Journals / Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 4

Relationship of Export-Growth: An Analysis with Structural Breaks

İhracat-Büyüme İlişkisi: Yapısal Kırılmalı Bir Analiz

Pages
57–87
Publication Date
2013-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the empirical analysis; it was determined that 10% increases in export by 2.7%, 10% increases in fixed capital formation by 1.4%, 10% increases in labor by 2.9% and 10% increases in gross domestic product of the world by 0.6% increases the gross domestic product of Turkey, the effects of the increases in the real exchange rate on the gross domestic product is quite small

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study; the effects of exports on economic growth in Turkey were analyzed for 1989:Q1-2013:Q1 period’s data via the Toda-Yamamoto causality and cointegration with multi structural breaks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study; the effects of exports on economic growth in Turkey were analyzed for 1989:Q1-2013:Q1 period’s data via the Toda-Yamamoto causality and cointegration with multi structural breaks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the empirical analysis; it was determined that 10% increases in export by 2.7%, 10% increases in fixed capital formation by 1.4%, 10% increases in labor by 2.9% and 10% increases in gross domestic product of the world by 0.6% increases the gross domestic product of Turkey, the effects of the increases in the real exchange rate on the gross domestic product is quite small
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:hracat Öncüllü Büyüme Hipotezi · Yap sal K ve Eúbütünleúme Testleri · Toda-Yamamoto Nedensellik Analizi.

Abstract

In this study; the effects of exports on economic growth in Turkey were analyzed for 1989:Q1-2013:Q1 period’s data via the Toda-Yamamoto causality and cointegration with multi structural breaks. As a result of the empirical analysis; it was determined that 10% increases in export by 2.7%, 10% increases in fixed capital formation by 1.4%, 10% increases in labor by 2.9% and 10% increases in gross domestic product of the world by 0.6% increases the gross domestic product of Turkey, the effects of the increases in the real exchange rate on the gross domestic product is quite small

Özet

Bu çalışmada; Türkiye’de ihracatın ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkileri 1989:Q1-2013:Q1 dönemi için Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik analizi ve çoklu yapısal kırılmalı eşbütünleşme yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan ampirik analizler sonucunda; ihracattaki %10’luk artışın milli geliri %2.7, sabit sermaye yatırımlarındaki %10’luk artışın milli geliri %1.4, işgücündeki %10’luk artışın milli geliri %2.9 ve dünya milli gelirindeki %10’luk artışın milli geliri %0.6 oranında arttırdığı, reel döviz kurundaki artışın milli gelir üzerindeki etkisinin ise oldukça küçük olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖÇER, İ., HEPKARŞI, N. (2013). Relationship of Export-Growth: An Analysis with Structural Breaks. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 4, 57–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/173808

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abou-Stait F. (2005), “Are Exports the Engine of Economic Growth? An Application of Cointegration and Causality Analysis for Egypt, 1977- 2003”,
  2. Economic Research, Working Paper No.76. ayev, S. (2011), “ hracat ve Ekonomik Büyüme ili kisi: 12 Geçi Ekonomisi Örne inde Panel E bütünle me ve Panel Nedensellik Analizleri”, Ege Akademik Bak, 11(2), 241-254.
  3. Ahmad, J. ve Harnhirun, S. (1995), “Unit Roots and Cointegration in Estimating Causality Between Exports and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from the ASEAN Countries”, Economics Letters, 49, 329-334.
  4. Ahmad, J. (2001), “Causality between Exports and Economic Growth: What Do the Econometric Studies Tell Us?” Pacific Economic Review, 6(1) Alam, H. (2011), “Econometric Analysis of Export-Led Growth Hypothesis: Reflections from Pakistan”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 2(12), 329-341.
  5. Alimi, S. R. ve Muse, B. (2013), “Export - Led Growth or Growth – Driven Exports? Evidence from Nigeria”, British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 3(2), 89-100.
  6. Al-Yousif, Y. (1997), “Exports and Economic Growth: Some Empirical Evidence from the Arab Gulf Countries”, Applied Economics, 29, 693- 697. Alt nta, H. ve Çetinta, H. (2010), “Türkiye’de Ekonomik Büyüme, Be eri Sermaye ve hracat Aras ndaki li kilerin Ekonometrik Analizi: 1970- 2007”, Erciyes Üniversitesi ktisadi ve dari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 33-56.
  7. Anoruo, E. (2000), “Exports And Economic Growth: An Error Correction Model”, Department of Management Science and Economics, Coppin State College, macroeconometrics4r.pdf, [31.07.2013]. http://coin.wne.uw.edu.pl/~lgoczek/pdf/
  8. Bayrak, M. ve Kanca, O.C. (2013), “Türkiye’de 1970-2011 Y llar Aras nda Olu an Ekonomik ve Siyasi Geli melerin Seyri”, Akademik Bak Dergisi, 35, 1-20.
  9. Blecker, R.A. ve Razmi, A. (2009), “Export-Led Growth, Real Exchange Rates and the Fallacy of Composition”, RePEc Working Paper, No. 22. Berg, A. ve Kruger, A. (2003), “Trade, Growth, and Poverty: A Selective Survey”, http://www.internationalmonetaryfund.com/external/ pubs/ft/wp/2003/wp0330.pdf, [13.08.2013].
  10. Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L. ve Sanso, A. (2006), “Testing the Null of Cointegration with Structural Breaks”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68(5), 623-646.
  11. Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L., Kim, D ve Perron, P. (2009), “GLS-Based Unit Root Tests with Multiple Structural Breaks Under Both the Null and the Alternative Hypotheses”, Econometric Theory, 25, 1754-1792.
  12. Castiglione, C. (2011), “Ver