SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bilig / 2026 / Sayı: 119

Strategic Regionalism in Turkish Foreign Policy: The Case of the Organization of Turkic States

Türk Dış Politikasında Stratejik Bölgeselleşme: Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı Örneği

Metin Yücekaya(ANKARA SOSYAL BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6095-3685
Muhittin Ataman(ANKARA SOSYAL BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4343-8283
Ömer Naim Küçük(ANKARA SOSYAL BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6255-3418
Mehmet Adanmış(ANKARA SOSYAL BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0006-6234-2913
Journal
Bilig
Pages
1–34
Publication Date
2026-10-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Secondly, with this hybrid regionalization model, Türkiye is pursuing a policy similar to that of other regional powers and middle powers, while at the same time producing a novel and ambitious policy in terms of motivations and objectives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The erosion of the Western-led international order and the resurgence of great power competition in the last decade have led to a more fragmented international system, rendering regional cooperation more significant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study offers an analytical framework by expanding the concept of strategic regionalism to address Türkiye’s growing interest in regional international organizations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Secondly, with this hybrid regionalization model, Türkiye is pursuing a policy similar to that of other regional powers and middle powers, while at the same time producing a novel and ambitious policy in terms of motivations and objectives.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Türk dış politikası · dış politika çeşitlendirmesi · uluslararası örgütler

Abstract

The erosion of the Western-led international order and the resurgence of great power competition in the last decade have led to a more fragmented international system, rendering regional cooperation more significant. This study offers an analytical framework by expanding the concept of strategic regionalism to address Türkiye’s growing interest in regional international organizations. Strategic regionalization is defined as a hybrid foreign policy strategy that integrates tools such as economic cooperation and identity proximity with high-politics goals. Accordingly, regional organizations are not merely platforms for economic integration; they also serve as tools to enhance the geopolitical interests of states and broaden the scope of global activity. The study employs two complementary methods. By employing a unique dataset covering Türkiye’s interactions with international organizations and the Organization of Turkic States as a case study, this study shows that, firstly, Türkiye assumed a facilitating role rather than a hegemonic or supportive leadership role in regional organizations, adopting an approach that prioritizes sovereign equality and consensus. Secondly, with this hybrid regionalization model, Türkiye is pursuing a policy similar to that of other regional powers and middle powers, while at the same time producing a novel and ambitious policy in terms of motivations and objectives.

Özet

Batı öncülüğündeki uluslararası düzenin aşınması ve son on yılda büyük güç rekabetinin yeniden yükselmesi, uluslararası sistemi daha parçalı hâle getirmiş ve bölgesel iş birliğini daha önemli kılmıştır. Bu çalışma, stratejik bölgeselcilik kavramını genişleterek Türkiye’nin bölgesel uluslararası örgütlere artan ilgisini açıklayan analitik bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Stratejik bölgeselleşme; ekonomik iş birliği ve kimlik yakınlığı gibi araçları yüksek politika hedefleriyle birleştiren hibrit bir dış politika stratejisi olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Buna göre bölgesel örgütler yalnızca ekonomik entegrasyon platformları değil, aynı zamanda devletlerin jeopolitik çıkarlarını güçlendiren ve küresel faaliyet alanlarını genişleten araçlar olarak işlev görmektedir. Çalışma birbirini tamamlayıcı iki yöntem kullanmaktadır. Türkiye’nin uluslararası örgütlerle etkileşimlerini kapsayan özgün bir veri setini ve bir örnek olay incelemesi olarak Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı’nı kullanan bu çalışma, ilk olarak Türkiye’nin bölgesel örgütlerde hegemonik veya destekleyici bir liderlik rolünden ziyade kolaylaştırıcı bir rol üstlendiğini; egemen eşitlik ve uzlaşıyı önceleyen bir yaklaşım benimsediğini göstermektedir. İkinci olarak Türkiye, bu hibrit bölgeselleşme modeliyle diğer bölgesel ve orta ölçekli güçlere benzer bir politika izlerken, motivasyonları ve hedefleri bakımından özgün ve iddialı bir strateji geliştirmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yücekaya, M., Ataman, M., Küçük, Ö. N., Adanmış, M. (2026). Strategic Regionalism in Turkish Foreign Policy: The Case of the Organization of Turkic States. Bilig, Sayı: 119, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9518

