Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 6

Prognostic value of the HATCH score for long-term mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Onur Altınkaya(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, ERZURUM REGION HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0002-2178-6140
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The HATCH score, originally developed to predict atrial fibrillation progression, reflects overall comorbidity burden.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Mid-term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a significant clinical challenge, and simple tools for mid-term risk stratification are limited.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We investigated its association with mid-term all-cause mortality after CABG and compared its prognostic performance with European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The HATCH score, originally developed to predict atrial fibrillation progression, reflects overall comorbidity burden.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Coronary artery bypass grafting · HATCH score · mid-term mortality

Abstract

Aims: Mid-term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a significant clinical challenge, and simple tools for mid-term risk stratification are limited. The HATCH score, originally developed to predict atrial fibrillation progression, reflects overall comorbidity burden. We investigated its association with mid-term all-cause mortality after CABG and compared its prognostic performance with European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II). Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 472 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during follow-up. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed, and three separate models were constructed incorporating clinical variables, the HATCH score, or EuroSCORE II. Discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and Harrell’s Concordance Index (C-Index). Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis according to HATCH categories (<2 vs. ≥2). Results: During a mean follow-up of 603±258 days, 55 patients (11.7%) died. The HATCH score was independently associated with mortality (HR 1.740, 95% CI 1.410-2.148; p<0.001). Its discriminative ability was numerically higher than that of EuroSCORE II (AUC 0.705 vs. 0.676), although the difference was not statistically significant (DeLong test, p=0.483), while the HATCH-based model showed the highest C-Index (0.795). Patients with a HATCH score ≥2 had significantly lower survival (log-rank p<0.001). Conclusion: The HATCH score independently predicted mortality after CABG, with discrimination comparable to EuroSCORE II. Given its simplicity, it may serve as a practical adjunct to existing risk-stratification tools for identifying patients at increased mid-term risk.

🔖

Cite This Article

Altınkaya, O. (2026). Prognostic value of the HATCH score for long-term mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 6. https://ajindex.com/articles/1668027

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(3):e18-e114. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038
  2. Nashef SA, Roques F, Sharples LD, et al. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41(4):734-744; discussion 744-745. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezs043
  3. Shahian DM, Jacobs JP, Badhwar V, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2018 adult cardiac surgery risk models: part 1-background, design considerations, and model development. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105(5):1411-1418. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.03.002
  4. de Vos CB, Pisters R, Nieuwlaat R, et al. Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation clinical correlates and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(8):725-731. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.040
  5. Emren V, Aldemir M, Duygu H, et al. Usefulness of HATCH score as a predictor of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft. Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(8):749-753. doi:10.5603/KP.a2016.0045
  6. Selvi M, Gungor H, Zencir C, et al. A new predictor of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: HATCH score. J Investig Med. 2018;66(3):648-652. doi:10.1136/jim-2017-000525
  7. Engin M, Aydin C. Investigation of the effect of HATCH score and coronary artery disease complexity on atrial fibrillation after on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Med Princ Pract. 2021;30(1):45-51. doi:10.1159/000508726
  8. Jose R, Shetty A, Krishna N, et al. Early and mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(10):e010225. doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.010225
  9. Nammalwar S, Elsherbini A, Sallam A, et al. Mid-term outcomes after robotic coronary artery bypass grafting in the united states. Can J Cardiol. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2026.06.018
  10. Mancia G, Kreutz R, Brunstrom M, et al. 2023 ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA). J Hypertens. 2023;41(12):1874-2071. doi:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003480
  11. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice C. 2. diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(Suppl 1):S20-S42. doi:10.2337/dc24-S002
  12. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes CKDWG. KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2024;105(4S):S117-S314. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018
  13. Ad N, Holmes SD, Patel J, Pritchard G, Shuman DJ, Halpin L. Comparison of EuroSCORE II, original EuroSCORE, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score in cardiac surgery patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(2):573-579. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.105
  14. Adelborg K, Horvath-Puho E, Schmidt M, et al. Thirty-year mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a Danish nationwide population-based cohort study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(5):e002708. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002708
  15. Barili F, Pacini D, D’Ovidio M, et al. The Impact of EuroSCORE II risk factors on prediction of long-term mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102(4):1296-1303. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.017
  16. Wu C, Camacho FT, Wechsler AS, et al. Risk score for predicting long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2012;125(20):2423-2430. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.055939
  17. Zhao D, Chen S, Liu Y, et al. Blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio in predicting long-term mortality in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of the MIMIC-III database. Front Surg. 2022;9:801708. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.801708
  18. Lotter K, Yadav S, Saxena P, Vangaveti V, John B. Predictors of atrial fibrillation post coronary artery bypass graft surgery: new scoring system. Open Heart. 2023;10:1. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2023-002284
  19. Shibata N, Kondo T, Morimoto R, et al. Clinical value of the HATCH score for predicting adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure. Heart Vessels. 2022;37(8):1363-1372. doi:10.1007/s00380-022-02035-w
  20. Hu WS, Lin CL. Comparisons of HATCH, HAVOC and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for all-cause mortality prediction in atrial fibrillation: a real-world evidence study. Postgrad Med J. 2023;99(1170):326-332. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-141147
  21. Haghjoo M, Heidarali M, Nikfarjam S, et al. Very late effects of postoperative atrial fibrillation on outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Res Cardiovasc Med. 2012;1(1):23-27. doi:10.5812/cardiovascmed.4584
  22. Endo D, Yamamoto T, Kajimoto K, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic kidney disease: chronic kidney disease has an independent adverse effect on the long-term outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:4994970. doi:10.1155/2022/4994970
  23. Gibson PH, Croal BL, Cuthbertson BH, et al. Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and outcome from coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J. 2007;154(5):995-1002. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.043
  24. Urbanowicz T, Olasinska-Wisniewska A, Michalak M, et al. The prognostic significance of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on long-term survival in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) procedures. Biology (Basel). 2021;11:1. doi:10.3390/biology11010034
  25. Oh AR, Kwon JH, Park J, et al. Preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and mortality of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;11:1354816. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1354816