SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnternet Uygulamaları ve Yönetimi Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 1

Digital Literacy and Digital Detox Intention: The Moderating Roles of FoMO and JoMO

Dijital Okuryazarlık ve Dijital Detoks Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkide FoMO ve JoMO’nun Düzenleyici Rolleri

Sena Aydın(İSTANBUL TİCARET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5241-629X
Pages
105–117
Publication Date
2026-10-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings suggest that positive orientations toward disconnection deserve attention alongside digital competence in research on digital well-being.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study examines whether digital literacy predicts digital detox intention and whether Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and Joy of Missing Out (JoMO) moderate this relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected via Prolific from an approximately gender-balanced sample of 216 UK citizens and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings suggest that positive orientations toward disconnection deserve attention alongside digital competence in research on digital well-being.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dijital Detoks · Dijital Okuryazarlık · Gelişmeleri Kaçırma Korkusu (FoMO)

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines whether digital literacy predicts digital detox intention and whether Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and Joy of Missing Out (JoMO) moderate this relationship. Design/methodology: A cross-sectional survey design was adopted. Data were collected via Prolific from an approximately gender-balanced sample of 216 UK citizens and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Findings: Digital literacy did not have a statistically significant direct effect on digital detox intention, and neither FoMO nor JoMO significantly moderated this relationship. However, JoMO emerged as a significant positive predictor of digital detox intention, suggesting that individuals who find satisfaction in disconnecting are more likely to intend to engage in digital detox. Given the cross-sectional design and the modest, explained variance, these results describe associations rather than causal effects. Originality/value: The study examines FoMO and JoMO within the same model and approaches digital detox through proactive competence rather than negative experiences alone. The findings suggest that positive orientations toward disconnection deserve attention alongside digital competence in research on digital well-being.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, dijital okuryazarlığın dijital detoks niyetiyle ilişkili olup olmadığını ve Gelişmeleri Kaçırma Korkusu (FoMO) ile Gelişmeleri Kaçırma Keyfinin (JoMO) bu ilişkide düzenleyici rol oynayıp oynamadığını incelemektedir. Yöntem: Kesitsel bir anket deseni benimsenmiştir. Veriler, Prolific üzerinden cinsiyet açısından yaklaşık dengeli 216 Birleşik Krallık vatandaşından toplanmış ve kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (PLS-SEM) ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Dijital okuryazarlığın dijital detoks niyeti üzerinde anlamlı doğrudan bir etkisi bulunmamış, FoMO ve JoMO’nun düzenleyici etkileri de anlamlı çıkmamıştır. Buna karşılık JoMO, dijital detoks niyetini anlamlı ve pozitif yönde açıklayan tek değişken olmuştur; bağlantıyı kesmekten keyif alan bireyler daha güçlü detoks niyeti bildirmiştir. Kesitsel desen ve sınırlı açıklanan varyans nedeniyle bulgular nedensellik değil, ilişki düzeyinde yorumlanmalıdır. Özgünlük: Çalışma, FoMO ve JoMO’yu aynı model içinde ele almakta ve dijital detoksu yalnızca olumsuz deneyimler üzerinden değil, proaktif yetkinlikler üzerinden incelemektedir. Bulgular, dijital iyi oluş araştırmalarında bağlantısızlığa yönelik olumlu yönelimlerin dijital yetkinlikle birlikte dikkate alınması gerektiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydın, S. (2026). Digital Literacy and Digital Detox Intention: The Moderating Roles of FoMO and JoMO. İnternet Uygulamaları ve Yönetimi Dergisi, Sayı: 1, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.34231/iuyd.2006458

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  2. Alt, D. (2015). College students' academic motivation, media engagement and fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 111-119.
  3. Barry, C. T., Smith, E. E., Murphy, M. B., Halter, B. M., & Briggs, J. (2023). JOMO: Joy of missing out and its association with social media use, self-perception, and mental health. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 10, 100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2023.100054
  4. Dempsey, A. E., O'Brien, K. D., Tiamiyu, M. F., & Elhai, J. D. (2019). Fear of missing out (FoMO) and rumination mediate relations between social anxiety and problematic Facebook use. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 9, 100150.
  5. Ercan, S., Yaprak, B., Ecevit, M. Z., & Duman, O. (2025). Sustainable but disgusting? A psychological model of consumer reactions to human-hair-derived textiles. Sustainability, 17(17), 7799.
  6. Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
  7. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F.,
  8. Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People: An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.
  9. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  10. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Publishing.
  11. Gui, M., & Büchi, M. (2021). From use to overuse: Digital inequality in the age of communication abundance. Social Science Computer Review, 39(1), 3-19.
  12. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  13. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  14. Jones, L. M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2016). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New Media & Society, 18(9), 2063-2079.
  15. Kantar, A., Yalçın, İ., Onat Kocabıyık, O., & Barry, C. T. (2025). Joy of Missing Out (JOMO) and its role in reducing social media addiction: The serial mediating role of loneliness and psychological distress. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251378710
  16. Kaya, Y., Yildirim Kurtulus, H., Taskin, S., Deniz, M. E., & Satici, S. A. (2025). Adaptation of the Joy of Missing Out (JoMO) Scale: Its association with fear of missing out (FoMO), social media use, mental well-being, mindfulness, and self-compassion. Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2025.2545254
  17. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the Internet: The role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society, 12(2), 309-329.
  18. Montag, C., Lachmann, B., Herrlich, M., & Zweig, K. (2019). Addictive features of social media/messenger platforms and freemium games against the background of psychological and economic theories. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2612.
  19. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59, 1065-1078.
  20. Peña-García, N., Gil-Saura, I., Rodríguez-Orejuela, A., & Siqueira-Junior, J. R. (2020). Purchase intention and purchase behavior online: A cross-cultural approach. Heliyon, 6, e04284.
  21. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841-1848.
  22. Radtke, T., Apel, T., Schenkel, K., Keller, J., & von Lindern, E. (2022). Digital detox: An effective solution in the smartphone era? A systematic literature review. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 190-215.
  23. Ribble, M., & Bailey, G. D. (2011). Digital citizenship in schools. International Society for Technology in Education.
  24. Sihombing, S. O., & Juliana, J. (2026). Digital detox intention among Indonesian Generation Z: The role of eudaimonic values, subjective norms, perceived information overload, and self-efficacy. Societies, 16(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16020054
  25. Syvertsen, T., & Enli, G. (2020). Digital detox: Media resistance and the promise of authenticity. Convergence, 26(5-6), 1269-1283.
  26. Throuvala, M. A., Griffiths, M. D., Rennoldson, M., & Kuss, D. J. (2019). Motivational processes and dysfunctional mechanisms of social media use among adolescents: A qualitative focus group study. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 164-175.
  27. Van Deursen, A. J., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2016). Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Information, Communication & Society, 19(6), 804-823.
  28. Van Dijk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. SAGE.
  29. Wolniewicz, C. A., Tiamiyu, M. F., Weeks, J. W., & Elhai, J. D. (2018). Problematic smartphone use and relations with negative affect, fear of missing out, and fear of negative and positive evaluation. Psychiatry Research, 262, 618-623.
  30. Zhang, Z., Jiménez, F. R., & Cicala, J. E. (2020). Fear of missing out scale: A self-concept perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 37(11), 1619-1634. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21406