Journals / Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Design and Development Ontology for Modeling Karate Techniques Using Semantic Web Standards

Anlamsal Web Standartlarını Kullanarak Karate Tekniklerini Modellemek İçin Tasarım ve Geliştirme Ontolojisi

Tümerkan Karabel(BANDIRMA ONYEDI EYLUL UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE)0009-0009-1743-8985
Alpay Doruk(BANDIRMA ONYEDİ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK VE DOĞA BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ, BİLGİSAYAR MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-6190-288X
Pages
153–162
Publication Date
2026-10-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the ontology that was developed improves hierarchical reasoning and semantic querying.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Karate is a traditional Japanese martial art that has a structured knowledge base that includes stances, methods, directions, target locations, and strategies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper describes how to construct a Karate domain ontology using Semantic Web standards to explain important Karate concepts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the ontology that was developed improves hierarchical reasoning and semantic querying.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ontoloji · Karate · Anlamsal Web

Abstract

Karate is a traditional Japanese martial art that has a structured knowledge base that includes stances, methods, directions, target locations, and strategies. For motion analysis, intelligent training systems, semantic querying, and digital archiving, transforming information into a machine-readable and comprehensible format is essential. This paper describes how to construct a Karate domain ontology using Semantic Web standards to explain important Karate concepts. Web Ontology Language (OWL) over the Protege tool is used to develop the ontology. The ontology and developed frontend form a structured framework that includes processes, anatomical regions, positions, instructions, tactics, and target areas, and object properties, showing how they are related to each other semantically. The proposed ontology provides a formal and flexible basis for future computational research and applications utilizing information in the Karate domain. The results show that the ontology that was developed improves hierarchical reasoning and semantic querying. This facilitates the acquisition of information regarding karate in a more structured manner.

Özet

Karate, duruşlar, yöntemler, yönler, hedef bölgeleri ve stratejikleri içeren yapılandırılmış bir bilgi tabanına sahip geleneksel bir Japon dövüş sanatıdır. Hareket analizi, akıllı antrenman sistemleri, anlamsal sorgulama ve dijital arşivleme için bilgileri makine tarafından okunabilir ve anlaşılabilir bir biçime dönüştürmek gereklidir. Bu makale, önemli karate kavramlarını açıklamak üzere Semantik Web standartlarını kullanarak bir Karate alan ontolojisinin nasıl oluşturulacağını anlatmaktadır. Ontolojiyi oluşturmak için Web Ontology Language (OWL) dili Protege aracı üzerinde kullanılmıştır. Ontoloji ve geliştirilen ön yüz, süreçleri, anatomik bölgeleri, pozisyonları, talimatları, taktikleri, hedef alanları ve nesne özelliklerini içeren ve bunların birbirleriyle anlamsal olarak nasıl ilişkili olduğunu gösteren yapılandırılmış bir çerçeve oluşturmaktadır. Önerilen ontoloji, karate alanındaki bilgileri kullanan gelecekteki hesaplamalı araştırma ve uygulamalar için resmi ve esnek bir temel sağlar. Sonuçlar, oluşturulan ontolojinin semantik sorgulama ve hiyerarşik akıl yürütmeyi geliştirdiğini göstermektedir. Bu, karate ile ilgili bilgileri daha organize bir şekilde bulmayı kolaylaştırmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karabel, T., Doruk, A. (2026). Design and Development Ontology for Modeling Karate Techniques Using Semantic Web Standards. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.46387/bjesr.1931732

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. N. F. Noy and D. L. McGuinness, Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, USA, 2001.
  2. T. R. Gruber, “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199–220, 1993.
  3. N. Guarino, “Formal ontology and information systems,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS), Trento, Italy, 1998, pp. 3–15.
  4. I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and F. van Harmelen, “From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language,” Journal of Web Semantics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–26, 2003.
  5. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Document Overview, W3C Recommendation, 2012.
  6. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), SPARQL 1.1 Query Language, W3C Recommendation, 2013.
  7. J. Euzenat and P. Shvaiko, Ontology Matching, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013.
  8. M. Horridge, H. Knublauch, A. Rector, R. Stevens, and C. Wroe, A Practical Guide to Building OWL Ontologies Using Protege, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 2011.
  9. A. Gangemi, “Ontology design patterns for semantic web content,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Galway, Ireland, 2005, pp. 262–276.
  10. Y. Hou and S. Kenderdine, “Ontology-based knowledge representation for traditional martial arts,” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, vol. 39, 2024.
  11. Britannica Editors (2026, March 12). karate. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/sports/karate.
  12. H. Kanazawa, Karate: The Complete Kata, Kodansha International, Tokyo, Japan, 2012.
  13. M. Nakayama, Dynamic Karate, Kodansha International, Tokyo, Japan, 1986.
  14. H. Wang, W. Wang and L. Wang, "Hierarchical motion evolution for action recognition," 2015 3rd IAPR Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition (ACPR), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2015, pp. 574-578.
  15. R. Poppe, “A survey on vision-based human action recognition,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 976–990, 2010.
  16. L. Chen, J. Hoey, C. D. Nugent, D. J. Cook, and Z. Yu, “Sensor-based activity recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 790–808, 2012.
  17. A. Delaitre, I. Laptev, and J. Sivic, “Recognizing human actions in still images,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 1–8, 2010.
  18. A. Gómez-Pérez, M. Fernández-López, and O. Corcho, Ontological Engineering, Springer, London, UK, 2004.
  19. M. Uschold and M. Gruninger, “Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications,” Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 93–136, 1996.
  20. P. Cimiano, Ontology Learning and Population from Text, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006.