Journals / InTraders Uluslararası Ticaret Akademik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: Special Issue Special Issue

Digital Trade Restrictions and High-Technology Export Performance: Panel Fixed Effects Evidence from Emerging Economies

Damla Özekan(YEDİTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9952-129X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results are interpreted as conditional associations rather than causal effects and highlight the potential relevance of open and interoperable digital regulatory environments for technology-intensive export performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As the digital economy transforms global trade, cross-border data flows and digital service inputs have become critical for technology-intensive manufacturing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study examines the relationship between digital trade restrictiveness and high-technology export performance across 20 emerging economies from 2014 to 2024.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results are interpreted as conditional associations rather than causal effects and highlight the potential relevance of open and interoperable digital regulatory environments for technology-intensive export performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Digital Trade Restrictions · digital STRI · high-technology exports

Abstract

As the digital economy transforms global trade, cross-border data flows and digital service inputs have become critical for technology-intensive manufacturing. This study examines the relationship between digital trade restrictiveness and high-technology export performance across 20 emerging economies from 2014 to 2024. Employing a country fixed-effects estimator and a set of robustness specifications addressing alternative error structures and common temporal shocks, the analysis investigates whether the OECD Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (Digital STRI) is systematically associated with the share of high-technology exports in manufactured exports. The baseline country fixed-effects estimate is negative and statistically significant, indicating that higher levels of Digital STRI are associated with lower high-technology export shares. Across alternative covariance estimators and Two-Way Fixed Effects specifications, the estimated coefficient remains negative and similar in magnitude, although its statistical precision varies across inference procedures. Economic maturity, proxied by GDP per capita, is positively and significantly associated with the high-technology export share in the baseline specification, whereas foreign direct investment (FDI), manufacturing value added (MVA), and trade openness are statistically insignificant in that specification. The results are interpreted as conditional associations rather than causal effects and highlight the potential relevance of open and interoperable digital regulatory environments for technology-intensive export performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özekan, D. (2026). Digital Trade Restrictions and High-Technology Export Performance: Panel Fixed Effects Evidence from Emerging Economies. InTraders Uluslararası Ticaret Akademik Dergisi, Volume: 9 Issue: Special Issue Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.55065/intraders.2001438

