Journals / Harita Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 77 - Sayı: 146

Implementation of comprehensive modeling technigues on kartogen generalization software

Kartogen genelleştirme yazılımında kapsamlı modelleme tekniklerinin kullanımı

Pages
37–45
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Throughout the software several generalization algorithms are developed and an overall modeling is performed containing where, when and how to use and control these algorithms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper describes the implementation of three main modeling techniques namely condition-action , human interaction and constraint based model on KartoGen (KG) Generalization Software designed and developed by the Cartography Department of General Command of Mapping.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Throughout the software several generalization algorithms are developed and an overall modeling is performed containing where, when and how to use and control these algorithms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This satisfactory experience in text generalization encourages us to implement constraint based modeling techniques to building and transportation generalization.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper describes the implementation of three main modeling techniques namely condition-action , human interaction and constraint based model on KartoGen (KG) Generalization Software designed and developed by the Cartography Department of General Command of Mapping. Throughout the software several generalization algorithms are developed and an overall modeling is performed containing where, when and how to use and control these algorithms. After comparing the three modeling techniques, we concluded that each model should be used in different parts of the generalization process to achieve desirable solutions. Especially, preliminary results in text generalization reveal that constraint based model highly reduces the human interactivity and leads the automation of the generalization processes to a promising level. This satisfactory experience in text generalization encourages us to implement constraint based modeling techniques to building and transportation generalization.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, kapsamlı modelleme tekniklerinden; koşul-eylem (condition-action), insan etkileşimli (human interaction) ve kısıt tabanlı (constraint based) modeller ve bu modellerin Harita Genel Komutanlığı (HGK) Kartografya Şubesi tarafından tasarlanarak geliştirilen KartoGen (KG) Genelleştirme yazılımındaki uygulamalarından bahsedilmiştir. Birçok yeni algoritma kullanılarak geliştirilen KG yazılımı, bu algoritmaların nasıl, ne zaman ve nerede kullanılacağı konularını içeren kapsamlı modelleme teknikleri ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu modelleme tekniklerinin karşılaştırması ile her bir modellin farklı genelleştirme süreçlerinde tatmin edici çözümler ürettiği sonucuna varılmıştır. Özellikle yazı genelleştirmesinde elde edilen ilk sonuçlar, kısıt tabanlı modellemenin insan etkileşimini oldukça azalttığını ortaya koymuş ve otomatik genelleştirme sürecini umut verici seviyeye getirdiği gözlemlenmiştir. Yazı genelleştirmesinde elde edilen bu tecrübe, bina ve ulaşım genelleştirme süreçlerinde de bu modeli uygulamak için cesaretlendirmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SİMAV, Ö., ASLAN, S., ÇOBANKAYA, O. N. (2011). Implementation of comprehensive modeling technigues on kartogen generalization software. Harita Dergisi, Cilt: 77 - Sayı: 146, 37–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/172783

References (5)

  1. AGENT, 1998, Constraint analysis. Technical report, Agent Consortium. Aslan, S., Çetinkaya, B., Ilgın, D.E., Yıldırım, A., 2004, Some intermediate results of KartoGen Generalization Project in HGK, ICA/EuroSDR Workshop on Generalisation and Multiple Representation, Leicester, UK, August 19-22.
  2. Burghardt, D., Schmid, S. ve Stoter, J., 2007, Investigations on cartographic constraint formalization, Workshop of the ICA Commission on Generalization and Multiple Representation, August, Moscow. Filippovska, Y., Walter, V., Fritsch, D., 2008, Quality evaluation of generalization algorithms, ISPRS Beijing. Harrie, L., Weibel, R., 2007, Generalization of Geographic Information:Cartographic Modelling and Applicatons, Elsevier, p. 67- 87 Haunert, J-H. ve Sester, M., 2008, Assuring logical consistency and semantic accuracy in map generalization, Photogrammetrie - Fernerkundung – Geoinformation (PFG), vol. 2008, no. 3, p. 165-173. Mackaness W.A. ve Ruas A., 2007, Generalization of Geographic Information:Cartographic Modelling and Applicatons, Elsevier, p. 89-111
  3. McMaster, R.B. ve Shea K.S., 1992, Generalization in digital cartography. Association of American Geographers: Resource Publications in Geography. Washington, D.C. Podolskaya, E.S., K.-H. Anders, Haunert, J-H., Sester, M, 2008., Quality Assessment for Polygon Generalization, Quality Aspects in Spatial Data Mining, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, p. 211-220
  4. Schmid, S., 2008., Automated Constraınt- Based Evaluatıon of Cartographıc Generalızatıon Solutıons, Master Thesis, University of Zurih, Switzerland Weibel, R., 1991, Amplified intelligence and rule-based systems, Map Generalization: Making Rules for Knowledge Representation, pages 172–186.
  5. Longman, London.