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Ağır, Osman, and Zehra Aksu. “Efforts for Energy-Based Regionalisation in the Turkic World: The Organization of Turkic States.” bilig, no. 109, 2024, pp. 105-128.
  2. Akıllı, Erman. “TURKSOY, Turkic Council and Cultural Diplomacy: Transactionalism Revisited.” bilig, no. 91, 2019, pp. 1-25.
  3. Altunışık, Meliha Benli. “The Trajectory of a Modified Middle Power: An Attempt to Make Sense of Turkey’s Foreign Policy in Its Centennial.” Turkish Studies, vol. 24, nos. 3-4, 2023, pp. 658-672.
  4. Aras, Bülent. “The Davutoğlu Era in Turkish Foreign Policy.” Insight Turkey, vol. 11, no. 3, 2009, pp. 127-142.
  5. Ataman, Muhittin, et al. “Türkiye’s Increased Activism in International Organizations as an Initiator State.” Insight Turkey, vol. 27, no. 1, 2025, pp. 87-112.
  6. Baghirov, Orkhan. “The Organization of Turkic States’ Economic Potential and Cooperation Prospects among Its Members.” Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, vol. 27, no. 1, 2022, pp. 53-73.
  7. Dal, Emel Parlar, and Ali Murat Kurşun. “Assessing Turkey’s Middle Power Foreign Policy in MIKTA: Goals, Means, and Impact.” International Journal, vol. 71, no. 4, 2016, pp. 608-629.
  8. Dosbolov, Abzal, and Göktuğ Sönmez. “The Organization of Turkic States and Postcolonialism in Central Asia: Possible Contributions, Prospects, and Limitations.” Insight Turkey, vol. 25, no. 4, 2023, pp. 91-133.
  9. Erşen, Emre. “The Return of Eurasianism in Turkey: Relations with Russia and Beyond.” Turkey’s Pivot to Eurasia: Geopolitics and Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order, eds. Emre Erşen, and Seçkin Köstem, Routledge, 2019, pp. 31-47.
  10. Ethier, Wilfred John. “The New Regionalism.” The Economic Journal, vol. 108, no. 449, 1998, pp. 1149-61.
  11. Gilson, Julie. “Strategic Regionalism in East Asia.” Review of International Studies, vol. 33, no. 1, 2007, pp. 145-63.
  12. Hettne, Björn. “Developmental Regionalism.” New Directions in Development Economics: Growth, Environmental Concerns and Government in the 1990s, ed. Mats Lundahl, and Benno J. Ndulu, Routledge, 1996, pp. 142-157.
  13. Hettne, Björn, and Fredrik Söderbaum. “The New Regionalism Approach.” Politeia, vol. 17, no. 3, 1998, pp. 6-21.
  14. Hettne, Björn, and Fredrik Söderbaum. “Theorising the Rise of Regionness.” New Political Economy, vol. 5, no. 3, 2000, pp. 457–72.
  15. Kahveci, Hayriye, and Işık Kuşçu Bonnenfant. “Turkish Foreign Policy towards Central Asia: An Unfolding of Regionalism and Soft Power.” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, vol. 12, no. 2, 2023, pp. 195-218.
  16. Kardaş, Şaban. “Charting the New Turkish Foreign Policy.” International Journal, vol. 67, no. 1, 2011, pp. 1-6.
  17. Kirişci, Kemal. “The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State.” New Perspectives on Turkey, no. 40, 2009, pp. 29-57.
  18. Kocaman, Ömer. Personal Interview with Deputy Secretary General of the Organization of Turkic States. 19 Dec. 2025.
  19. Koçak, Muhammet, and Musa Akgül. “Quest for Regional Power Status: Explaining Turkey’s Assertive Foreign Policy.” International Journal, vol. 77, no. 2, 2022, pp. 292-312.
  20. Köstem, Seçkin. “When Can Idea Entrepreneurs Influence Foreign Policy? Explaining the Rise of the ‘Turkic World’ in Turkish Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 13, no. 3, 2017, pp. 722-740.
  21. Kutlay, Mustafa, and Ziya Öniş. “Understanding Oscillations in Turkish Foreign Policy: Pathways to Unusual Middle Power Activism.” Third World Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 12, 2021, pp. 3051-3069.
