SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarih Okulu Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 26

Budget Rigidity of Built-Lease-Transfer Projects in Turkish Health Sector

BÜTÇE KATILIĞINA ETKİSİ AÇISINDAN TÜRK SAĞLIK SEKTÖRÜNDE YAP-KİRALA-DEVRET PROJELERİ

Ayhan SARISU
Pages
503–567
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, 'Built-Lease-Transfer' public-private partnership model which has been applied for the integrated health campuses in Turkey recently and their affects on budget expenditures in the future, arising from their contracts as 'a compulsory expenses' that strongly effects overall budget rigidity, emphasized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, 'Built-Lease-Transfer' public-private partnership model which has been applied for the integrated health campuses in Turkey recently and their affects on budget expenditures in the future, arising from their contracts as 'a compulsory expenses' that strongly effects overall budget rigidity, emphasized.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A scientific approach is taken up within a systematic, historical and legal unity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:New global and contemporary solutions for sectoral infrastructure investment's financing problems is considered
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, 'Built-Lease-Transfer' public-private partnership model which has been applied for the integrated health campuses in Turkey recently and their affects on budget expenditures in the future, arising from their contracts as 'a compulsory expenses' that strongly effects overall budget rigidity, emphasized. A scientific approach is taken up within a systematic, historical and legal unity. New global and contemporary solutions for sectoral infrastructure investment's financing problems is considered

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'de son dönemde entegre sağlık yerleşkelerinde uygulanan 'Yap-Kirala-Devret' kamu ve özel sektör işbirliği uygulama sözleşmelerinden kaynaklanan ve bütçe harcama kalemlerinde zorunlu (katı) harcamalar niteliğine sahip ödemeler nedeniyle önümüzdeki yıllarda karşılaşılması kuvvetle muhtemel genel bütçe katılığına olası etkiler sistematik, tarihi ve hukuki bütünlük içinde ele alınmıştır. Sektörel altyapı yatırımlarının finansman sorununa yeni çözümler geliştirilmesi için küresel gelişmelerin ve çağdaş çözümlerin önemine dikkat çekilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

SARISU, A. (2016). Budget Rigidity of Built-Lease-Transfer Projects in Turkish Health Sector. Tarih Okulu Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 26, 503–567. https://ajindex.com/articles/166896

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. AB KOMISYONU (2004). Yeşil Belge (Green Paper on Public Private Partnerships and Community Law on Public Contracts and Concessions- (Kamu-Özel İşbirlikleri ile ilgili Yeşil Belge ve Kamu İhaleleri ve İmtiyazlar Hakkındaki Topluluk Yasası) http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52005 DC0569 (E.T: 26.04.2016) ABD ULAŞTIRMA BAKANLIĞI-United States, Department of Transportation (2004). Report to Congress on Public-Private Partnerships, Aralık AKDAĞ, Recep (2013). TBMM Plan ve Bütçe Komisyonunun 15.01.2013 tarihli ve 1/722, 2/114 E., 28 K. Numaralı, 417 sıra no.lu Raporunda yer alan Sağlık Bakanı Recep Akdağ'ın açıklamaları. http://www. tbmm.gov.tr AKİNTOYE, Akintola & BECK, Matthias & HARDCASTLE, Cliff (Editörler) (2003). Public-Private Patnerships Managing Risks and Opportunities, Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd., İngiltere BAŞOL, Emel ve IŞIK, Abdülkadir (2015). Türkiye'de Sağlık Politikalarında Güncel Gelişmeler: Sağlıkta Dönüşüm Programından Günümüze Bazı Değerlendirme ve Öneriler, International Anatolia Academic Online Journal AAOJ, Social Science, 2(2), 1-26
  2. BAŞTÜRK, Meryem Filiz (2015). The Role of Fiscal Dominance on The Effectiveness of Monetary Policy: An Evaluation Of 2002-2012
  3. Period in Turkey, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, C:13, S:3 - Doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.11611/JMER587 BLÖNDAL, Jon R. (2005). Market-type Mechanisms and the Provision of Public Services, OECD Journal on Budgeting, Volume 5-No.1 BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS (1999). Public-Private Partnership-A Guide for Local Governments, Canada ÇEBİ, Cem (2015).
  4. Bütçe Harcama Katılığı, TCMB, Ekonomi Notları, S: 2015-23/17 Aralık, http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/8d89fe1e- 8d8c-4a76-9af0-15fd19bb7f03/en1523.pdf?MOD= AJPERES& CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE8d89fe1e-8d8c-4a76-9af0-15fd19bb7f03 (ET: 22.04.2016).
  5. DAVIES, Steve ve FAIRBROTHER, Peter (2003). PFI & PPPs: Definitions and Sources, Cardiff University, School of Social Sciences Working Paper Series, Paper 39, June EGGERS, William D. ve STARTUP, Tom (2006). Closing the Infrastructure Gap: The Role of Public-Private Partnerships, Deloitte Development LLC, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Araştırma Raporu, ABD ERBAŞ, Özgür, YAVUZ, IŞIK, Cavit ve BAYAZIT, İlhan (2012). Soru ve Yanıtlarla Sağlıkta Kamu Özel Ortaklığı, Ankara: TBB Yayını, s.14- 15. EU (1997). Resolution of the European Council on the Stability and Growth Pact, Amsterdam, 17.06.1997, 97/C236/01). http://europa.eu.int. smartapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg