SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

The effectiveness of the decision-making process and strategic consensus

Karar Verme Sürecinin Etkililiği ve Stratejik Uzlaşı

Senem BESLER
Pages
89–108
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results taken from the 32 top management team indicated that the consensus level for the objectives of the investigated companies is found low on half of them.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The success of businesses depends on manager's decision making process and managing these processes effectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the dynamics is strategic consensus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results taken from the 32 top management team indicated that the consensus level for the objectives of the investigated companies is found low on half of them.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The success of businesses depends on manager's decision making process and managing these processes effectively. Managers have to consider some dynamics which have effects on decision making process. One of the dynamics is strategic consensus. The aim of this study is defining strategic consensus concept and investigating the relationship between consensus and decision making and organizational performance. Concurrently in this study, the level of strategic consensus of top management teams is investigated for the companies which take place on ISO Top 100 Industrial Company Index. Results taken from the 32 top management team indicated that the consensus level for the objectives of the investigated companies is found low on half of them.

Özet

İşletmelerin başarısı, yöneticilerin karar verme süreçlerine ve bu süreçlerin etkili bir şekilde yönetilmesine bağlıdır. Yöneticilerin, karar verme süreçleri üzerinde etkili olan bir takım dinamikleri göz önünde bulundurmaları gereklidir. Bu dinamiklerden biri de stratejik uzlaşıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, stratejik uzlaşı kavramına açıklık getirmek ve uzlaşının karar verme süreci ile örgütsel performans arasındaki ilişkisini ortaya koyabilmektir. Aynı zamanda bu çalışmada, İSO'nun belirlediği ilk 100 Büyük Sanayi Kuruluşu içinde yer alan işletmelerin üst yönetim ekiplerinin stratejik uzlaşı konusunda ne düzeyde yer aldıkları da araştırılmıştır. 32 üst yönetim ekibinden elde edilen sonuçlar, hedefler konusunda uzlaşı düzeyinin kapsamdaki işletmelerin yarısında düşük olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BESLER, S. (2009). The effectiveness of the decision-making process and strategic consensus. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 89–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/169509

References (14)

  1. Bowman, C. - Ambrosini, V. (1997), “Perceptions of Strategic Priorities, Consensus, and Firm Performance”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, No: 2, p. 241-258.
  2. Bourgeois, L. J. (1980), “Performance and Consensus”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 1, No: 3, p. 227-248.
  3. Bourgeois, L. J. (1985). “Strategic Goals, Perceived Uncertainty, and Economic Performance in Volatile Environments”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, No: 3, p. 548-573.
  4. Cyert, R. M. - March, J. G. (1963),
  5. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Dess, G. G. (1983), “Consensus in The Strategy Formulation Process”, Academy of Management Proceedings, p. 22-26.
  6. Dess, G. G. (1987), “Consensus on Strategy Formulation and Organizational Performance: Competitors in A Fragmented Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 8, No: 3, p. 259-277.
  7. Dooley, R. S. -Fryxell, G. E. - Judge, W. Q. (2000), “Belaboring The Not-So-Obvious: Consensus, Commitment, and Strategy. Implementation Speed and Success”, Journal of Management, Vol. 31, No: 4, p. 737-770.
  8. Finkelstein, S. - Hambrick, D. C. (1996), Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations, West Publishing, St. Paul, MN. Floyd, S. W. - Wooldridge, B. (1992), “Managing Strategic Consensus: The Foundation of Effective Implementation”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 6, No: 4, p. 27-39.
  9. Ford, J. D. - Baucus, D. A. (1987), “Organizational Adaptation to Performance Downturns: an Interpretation- Based Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12, p. 366-380.
  10. Hambrick, D. C. - Cho, T. S. - Chen, M. (1996), “The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves”, Administrative Science Quarterly, No: 41, p. 659-684.
  11. Hitt, M. A. - Tyler, B. B. (1991), “Strategic Decision Models: Integrating Different Perspectives”, Strategic Management Journal, No: 12, p. 327-351.
  12. Hrebiniak, L. G. - Snow, C. C. (1982), “Top Management Agreement and Organizational Performance”, Human Relations, Vol. 35, No: 12, p. 1139-1158.
  13. Ireland, R. D. - Hitt, M. A. - Bettis, R. A. - Porras, D. A. (1987), “Strategy Formulation Processes: Differences in Perceptions of Strength and Weaknesses Indicators and Environmental Uncertainty by Management Level”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 8, No: 5, p. 469-486.
  14. Kellermanns, F. W. - Walter, J. - Lechner, C. - Floyd, S. W. (2005), “The Lack of Consensus about Strategic Consensus: Advancing Theory and Research”, Journal of Management, Vol. 31,