SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi / 2025 / Volume: 25 Issue: 2

EFFECT OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD DERIVED FROM ELECTRIC FENCE SYSTEM ON SPERM ACTIVITIES OF HONEYBEES (Apis mellifera L.)

Elektrikli Çit Sistemi Tarafından Oluşturulan Elektromanyetik Alanın Bal Arılarının (Apis mellifera L.) Sperm Aktivitesine Etkisi

Yaşar Erdoğan(BAYBURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BAYBURT MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0001-6154-7008
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-11-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results demonstrate that electric fields from fence systems suppress developmental processes and reproductive physiology of drones in a distance-dependent manner.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated the effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from electric fence systems on physiological and reproductive parameters of male honeybees (Apis mellifera caucasica).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted between May and August 2024 at the Bayburt University Beekeeping Application and Research Center, with five experimental groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results demonstrate that electric fields from fence systems suppress developmental processes and reproductive physiology of drones in a distance-dependent manner.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Honey bee · Electric fence · Electromagnetic field

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from electric fence systems on physiological and reproductive parameters of male honeybees (Apis mellifera caucasica). The study was conducted between May and August 2024 at the Bayburt University Beekeeping Application and Research Center, with five experimental groups. Hives were positioned at varying distances (1–2.5 m) from the fence. The findings showed that the average body weight (245.4 mg), sexual maturity rate (58.56%), and sperm concentration (0.87 ± 0.04 × 10 ⁶/µL) of drones closest to the electric fence were significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The electric field effect was limited in groups at greater distances, with statistically insignificant differences in some parameters. No significant differences were found between groups in sperm volume. Results demonstrate that electric fields from fence systems suppress developmental processes and reproductive physiology of drones in a distance-dependent manner. Lower body weight, decreased sperm concentration, and proportion of mature males in colonies near the fence show electromagnetic stress is a significant risk for bee health. Future studies should examine the effects of electromagnetic fields at different frequencies and strengths on larval development, sperm morphology, oxidative stress markers, and gene expression profiles.

Özet

Bu çalışma, elektrikli çit sistemlerinden kaynaklanan elektromanyetik alanların (EMA) erkek bal arılarının (Apis mellifera caucasica) fizyolojik ve üreme parametreleri üzerindeki etkilerini araştırmak amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Çalışma, Mayıs-Ağustos 2024 tarihleri arasında Bayburt Üniversitesi Arıcılık Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi'nin yazlık arılığında gerçekleştirilmiş ve beş farklı deney grubu oluşturulmuştur. Kovanlar, çitten farklı mesafelere (1-2.5 m) yerleştirilmiştir.Bulgular, elektrikli çite en yakın kolonilerdeki erkek arıların ortalama vücut ağırlığının (245,4 mg), cinsel olgunluk oranının (%58.56) ve sperm konsantrasyonunun (0.87 ± 0.04 × 10⁶/µL) önemli ölçüde azaldığını göstermiştir (p < 0.05). Buna karşılık, elektrik alan etkisi daha uzak mesafelerdeki gruplarda sınırlı kalmış ve bazı parametrelerde istatistiksel olarak anlamsız farklılıklar gözlenmiştir. Sperm hacmi açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunamamıştır. Sonuçlar, elektrikli çit sistemleri tarafından üretilen elektrik alanının, erkek arıların gelişim süreçlerini ve üreme fizyolojisini mesafeye bağlı olarak baskıladığını göstermektedir. Çite yakın kolonilerde gözlenen düşük vücut ağırlığı, azalmış sperm konsantrasyonu ve olgun erkek arı oranı, elektromanyetik stresin arı sağlığı için önemli bir risk faktörü olduğunu göstermektedir. Farklı frekans ve güçlerdeki elektromanyetik alanların larva gelişimi, sperm morfolojisi, oksidatif stres belirteçleri ve gen ifadesi profilleri üzerindeki etkilerinin kapsamlı bir şekilde incelenmesi için gelecekteki çalışmalar önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Erdoğan, Y. (2025). EFFECT OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD DERIVED FROM ELECTRIC FENCE SYSTEM ON SPERM ACTIVITIES OF HONEYBEES (Apis mellifera L.). Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, Volume: 25 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.31467/uluaricilik.1794399

