SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Politics and Security / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Domestic Institutional Trust and EU Membership Support in Candidate Countries: Evidence from Albania and Serbia

Noela Mahmutaj(University of Tirana)0000-0003-1969-6944
Pages
350–361
Publication Date
2026-10-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings suggest that the observed coexistence of low domestic institutional trust and strong support for EU membership is consistent with the proposed substitution logic of political trust.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article challenges the conventional assumption that domestic political trust and support for European integration reinforce one another.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study employs a comparative case study design, drawing on nationally representative Balkan Barometer surveys (2017–2023), complemented by Eurobarometer data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings suggest that the observed coexistence of low domestic institutional trust and strong support for EU membership is consistent with the proposed substitution logic of political trust.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017–2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Political trust · Institutional trust · European integration

Abstract

This article challenges the conventional assumption that domestic political trust and support for European integration reinforce one another. It examines whether low trust in domestic political institutions coexists with strong support for the EU in aspirant countries. The study employs a comparative case study design, drawing on nationally representative Balkan Barometer surveys (2017–2023), complemented by Eurobarometer data. This design is to compare patterns of institutional trust and support for EU membership in Albania and Serbia. The article proposes the substitution logic of the political trust analytical framework, demonstrating its relevance through a comparative analysis of Albania and Serbia. The findings suggest that the observed coexistence of low domestic institutional trust and strong support for EU membership is consistent with the proposed substitution logic of political trust.

Özet

This article challenges the conventional assumption that domestic political trust and support for European integration reinforce one another. It examines whether low trust in domestic political institutions coexists with strong support for the EU in aspirant countries. The study employs a comparative case study design, drawing on nationally representative Balkan Barometer surveys (2017–2023), complemented by Eurobarometer data. This design is to compare patterns of institutional trust and support for EU membership in Albania and Serbia. The article proposes the substitution logic of the political trust analytical framework, demonstrating its relevance through a comparative analysis of Albania and Serbia. The findings suggest that the observed coexistence of low domestic institutional trust and strong support for EU membership is consistent with the proposed substitution logic of political trust.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mahmutaj, N. (2026). Domestic Institutional Trust and EU Membership Support in Candidate Countries: Evidence from Albania and Serbia. International Journal of Politics and Security, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 350–361. https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.1992475

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Anderson, C. J. (1998). When in Doubt, Use Proxies. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414098031005002
  2. Belgrade Centre for Security Policy. (2022). Public perception of Serbian foreign policy in the midst of the war in Ukraine. https://bezbednost.org/en/publikacija/public-perception-of-serbian-foreign-policy-in-the-midst-of-the-war-in-ukraine/
  3. Bieber, F., & Tzifakis, N. (Eds.). (2020). The Western Balkans in the world: Linkages and relations with non-Western countries. Routledge.
  4. Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2012). From Europeanisation to diffusion: Introduction. West European Politics, 35(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.631310
  5. De Vries, C. E. (2018). Euroscepticism and the future of European integration. Oxford University Press. Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457. http://www.jstor.org/stable/193437
  6. Elbasani, A. (Ed.). (2013). European integration and transformation in the Western Balkans: Europeanization or business as usual? Routledge.
  7. European Commission. (2025a). Albania 2025 report. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52025SC0750
  8. European Commission. (2025b). Serbia 2025 report. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025SC0755
  9. Grabbe, H. (2006). The EU's transformative power: Europeanization through conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
  11. Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475
  12. Mahmutaj, N. (2023). Russian government policy in the Western Balkans. In A. Mihr, P. Sorbello, & B. Weiffen (Eds.), Securitization and democracy in Eurasia. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16659-4_8
  13. Mahmutaj, N. (2025). Competing for influence: EU–China strategic engagement in the Western Balkans. International Journal of Politics and Security, 7(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.1567113
  14. Ministry of European Integration of the Republic of Serbia. (2023). Citizens' support for European reforms remains at a high level. https://www.mei.gov.rs/eng/news/1820/more/w/0/citizensi-039-support-for-european-reforms-remains-at-a-high-level/
  15. Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034001002
  16. Muñoz, J., Torcal, M., & Bonet, E. (2011). Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation? European Union Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511419250
  17. Noutcheva, G. (2009). Fake, partial and imposed compliance: the limits of the EU’s normative power in the Western Balkans. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(7), 1065–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903226872
  18. Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Regional Cooperation Council. (2017). Balkan Barometer 2017: Public opinion survey.https://www.rcc.int/balkanbarometer/publications
  20. Regional Cooperation Council. (2018). Balkan Barometer 2018: Public opinion survey.https://www.rcc.int/balkanbarometer/publications
  21. Regional Cooperation Council. (2019). Balkan Barometer 2019: Public opinion survey.https://www.rcc.int/balkanbarometer/publications
  22. Regional Cooperation Council. (2020). Balkan Barometer 2020: Public opinion survey.https://www.rcc.int/balkanbarometer/publications
  23. Regional Cooperation Council. (2021). Balkan Barometer 2021: Public opinion survey.https://www.rcc.int/balkanbarometer/publications
  24. Regional Cooperation Council. (2022). Balkan Barometer 2022: Public opinion survey.https://www.rcc.int/balkanbarometer/publications
  25. Regional Cooperation Council. (2023). Balkan Barometer 2023: Public opinion survey.https://www.rcc.int/balkanbarometer/publicationsS
  26. Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (2000). The political basis of support for European integration. European Union Politics, 1(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001002001
  27. Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000248089
  28. Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (Eds.). (2005). The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Cornell University Press.
  29. Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
  30. Vachudova, M. A. (2005). Europe undivided: Democracy, leverage, and integration after communism. Oxford University Press.