SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Ownership Structure and Effect of Export Intensity on Firms’ Profit

Sahiplik Yapısı ve İhracat Yoğunluğunun İşletmelerin Karları Üzerindeki Etkisi

Hakan TUNAHAN
Sinan ESEN
Bayram TOPAL
Pages
93–109
Publication Date
2015-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analyses show that while the companies having high export intensity and the local companies get lower profit; the companies having low export intensity and the foreign owned and mixed local - foreign-owned ones- get higher profit

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to analyse the profit of companies exporting at different levels and having different ownership structures over the data of Top 1000 Exporter Survey for the Year 2012 of Turkish Exporters Assembly TIM by performing ANOVA and Chi-square Test.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to analyse the profit of companies exporting at different levels and having different ownership structures over the data of Top 1000 Exporter Survey for the Year 2012 of Turkish Exporters Assembly TIM by performing ANOVA and Chi-square Test.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analyses show that while the companies having high export intensity and the local companies get lower profit; the companies having low export intensity and the foreign owned and mixed local - foreign-owned ones- get higher profit
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İhracat · İhracat Yoğunluğu · Yabancı Sermayeli İşletme

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the profit of companies exporting at different levels and having different ownership structures over the data of Top 1000 Exporter Survey for the Year 2012 of Turkish Exporters Assembly TIM by performing ANOVA and Chi-square Test. Analyses show that while the companies having high export intensity and the local companies get lower profit; the companies having low export intensity and the foreign owned and mixed local - foreign-owned ones- get higher profit

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye İhracatçılar Meclisi'nin TİM 2012 Yılı İlk 1000 İhracatçı Araştırması’nın verilerini kullanarak, farklı düzeylerde yurtdışı satış yapan ve farklı sahiplik yapılarına sahip olan firmaların karlarının, Anova ve Ki-Kare ile analizini amaçlamaktadır. Analizler, yüksek ihracat yoğunluğu olan şirketler ile yerli sermayeli şirketlerin karlılığının düşük, düşük ihracat yoğunluğuna sahip firmalar ile yabancı ve karma yerli - yabancı sermayeli firmaların karlılığının ise yüksek olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNAHAN, H., ESEN, S., TOPAL, B. (2015). Ownership Structure and Effect of Export Intensity on Firms’ Profit. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 93–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/173769

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abor, Joshua (2011). “Do Export Status and Export Intensity Increase Firm Performance”, Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol:53, No:1, ss: 9-18.
  2. Talaat, Abdel–Malek (1974), “Foreign Ownership and Export Performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, Autumn, ss: 1-14.
  3. Ahmed, S. and Rock, J. (2012), “Exploring The Relationship Between Export İntensity And Exporter Characteristics, Resources, And Capabilities: Evidence From Chile”, Latin American Business Review, 13, ss: 29-57.
  4. Atıcı, Gonca ve Güner Gürsoy (2013), “Foreign Ownership and Export Orientation: Evidence From Turkey”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol: October, Issue:115, ss: 8-21.
  5. Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property, NewYork: Harcourt, Brace & World. Bernard, A. B., J. Bradford Jensen and Robert Z. Lawrence (1995), “Exporters, Jobs and Wages in US Manufacturing: 1976–1987”,
  6. Papers on Economic Activity, Brookings, Microeconomics, ss: 67–119.
  7. Cole, Matthew, Robert Elliott and Supreeya Virakul (2010), “Firm Heterogeneity, Origin of Ownership and Export Participation”, World Economy, Vol:33, Issue:2, ss:264-291
  8. Demsetz, H. (1983), “The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm”, Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), ss: 375–390.
  9. Filatotchev, Igor, Johannes Stephan and Björn Jindra (2008), “Ownership Structure, Strategic Controls and Export Intensity of Foreign-Invested Firms in Transition Economies”, Journal of International Business Studies 39, ss: 1133-1148.
  10. Fryges, Helmut and Joachim Wagner (2010), “Exports and Profitability: First Evidence for German Manufacturing Firms”, The World Economy, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., ss:399-423.
  11. Grazzi, Marco (2012), “Export and Firm Performance: Evidence on Productivity and Profitability of Italian Companies”, J IndCompetTrade, Vol:12, ss:413-444.
  12. Girma, Sourafel, Holger Görg and Eric Strobl (2004), “Exports, International Investment and Plant Performance: Evidence From a Non-Parametric Test”, Economic Letters, Vol:83, ss:317-324.
  13. Jongwanich, Juthathip ve Archanun Kohpaiboon (2008), “Export Performance, Foreign Ownership and Trade Policy Regime: Evidence from Thai Manufacturing”, ADB Economics Working Paper Series, No:140. Kneller, Richard ve Mauro Pisu (2004), “Export Oriented FDI in the UK”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol.20, No:3, ss:424-439.
  14. Kneller, Richard and Mauro Pisu (2010). “TheReturns to Exporting: Evidence from UK Firms”, Canadian Jou