Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Vitamin D Does Not Have Any Impact on Ovarian Reserve Markers in Infertile Women

Pages
79–83
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSIONS: There is no association between 25 (OH) D and ovarian reserve markers. 25 (OH) D levels were significantly correlated with body mass index, waist circumference and hip circumference parameters only in AOR group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential role of vitamin D on ovarian reserve markers in infertile women with different reserve patterns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 171 women were divided into three groups according to ovarian reserve patterns: (i) adequate ovarian reserve pattern (AOR, n=77), (ii) high ovarian reserve pattern (polycystic ovarian syndrome, n=62), and (iii) diminished ovarian reserve pat-tern (DOR, n=32).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSIONS: There is no association between 25 (OH) D and ovarian reserve markers. 25 (OH) D levels were significantly correlated with body mass index, waist circumference and hip circumference parameters only in AOR group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential role of vitamin D on ovarian reserve markers in infertile women with different reserve patterns. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective cross-sectional study included the infertile women attending the Hitit University Hospital. The initial examination included the measurements of waist circumference and hip circumference, body mass index, and waist/hip ratio. A total of 171 women were divided into three groups according to ovarian reserve patterns: (i) adequate ovarian reserve pattern (AOR, n=77), (ii) high ovarian reserve pattern (polycystic ovarian syndrome, n=62), and (iii) diminished ovarian reserve pat-tern (DOR, n=32). The serum estradiol (E2), follicle stimulating hormone, total testosterone, 17-hydroxy-progesterone (17 (OH) P), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, anti-mullerian hormone, and hydroxychole-calciferol (25 (OH) D) levels were analyzed. RESULTS: No significant difference between three different groups was detected in terms of body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist/hip ratio, E2 and 17OHP levels (p>0.05, for all). One-hundred-sixty-nine (98.2%) women in all groups had vitamin D concentration below 30 ng/mL as a cut-off value. The circulating 25 (OH) D levels did not show a significant difference between all ovarian reserve groups (p=0.804). No correlation between 25 (OH) D and anti-mullerian hormone levels was documented in women with AOR, polycystic ovarian syndrome and DOR patterns (r=-0.099 p=0.393, r=0.034 p=0.794 and r=0.157 p=0.390 respectively). 25 (OH) D levels were significantly correlated with body mass index, waist circumference and hip circumference parameters only in AOR group (r=-0.355 p=0.002, r=-0.305 p=0.007 and r=-0.322 p=0.004 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is no association between 25 (OH) D and ovarian reserve markers. 25 (OH) D levels were significantly correlated with body mass index, waist circumference and hip circumference parameters only in AOR group.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖRKEM, Ü., KUCUKLER, F. K., TOĞRUL, C., GÜLEN, Ş. (2017). Vitamin D Does Not Have Any Impact on Ovarian Reserve Markers in Infertile Women. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 79–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/167565

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Chavarro J, Rich-Edwards J, Rosner B, Willett W. A prospective study of dairy foods intake and anovulatory infertility. Hum Reprod 2007
  2. 22(5):1340-7. 27. Pearce K, Gleeson K, Tremellen K. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone production is not correlated with seasonal fluc-tuations of vitamin D status in ovulatory or PCOS women. Hum Reprod 2015
  3. 30(9):2171-7. 26. Ersoy E, Ersoy AO, Yildirim G, Buyukkagnici U, Tokmak A, Yilmaz N. Vitamin D levels in patients with premature ovarian failure. Ginekol Pol 2016
  4. 87(1):32-6 25. Lee MK, Yoon BK, Chung HY, Park HM. The serum vita-min D nutritional status and its relationship with skeletal status in Korean postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2011
  5. 54(3):241-6 24. Kebapcilar AG, Kulaksizoglu M, Kebapcilar L, Gonen MS, Unlü A, Topcu A, et al. Is there a link between pre-mature ovarian failure and serum concentrations of vita-min D, zinc, and copper? Menopause 2013
  6. 20(1):94-99. 23. Chang EM, Kim YS, Won HJ, Yoon TK, Lee WS. Association between sex steroids, ovarian reserve, and vi-tamin D levels in healthy nonobese women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014
  7. 99(7):2526-32. 22. Blomberg Jensen M. Vitamin D metabolism, sex hor-mones, and male reproductive function. Reproduction 2012
  8. 144(2):135-52. 21. Pagliardini L, Vigano P, Molgora M, Persico P, Salonia A, Vailati SH, et al. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in infertile women referring for assisted reproduction. Nutrients 2015
  9. 7(12):9972-84. 20. Hekimsoy Z, Dinç G, Kafesçiler S, Onur E, Güvenç Y, Pala T, et al. Vitamin D status among adults in the Aegean region of Turkey. BMC Public Health 2010
  10. Prentice A. Vitamin D deficiency: a global perspective. Nutr Rev 2008
  11. 66(10 Suppl 2):153-64. 18. Jukic AMZ, Steiner AZ, Baird DD. Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and ovarian reserve in pre-menopausal women. Menopause 2015
  12. 22(3):312-6. 17. Irani M, Minkoff H, Seifer DB, Merhi Z. Vitamin D in-creases serum levels of the soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products in women with PCOS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014
  13. 99(5):E886-90 16. Dennis NA, Houghton LA, Jones GT, van Rij AM, Mor-gan K, McLennan IS. The level of serum anti-mullerian hormone correlates with vitamin D status in men and women but not in boys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012
  14. 97(7):2450-5. 15. Ovarian reserve testing. Committee Opinion No. 618. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2015
  15. 125(1):268-73. 14. Goodman NF, Cobin RH, Futterweit W, Glueck JS, Legro RS, C