Journals / Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16

THE ORIGIN, DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF PUBLIC DEBTS

DEVLET BORÇLARININ KÖKENİ, GELİŞİMİ VE İKTİSADİ TEMELLERİ

Pages
279–305
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We also investigated the importance of public debt interms of state, individual and community.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The public debt have come from many stages and have been fed from many sources of religion, philosophy, and economics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hence while the Physiocrats and Classics had a more conservative stance on debt, Mercantlist and some authors, many of whom are German economists, had adopted a more moderate attitude towards government borrowing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We also investigated the importance of public debt interms of state, individual and community.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Devlet Borcu · Devlet Borcunun Temeli · Faiz İçeren Borçlanma

Abstract

The public debt have come from many stages and have been fed from many sources of religion, philosophy, and economics. It was first dealt with in the context of interest within the framework of religious and philosophical currents, due to the awareness of the negative effect of debt on the economic life, the evaluations on the public debts focused on economic effects of them. Especially with the Glorious Revolution in England, the concept of state debt has begun to include features that are accepted in the modern economic system. Hence while the Physiocrats and Classics had a more conservative stance on debt, Mercantlist and some authors, many of whom are German economists, had adopted a more moderate attitude towards government borrowing. In this study, which is called the origin, development and economic foundations of publıc debts, we focused on public debt transformations and its economic nature. We also investigated the importance of public debt interms of state, individual and community.

Özet

Devlet borçları, birçok aşamadan geçmiş ve dini, felsefi ve iktisadi kaynaklardan beslenmiştir. Kavram, ilk olarak dini ve felsefi akımlar çerçevesinde faiz yasağı bünyesinde ele alınmış ve borcun iktisadi hayat üzerindeki etkisinin görülmesi neticesinde, devlet borcu kavramına dair değerlendirmeler borcun iktisadi etkileri etrafında şekillenmiştir. Özellikle İngiltere’deki Muhteşem Devrim ile birlikte devlet borcu kavramı, modern iktisadi sistemde kabul gören özellikleri ihtivâ etmeye başlamış ve iktisadi düşünce okulları mensupları, dönemin koşullarından ve geçmiş tecrübelerden faydalanarak bu konuda fikir beyan etmişlerdir. Bu minvalde Fizyokratlar ve Klasik iktisatçılar devlet borçları konusunda muhafazakâr bir tutum sergilerlerken Merkantilistler ile çoğunluğunu Alman iktisatçıların oluşturduğu bir kısım yazar, devlet borçlarına karşı ılımlı bir tavır takınmışlardır. Devlet borçlarının kökeni, gelişimi ve iktisadi temelleri adını taşıyan bu çalışmada, devlet borçlarının dönüşümü, ekonomik niteliği ve borçlanmanın devlet, birey ve toplum açısından önemi ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDEMİR, T., YEŞİLYURT, Ş. (2018). THE ORIGIN, DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF PUBLIC DEBTS. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16, 279–305. https://ajindex.com/articles/169382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alcouffe, A., Poettinger, M. ve Bertram, S. (2017). Business Cycles in Economic Thought: A History. Routledge. Andreau, J. (2012). Endettement Privé et Abolition Des Dettes Dans la Rome Antique. Novembre, http://www.cadtm.org/spip.php?page=imprimer&id_article=8544, (Erişim Tarihi: 10 Şubat 2017)
  2. Bastable, C. F. (1892). Public Finance. London: Macmillan and Co., Limited. Bullock, C. J. (1920). Selected Readings in Public Finance. Second Edition,
  3. Ginn and Company. Carcanholo, M. D. (2017). Marx(ism) and Public Debt: Thoughts on the Political Economy of Public Debt. Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory, 45(3), 303-317.
  4. Cecchetti, S. G., ve Schoenholtz, K. L. (2015).
  5. Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. 4th Edition,
  6. McGraw-Hill Education. Davanzati, G. F. ve Patalano, R. (2017). Marx on Public Debt: Fiscal Expropriation and Capital Reproduction, International Journal of Political Economy, 46(1), 50-64.
  7. Davenant, C. (1710). An Essay Upon the National Credit of England: Introductory to a Proposal Prepared for Establishing the Public Credit. London. Dyson, K. (2014).
  8. States, Debt, and Power: 'Saints' and 'Sinners' in European History and Integrtion. Oxford University Press,
  9. Oxford. Ferguson, N. (2006). The Cash Nexus Money and Power in The Modern World, 1700-2000.
  10. Published by Basic Books, New York. Fratianni, M., ve Spinelli, F. (2006). Italian City-States and Financial Evolution. European Review of Economic History. Cambridge University Press, Sayı 10. 257–278.
  11. Fryde, E. B. ve Fryde, M. M. (1965). Public Credit, with Special Reference to North-Western Europe, in: The Cambridge Economic History of Europe (Volume III Economic Organization and Policies in The Middle Ages). Ed: M. M. Postan, E. E. Rich and Edward Miller, Cambridge Universıty Press,
  12. Graeber, D. (2011). Debt: The First 5,000 Years. New York: Melville House Publishing. Hamilton, E. J. (1947). Origin and Growth of the National Debt in Western Europe, The American Economic Review. 37(2), 118-130. Papers and Proceedings of the Fiftyninth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association. Hansen, A. H. (1945). Fiscal Policy and Business Cycles. Asia Publishing House, 35-138.
  13. Holtfrerich, C. L. (2013). Public Debt in Post-1850 German Economic Thought vis-a-vis the Pre-1850 British Classical School. German Economic Review, 15(1), 62–83.
  14. Holtfrerich. C. L. (2014). Government Debt in Economic Thought of the Long 19th Century. School of Business & Economics, Discussion Paper: Economics, Freie Universität