAR analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, it’s seen that theoretical and empirical literature on the relationship between entrepreneurship and economic growth has developed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Entrepreneurship can lead to growth of income and welfare development by accelerating the creation, dissemination and acceptance of new ideas, activating economic resources via new firm establishments, creating new employment areas, contributing to productivity growth through innovative practices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study, which suggests that entrepreneurship plays a key role in the explanation of economic growth, shows that entrepreneurship self employed has a positive and statistically significant effect on economic growth in the case of Turkey according to Johansen Cointegration test results based on VAR analysis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Girişimcilik · Ekonomik Büyüme · Serbest Meslek Sahipliği

Abstract

In recent years, it’s seen that theoretical and empirical literature on the relationship between entrepreneurship and economic growth has developed. Entrepreneurship can lead to growth of income and welfare development by accelerating the creation, dissemination and acceptance of new ideas, activating economic resources via new firm establishments, creating new employment areas, contributing to productivity growth through innovative practices. This study, which suggests that entrepreneurship plays a key role in the explanation of economic growth, shows that entrepreneurship self employed has a positive and statistically significant effect on economic growth in the case of Turkey according to Johansen Cointegration test results based on VAR analysis.

Özet

Son yıllarda girişimcilik ile ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi üzerine teorik ve amripik literatürün geliştiği görülmektedir. Girişimcilik yeni fikirlerin yaratılması, yayılması ve kabulünü hızlandırarak, yeni firma kurulumlarıyla ekonomik kaynakları harekete geçirerek, yeni istihdam alanları yaratarak, yenilikçi uygulamalarla verimlilik artışına katkı sağlayarak gelir ve refah artışına yol açabilmektedir. Ekonomik büyümenin açıklanmasında girişimciliğin temel bir rol üstlendiğini ileri süren bu çalışma, VAR analizine dayalı Johansen Eşbütünleşme testi sonuçlarına göre, Türkiye ekonomisi örneğinde girişimciliğin serbest meslek sahibi ekonomik büyümeyi pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir şekilde etkilediğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞIR, H., KARA, M. A. (2017). The Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 213–227. https://ajindex.com/articles/173834

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Acs, J.Z. and Storey, J.D., (2004), “Introduction: Entrepreneurship and Economic Development”, Regional Suties, 38(8): 871-877.
  2. Audretsch, D.B., (2004), “Sustaining Innovation and Growth: Public Policy Support for Entrepreneurship”, Industry and Innovation, 11(3): 167-191.
  3. Audretsch, D.B., (1995), Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pres. Audretsch, D.B. and Thurik, R., (2001), “Linking Entrepreneurship to Growth” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2001/2: 1-33.
  4. Audretsch, D.B. and Fritsch, M., (2002), “Growth Regimes over Time and Space”, Regional Studies, 36(2): 113-124.
  5. Audretsch, D.B. and Keilbach, M., (2004), “Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Performance”, Regional Studies, 38(8): 949-959.
  6. Audretsch, D.B. and Keilbach, M., (2008), “Resolving the Knowledge Paradox: Knowledge- Spillover Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth” Resarch Policy, 37: 1697-1705.
  7. Audretsch, D.B. Belitski, M. and Desai, S., (2015), “Entrepreneurship and Economic Development in Cities” Ann. Reg. Sci., 55: 33-60. Barro R. J. and Sala-I-Martin. X., (1995),
  8. Economic Growth. McGraw-Hill, New York. Berkowitz, D. and Dejong, D.N., (2005), “Entrepreneurship and Post-Socialist Growth” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(1): 25-46.
  9. Blanchflower, D.G., (2000), “Self- Employment in OECD Countries”, Labour Economics, 7: 471- 505. Box, M. Lin, X. and Gratzer, K., (2014), “ Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth in Sweden, 1850-2000.
  10. PESO Working Papers, School of Social Sciences, Södertörn Universty Braunerhjelm, P. and Borgman, B., (2004), “Geographical Concentration, Entrepreneurship and Regional Growth: Evidence from Regional Data in Sweden, 1975-99”, Regional Studies, 38(8): 929-947.
  11. Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D.B. and Carlsson, B., (2010), “The Missing Link: Knowledge Diffusion and Entrepreneurship in Endogenous Growth”, Small Business Economics, 34: 105-125.
  12. Callejon, M. and Segarra, A., (1999), “ Business Dynamics and Efficieny in Industries and Regions: The Case of Spain”, Small Business Economics, 13: 253-271.
  13. Carree, M.A. and Thurik, A.R., (2008), “The Lag Structure of the Impact of Business Ownership on Economic Performance in OECD Countries”, Small Business Economics, 30: 101-110.
  14. Carree, M.A. and Thurik, A.R., (2005), “The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth” in ACS, J. and Audretsch, D. B. (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Resarch, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  15. USA De Vita, G., Endresen, K. ve Hun