Journals / Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

CAN THE GREEN ECONOMY BE A SOLUTION FOR THE ECOLOGICAL CRISIS?

YEŞİL EKONOMİ EKOLOJİK KRİZE ÇÖZÜM OLABİLİR Mİ?

Pages
1–19
Publication Date
2019-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it can not be a solution for the ecological crisis

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There has been a widespread consensus on deepening ecological crisis since the early 1970s during which the world economy started to show signals of world economic crisis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ecological crisis is not independent of economic crisis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it can not be a solution for the ecological crisis
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeşil Ekonomi · Küresel Yeni Yeşil Düzen · Dünya Ekonomik Krizi

Abstract

There has been a widespread consensus on deepening ecological crisis since the early 1970s during which the world economy started to show signals of world economic crisis. Ecological crisis is not independent of economic crisis. As economic crisis deepens, we have been witnessing acceleration in commodification of new facets of nature. Moreover, the approach of incorporation of all life forms and eco systems into the price mechanism is launched with an “environmentalist” discourse as green economy by the prestigious international institutions. They argued in their various reports that there is a harmonious relationship between growth and protection of environment. In this paper it is argued that green economy provides a new field for profitable investments. Thus, ecological crisis deepens instead of being solved. Behind the green economy argument there is not environmental considerations, instead it is seen as a new field for profitable investment opportunities to overcome the economic crisis. Therefore, it can not be a solution for the ecological crisis

Özet

Dünyada ekonomik kriz belirtilerinin ortaya çıkmaya başladığı 1970’li yıllardan beri giderek derinleşen bir ekolojik kriz olduğu konusunda geniş bir görüşbirliği vardır. Ekolojik kriz ekonomik krizden bağımsız değildir. Ekonomik kriz derinleştikçe doğanın farklı boyutlarının metalaşmasının hızlandığına tanık olunmaktadır. Bunun da ötesinde, bütün yaşam formlarının ve ekosistemlerin fiyat mekanizmasına içerilmesi yaklaşımı, “çevreci” bir söylemle yeşil ekonomi olarak uluslararası prestijli kuruluşlarca dolaşıma sokulmuştur. Bu kuruluşlar, değişik raporlarında büyüme ve çevre koruması arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişki olduğunu öne sürmektedirler. Bu çalışmada yeşil ekonominin karlı yatırım fırsatları sunan yeni bir alan olduğu iddia edilmektedir. Dolayısıyla ekolojik kriz çözümleneceğine derinleşmektedir. Yeşil ekonomi tezinin ardında çevreyle ilgili endişelerden çok krizi aşmak için yeni ve karlı yatırım fırsatları sunan bir alan olarak görülmesi yatmaktadır. Dolayısıyla yeşil ekonomi ekolojik krize çare olamaz.

🔖

Cite This Article

PURKİS, S. (2019). CAN THE GREEN ECONOMY BE A SOLUTION FOR THE ECOLOGICAL CRISIS?. Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 1–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/170656

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bracking, S. (2015). ”Performativity in the Green Economy: How Far Does Climate Finance Create Fictive Economy?”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 12: 2337–2357.
  2. Brunnengraber, A. (2007). “The Political Economy of the Kyoto Protocol” Socialist Register, Vo. 43: 213-230.
  3. BUKO (2012). Ten Theses of a Critique of the Green Economy, Bundeskoordination Internationalismus. http://rio20.net/en/documentos/ten-theses-of-a-critique-of-the-green- economy/, (Erişim:19.08.2019).
  4. Daly, H. (2007). Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development, Selected Essays of Herman Daly, Edward Edgard, Cheltenham ve Northampton. Eckstein, D., Hutfils, L. and Winges M. (2019). Global Climate Risk Index Briefing Paper, Berlin: GermanWatch. file:///E:/financialisation%20of%20nature/Global%20Climate%20Risk%20Index %202019_2.pdf, (Erişim: 27.08.2019).
  5. GND Group (2008). A Green New Deal, https://neweconomics.org/uploads/files/8f737ea195fe56db2f_xbm6ihwb1 pdf, (Erişim: 13.08.2019).
  6. GSR (2019).
  7. Global Status Report, Renewables 2019 (REN21). https://www.ren21.net/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/gsr_2019_full_report _en.pdf(Erişim: 21.08.2019).
  8. Harvey, D. (1981). The Urban Process Under Capitalism: A Framework for Analysis. In: Michael D., Scott A. S. (Eds.). Urbanisation and Urban Planning in Capitalist Society, Methuen Co.&Ltd., London, 116-121.
  9. Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism Oxford University Press,
  10. New York. Harvey, D. (2016). Crisis Theory and the Falling Rate of Profit. In: The Great Financial Meltdown: Systemic, Conjunctural or Policy Created?, Turan Subaşat. Cheltenham (Ed.), Edward Elgar Publishing, UK • Northampton, MA, USA, 37-54.
  11. IISD (2019). (International Institute for Sustainable Development, Fossil Fuel to Clean Energy) Subsidy Swaps: How to Pay for an Energy Revolution. Richard Bridle, https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/fossil-fuel-clean- energy-subsidy-swap.pdf, (Erişim: 05.09.2019).
  12. Anna Geddes IMF (2019).
  13. IMF Working Paper, Global Fossil Fuel Subsidies Remain Large: An Update Based on Country-Level Estimates, David Coady, Ian Parry, Nghia- Piotr Le, and Baoping Shang. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2019/05/02/Global Fossil-Fuel-Subsidies-Remain-Large-An-Update-Based-on-Country- Level-Estimates-46509, (Erişim: 08.09.2019).
  14. Lohmann L. (2005). “Marketing and Making Carbon Dumps: Commodification Calculation and Counterfactuals in Climate Change Mitigation”. Science as Culture, Vol. 14, No. 3: 203-235. Lohm