SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atlas Journal of Medicine / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

Midterm weight loss and nutritional outcomes after one-anastomosis gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center comparative study

Tek anastomozlu gastrik bypass ile laparoskopik tüp mide ameliyatı sonrası orta vadeli kilo kaybı ve beslenme sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması: tek merkezli karşılaştırmalı çalışma

Oktay Karaköse(Isparta Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-2429-3915
Serdar Şenol(Samsun Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Gastroenterolojik Cerrahi Kliniği)0000-0002-6084-2491
Mustafa Kuşak(Samsun Şehir Hastanesi Genel Cerrahi Kliniği)0000-0002-5426-2351
Pages
159–163
Publication Date
2026-10-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study compared the midterm weight-loss outcomes and postoperative nutritional status following OAGB and LSG in a single-center cohort.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are widely performed bariatric procedures with well-established efficacy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, their relative midterm effectiveness and nutritional consequences remain a matter of ongoing debate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study compared the midterm weight-loss outcomes and postoperative nutritional status following OAGB and LSG in a single-center cohort.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gastric Bypass · Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy · Obesity

Abstract

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are widely performed bariatric procedures with well-established efficacy. However, their relative midterm effectiveness and nutritional consequences remain a matter of ongoing debate. This study compared the midterm weight-loss outcomes and postoperative nutritional status following OAGB and LSG in a single-center cohort.

Özet

Laparoskopik tüp mide ameliyatı (LSG) ve tek anastomozlu gastrik bypass (OAGB), etkinliği kanıtlanmış, yaygın olarak uygulanan bariatrik prosedürlerdir. Bununla birlikte, orta vadeli etkinlikleri ve beslenme üzerindeki sonuçları halen tartışma konusudur. Bu çalışma, tek merkezli bir kohortta OAGB ve LSG sonrası orta vadeli kilo kaybı sonuçlarını ve ameliyat sonrası beslenme durumunu karşılaştırmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karaköse, O., Şenol, S., Kuşak, M. (2026). Midterm weight loss and nutritional outcomes after one-anastomosis gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center comparative study. Atlas Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 159–163. https://doi.org/10.54270/atljm.2026.138

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Chalmers KA, Cousins SE, Blazeby JM. ByBandSleeve Trial Management Group. Randomized controlled trials comparing gastric bypass, gastric band, and sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review examining validity and applicability to wider clinical practice. Obes Rev 2024;25(5):e13718.
  2. Wu C, Bai R, Yan W, et al. Clinical Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity. Obes Surg 2020;30:1021–1031.
  3. Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Svokos AA, et al. One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2017;27:2479–2487.
  4. Plamper A, Lingohr P, Nadal J, et al. A Long-Term Comparative Study Between One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2023;27(1):47–55.
  5. Das K, Nadeem F, Kabir SA, et al. Comparison of One-Year Outcomes in Sleeve Gastrectomy vs One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in a Single Bariatric Unit. Cureus 2024;16(11):e74838.
  6. Jain M, Tanita O, Goyal G, et al. LSG vs OAGB: 7-year follow-up data of a randomised control trial and comparative outcome based on BAROS score. Obes Surg 2024;34(4):1295–305.
  7. Kermansaravi M, Karami R, Valizadeh R, et al. Five-year outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass as conversional surgery following sleeve gastrectomy for weight loss failure. Sci Rep 2022;12:10304.
  8. Iannelli A, Treacy P, Sebastianelli L, et al. Perioperative complications of sleeve gastrectomy: Review of the literatüre. J Minim Access Surg 2019:15(1);1-7.
  9. Berger E, Drober L, Assalia A, et al. The Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a Revision for Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2025;35(7):2647-2654.
  10. Musella M, Chiappetta S, Franzese A, et al. OAGB 2025. A systematic review with meta-analysis of indications and results for primary procedures at 5+ years. Updates Surg 2025 Nov;77(7):2059-2076. Epub 2025 Oct 2.
  11. Balamurugan G, Sinclair P, Sesby-Banjoh O, et al. Optimal Bilio-Pancreatic Limb (BPL) Length in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Surgery. Curr Obes Rep 2025 Jan 25;14(1):14.
  12. Wang FG, Yu ZP, Yan WM, et al. Comparison of safety and effectiveness between laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine 2017 Dec;96(50):e8924.
  13. Castro MJ, Jimenez JM, Carbajo MA, et al. Long-Term Weight Loss Results, Remission of Comorbidities and Nutritional Deficiencies of Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) on Type 2 Diabetic (T2D) Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 Oct 20;17(20):7644.
  14. Yu H, Qian L, Yan Y, et al. Analysis of the efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy, one-anastomosis gastric bypass, and single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass in the treatment of metabolic syndrome. Sci Rep 2024;14(1):5069.