Journals / InTraders Uluslararası Ticaret Akademik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: Special Issue Special Issue

Selecting Next-Generation AI Technologies for Sustainable Pharmaceutical Supply Chains: An Integrated LOPCOW–RAFSI Approach

Barış Kantoğlu(DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7832-1619
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that AI-powered Digital Twin (A3) achieved the highest RAFSI score (0.666060), followed by Agentic AI (A2) (0.547032) and Explainable AI (A5) (0.541363), resulting in the overall ranking A3 > A2 > A5 > A6 > A4 > A1.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to evaluate and prioritize next-generation artificial intelligence (AI) technologies for sustainable pharmaceutical supply chains by considering multiple technological, operational, sustainability, and regulatory criteria.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the methodology of the study, an integrated LOPCOW–RAFSI multi-criteria decision-making framework was employed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that AI-powered Digital Twin (A3) achieved the highest RAFSI score (0.666060), followed by Agentic AI (A2) (0.547032) and Explainable AI (A5) (0.541363), resulting in the overall ranking A3 > A2 > A5 > A6 > A4 > A1.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sustainable pharmaceutical supply chain · artificial intelligence · multi-criteria decision-making

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and prioritize next-generation artificial intelligence (AI) technologies for sustainable pharmaceutical supply chains by considering multiple technological, operational, sustainability, and regulatory criteria. Within the methodology of the study, an integrated LOPCOW–RAFSI multi-criteria decision-making framework was employed. Fifteen evaluation criteria were identified through a comprehensive literature review and reviewed for domain relevance and applicability, and six AI technology alternatives—Generative AI, Agentic AI, AI-powered Digital Twin, Federated Learning, Explainable AI, and Reinforcement Learning—were evaluated. The LOPCOW method was used to determine objective criterion weights, while the RAFSI method was applied to rank the alternatives. The findings indicate that AI-powered Digital Twin (A3) achieved the highest RAFSI score (0.666060), followed by Agentic AI (A2) (0.547032) and Explainable AI (A5) (0.541363), resulting in the overall ranking A3 > A2 > A5 > A6 > A4 > A1. The sensitivity analysis further showed that A3 retained the first position across all examined scenarios (S0–S6), although limited rank reversals occurred between A2 and A5. As a contribution to the literature, this study integrates objective weighting and robust ranking within a unified decision-support framework for evaluating emerging AI technologies and provides decision-makers with a systematic and transparent basis for prioritizing AI investments in sustainable pharmaceutical supply chains.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kantoğlu, B. (2026). Selecting Next-Generation AI Technologies for Sustainable Pharmaceutical Supply Chains: An Integrated LOPCOW–RAFSI Approach. InTraders Uluslararası Ticaret Akademik Dergisi, Volume: 9 Issue: Special Issue Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.55065/intraders.1998994

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018
  2. Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
  3. Belal, M. M., Shukla, V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2025). Greening the pharmaceutical supply chain. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(2), 1917–1948. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4077
  4. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
  5. Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., Kaisar, S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148, 102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271
  6. Ding, B. (2018). Pharma Industry 4.0: Literature review and research opportunities in sustainable pharmaceutical supply chains. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 119, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.031
  7. Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.08608
  8. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B.,. Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, Article 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
  9. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D.,. Wright, R. (2023). Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  10. Ecer, F., & Pamučar, D. (2022). A novel LOPCOW-DOBI multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment methodology: An application in developing country banking sector. Omega, 112, 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102690
  11. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers.
  12. European Commission, High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2759/346720
  13. Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7
  14. Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2018). A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(5), Article 93. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236009
  15. Gunning, D., Stefik, M., Choi, J., Miller, T., Stumpf, S., & Yang, G.-Z. (2019). XAI—Explainable artificial intelligence. Science Robotics, 4(37), eaay7120. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aay7120
  16. Ivanov, D. (2021). Supply chain viability and the COVID-19 pandemic: A conceptual and formal generalisation of four major adaptation strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 59(12), 3535–3552. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1890852
  17. Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control, 32(9), 775–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1768450
  18. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications for Industry 4.0: A literature-based study. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 7(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862221300040
  19. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., D’Oliveira, R. G. L., Eichner, H., El Rouayheb, S., Evans, D., Gardner, J., Garrett, Z., Gascón, A., Ghazi, B., Gibbons, P. B., … Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000083
  20. Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Parekh, H., Mani, V., Belhadi, A., & Sharma, R. (2022). Digital twin for sustainable manufacturing supply chains: Current trends, future perspectives, and an implementation framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121448
  21. Korucuk, S., Aytekin, A., Görçün, Ö., Simić, V., & Görçün, Ö. F. (2024). Warehouse site selection for humanitarian relief organizations using an interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy LOPCOW–RAFSI model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 192, 110160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110160
  22. Laganà, I. R., & Colapinto, C. (2022). Multiple criteria decision-making in healthcare and pharmaceutical supply chain management: A state-of-the-art review and implications for future research. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 29(1–2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1778
  23. Narayana, S. A., Pati, R. K., & Vrat, P. (2014). Managerial research on the pharmaceutical supply chain—A critical review and some insights for future directions. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 20(1), 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2013.09.001
  24. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletari, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., Ourselin, S., Sheller, M., Summers, R. M., Trask, A., Xu, D., Baust, M., & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3, Article 119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1
  25. Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
  26. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
  27. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
  28. Wamba, S. F., Queiroz, M. M., Guthrie, C., & Braganza, A. (2022). Industry experiences of artificial intelligence (AI): Benefits and challenges in operations and supply chain management. Production Planning & Control, 33(16), 1493–1497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1882695
  29. Yu, C., Liu, J., Nemati, S., & Yin, G. (2023). Reinforcement learning in healthcare: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(1), Article 5, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3477600
  30. Žižović, M., Pamučar, D., Albijanić, M., Chatterjee, P., & Pribićević, I. (2020). Eliminating rank reversal problem using a new multi-attribute model—The RAFSI method. Mathematics, 8(6), 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8061015
  31. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B.,. Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, Article 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
  32. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D.,. Wright, R. (2023). Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642