  22. Luke, Douglas Alan. “Introducing Network Analysis in R.” A User’s Guide to Network Analysis in R, Springer, 2015, pp. 1-8.
  23. Morales-Fajardo, María Esther. “Strategic Regionalism of the Pacific Alliance: An Outlook throughout the Investment.” Journal of Globalization Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, 2024, pp. 18-35.
  24. Musabay Baki, Pelin. “Turkic World Vision–2040: A Step Forward for the Resilience of Turkic Cooperation.” Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, vol. 27, no. 1, 2022, pp. 26–52.
  25. Mustofaev, Murodjon. “The Organization of Turkic States: A New Approach to Global and Regional Challenges.” Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, vol. 27, no. 1, 2022, pp. 105-120.
  26. Mukazhan, Merey. Personal Interview with Deputy Secretary General of the Organization of Turkic States. 20 Dec 2025.
  27. Oğuzlu, Tarık. “Turkey as a Restrained Middle Power.” Turkish Studies, vol. 24, nos. 3-4, 2023, pp. 673-690.
  28. Öniş, Ziya, and Şuhnaz Yılmaz. “Between Europeanization and Euro-Asianism: Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey during the AKP Era.” Turkish Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, 2009, pp. 7-24.
  29. Özkan, Mehmet, and Birol Akgün. “Turkey’s Opening to Africa.” The Journal of Modern African Studies, vol. 48, no. 4, 2010, pp. 525-46.
  30. Purtaş, Fırat. “Türkiye and the Organization of Turkic States: A Strategic Partnership for Regional Integration.” Insight Turkey, vol. 27, no. 1, 2025, pp. 113-32.
  31. Purtaş, Fırat. Personal interview with Former Deputy Secretary General of TURKSOY. 30 Dec. 2025.
  32. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “International Organisations.” Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs, https://www.mfa.gov.tr/sub.en.mfa?7cafe2ef-78bd-4d88-b326.391.6451364f3.
  33. Sarı, Buğra. “Security Aspect of the Integration in Turkic World under the Organization of Turkic States.” Insight Turkey, vol. 25, no. 4, 2023, pp. 139-161.
  34. Scott, James Wesley. “Transboundary Co-operation on Germany’s Borders: Strategic Regionalism through Multilevel Governance.” Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, 2000, pp. 143-167.
  35. Türbedar, Erhan. “Turkey’s New Activism in the Western Balkans: Ambitions and Obstacles.” Insight Turkey, vol. 13, no. 3, 2011, pp. 139-158.
  36. Tüysüzoğlu, Göktürk. “The Eurasianist Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy after the Coup Attempt: An Evaluation in the Context of the SCO.” Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, 2023, pp. 83-105.
  37. Uzer, Umut. “The Revival of Ottomanism in Turkish Foreign Policy: ‘The World Is Greater Than Five.’” Turkish Policy Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 4, 2018, pp. 29-36.
  38. Väyrynen, Raimo. “Regionalism: Old and New.” International Studies Review, vol. 5, no. 1, 2003, pp. 25-51.
  39. Wicaksana, I Gede Wahyu, and Moch Faisal Karim. “How Regional Organisation Survives: ASEAN, Hedging and International Society.” Contemporary Politics, vol. 29, no. 5, 2023, pp. 659-679.
  40. Yearbook of International Organizations. Union of International Associations, https://uia.org/ybio/.
  41. Yesevi, Çağla Gül. “Examining the Organization of Turkic States: A Teacher and Norm-Creator.” Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, vol. 27, no. 1, 2022, pp. 2-25.
  42. Yeşiltaş, Murat. “Deciphering Turkey’s Assertive Military and Defense Strategy: Objectives, Pillars, and Implications.” Insight Turkey, vol. 22, no. 3, 2020, pp. 89-114.