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Akça, E. (2024). The impact of digital services trade restrictiveness on trade in telecommunications, computer and information services: Evidence from OECD countries. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 22(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1367503
  2. Ferencz, J. (2019). The OECD digital services trade restrictiveness index (OECD Trade Policy Papers No. 221). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/16ed2d78-en
  3. Ferencz, J., & Gonzales, F. (2019). Barriers to trade in digitally enabled services in the G20. OECD Trade Policy Papers, No:232, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/264c4c02-en
  4. Gao, Z., Kang, C., & Zhang, X. (2024). The role and impact of cross-border data flows in international business digital trade. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1-14.
  5. Gupta, S., Ghosh, P., & Sridhar, V. (2022). Impact of data trade restrictions on IT services export: A cross-country analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 46(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102403
  6. Hu, G., Zhang, X., Yang, J., Sun, W., & Zhu, T. (2025). Uncovering the mechanism of elevating high-tech export competitiveness in China’s sustainable economic development: Force of digital economy. Sustainability, 17(8), 3667. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083667
  7. International Monetary Fund. (2026). World Economic Outlook, April 2026: Global Economy in the Shadow of War. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/weo/2026/april/english/text.pdf
  8. Jiang, L., Liu, S., & Zhang, G. (2022). Digital trade barriers and export performance: Evidence from China. Southern Economic Journal, 88(4), 1401-1430. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12572
  9. Kong, N., Wang, B., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, N. (2024). How does digital technology affect export in services? Journal of Asian Economics, 95, 101814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101814
  10. Kong, M., & Zong, Y. (2025). A research on the impact of digital service trade barriers on IFDI. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 55. https://doi.org/10.54097/9mymvq70
  11. Kumar, D., Sharma, R. R. K., Ram, M., Singh, K., & Verma, P. K. (2025). Digitalization and its impact on export trade. International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, 2025(1), 946-954. https://doi.org/10.52783/ijept.124
  12. Li, Y., & Zhu, S. (2023). Impact of digital services trade restrictiveness on manufacturing export efficiency. Applied Economics, 56(58), 8447-8461. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2290596
  13. Liang, S., & Tan, Q. (2024). Can the digital economy accelerates China’s export technology upgrading? Based on the perspective of export technology complexity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123052
  14. Ma, X., Huo, Y., & Zhu, T. (2025). Leveraging the digital economy for enhanced digital service trade exports: Lessons from China. PLOS One, 20(10), e0333798. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333798
  15. Mirzaye, S., & Mohiuddin, M. (2025). Digital transformation in international trade: Opportunities, challenges, and policy implications. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(8), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18080421
  16. Mulenga, R., & Mayondi, M. (2022). Impact of digital services trade on economic growth of developing, emerging and developed countries: P-VAR approach. American Journal of Economics, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.47672/aje.1053
  17. Natanael, Y. (2025). Beyond borders and tangibility: Understanding trade restrictions, institutional quality and digital services trade. International Journal of Development Issues, 24(3), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDI-11-2024-0294
  18. Nikensari, S. I., Oktavilla, S., Istikomah, N., & Puspitasari, N. (2024). The role of digital services trade restrictiveness in exports: Before and during COVID–19. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.27.06
  19. OECD. (2026). Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index [Data set]. OECD Data Explorer. Retrieved June 16, 2026, from https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?lc=en&df[ds]=DisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_STRI%40DF_STRI_DIGITAL&df[ag]=OECD.TAD.TPD&df[vs]=1.0&dq=A..&lom=LASTNPERIODS&lo=5&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false
  20. Özsoy, S., Ergüzel, O. Ş., Ersoy, A. Y., & Saygılı, M. (2021). The impact of digitalization on export of high technology products: A panel data approach. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 31(2), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2021.1965645
  21. Tong, L. (2025). The impact of the EU GDPR implementation on China’s digital service trade exports. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 201(1), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.LD25045
  22. Vo, D., Warkentin, M., & Tran, N. P. (2024). Examining the effects of national intellectual capital on economic growth: Does digital services trade restrictiveness matter? Journal of Knowledge Management, 29(1), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2023-1288
  23. Wang, C., Meng, F., & Liu, T. (2025). The impact of digital trade development on China’s export of technology-intensive products: Evidence from importing countries. PLOS One, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321285
  24. Wang, X., Wang, Z., & Li, G. (2025). Barriers to digital services trade: Evaluation of their restrictiveness with application of Brier score. Oeconomia Copernicana, 16(1), 197-245. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.3435
  25. Wang, X., Zhang, J., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Barriers to digital services trade and export efficiency of digital services. Sustainability, 16(17), 7517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177517
  26. Wang, Y., & Lu, R. (2026). The impact of digital services trade restrictions on export competitiveness. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 7(2), 147-152. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2026.7.2.147-152
  27. World Bank. (2026). World Development Indicators [Data set]. World Bank DataBank. Retrieved June 16, 2026, from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
  28. Yang, F., Wang, Y., & Whang, U. (2023). Trade restrictions on digital services and the impact on manufacturing exports. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 33(4), 523-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2195958
  29. Zhang, L., Pham, T. D., Li, R., & Do, T. T. (2025). Enhancing the sustainable development of the ASEAN’s digital trade: The impact mechanism of innovation capability. Sustainability, 17(4), 1766. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041766
  30. Zhang, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). Research on the influence of digital technology and policy restrictions on the development of digital service trade. Sustainability, 14(16), 10420. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610420
  31. OECD. (2026). Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index [Data set]. OECD Data Explorer. Retrieved June 16, 2026, from https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?lc=en&df[ds]=DisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_STRI%40DF_STRI_DIGITAL&df[ag]=OECD.TAD.TPD&df[vs]=1.0&dq=A.&lom=LASTNPERIODS&lo=5&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false