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Abdollahi M, Giovenazzo P, Falk T. Automated Beehive Acoustics Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Work. Applied Sciences 2022; 12: 3920. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083920
  2. Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Sharma R K, Ranga G, Li J. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study. Fertility sterility. 2008; 89(1): 124-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.166
  3. Aydin M, Turk G, Yuksel M, Cevik A, Apaydin A, Yilmaz S. Effect of electromagnetic field on the sperm characteristics and histopathological status of testis in rats. Medycyna Weterynaryjna. 2007; 63(2): 178-183.
  4. Collins AM. Relationship between semen quality and performance of instrumentally inseminated honey bee queens. Apidologie, 2000; 31(3), 421-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:2000132
  5. Collins A, Donoghue AJT. Viability assessment of honey bee, Apis mellifera, sperm using dual fluorescent staining. Theriogenology. 1999; 51(8): 1513-1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00094-1
  6. Cucurachi S,. Tamis WL, Vijver MG, Peijnenburg WJ, Bolte JF, de Snoo GR. A review of the ecological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Environment international. 2013; 51: 116-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.10.009
  7. Erdoğan Y. Determination of the effect of electric fence system on productivity and behaviour of honeybees housed in different beehive types (Apis mellifera L.). Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2019; 18(1), 941-948. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2019.1604089
  8. Forgács Z, Somosy Z, Kubinyi G, Sinay H, Bakos J, Thuróczy G, Surján A, Hudák A, Olajos F, Lázár P. Effects of whole-body 50-Hz magnetic field exposure on mouse Leydig cells. TheScientificWorldJournal. 2004; 4: 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2004.182
  9. Gajšek P, Ravazzani P, Grellier J, Samaras T, Bakos J, Thuróczy G. Review of studies concerning electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure assessment in Europe: Low frequency fields (50 Hz–100 kHz). International journal of environmental research public health. 2016; 13(9): 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13090875
  10. Gençer HV, Kahya Y. Sperm competition in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): the role of body size dimorphism in drones. Apidologie. 2020; (51): 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-019-00699-4
  11. Goulson D, Rotheray E. Population dynamics of the invasive weed Lupinus arboreus in Tasmania, and interactions with two non-native pollinators. Weed Research.2012; 52: 535-541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2012.00935.x
  12. Gutschi T, Mohamad Al‐Ali B, Shamloul R, Pummer K, Trummer H. Impact of cell phone use on men’s semen parameters. Andrologia. 2011; 43(5): 312-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01075.x
  13. Hamednıa S. Bal arısı (Apis mellifera L.) erkek arılarının üreme özelliklerinde yaşa bağlı değişim, Ankara Universitesi (Turkey). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2012. 31161229.
  14. Harbo J. Instrumental insemination of queen bees. The American bee journal. 1985; 125: 197-202, 282-287.
  15. Kaftanoglu O, Peng YS. Preservation of honeybee spermatozoa in liquid nitrogen. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1984; 23(3): 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1984.11100625
  16. Khaki AA, Zarrintan S, Khaki A, Zahedi A. The effects of electromagnetic field on the microstructure of seminal vesicles in rat: a light and transmission electron microscope study. Pakistan journal of biological sciences: PJBS. 2008; 11(5): 692-701. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2008.692.701
  17. Kirchner W. Acoustical communication in honeybees. Apidologie. 1993; 24: 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19930309
  18. Kumar NR, Devi A, Namita NR, Verma T. Cell Phone Radiations: Influence on Haemolymph and Semen of Drone Honey Bee Apis mellifera L. Int. J. Basic Appl. Biol 2016; 3: 36-39.
  19. Kumar N, Sonika S, Pooja B, Sharma V. Changes in protein profile of Apis mellifera L.(Hymenoptera: Apiidae) worker haemolymph after exposure to cell phone radiation. Entomon. 2009; 34(4): 253-257.
  20. Mailankot M, Kunnath AP, Jayalekshmi H, Koduru B, Valsalan R. Radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8 GHz) mobile phones induces oxidative stress and reduces sperm motility in rats. Clinics. 2009; 64: 561-565. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000600011
  21. Metz BN, Tarpy DR.Variation in the reproductive quality of honey bee males affects their age of flight attempt. PeerJ. 2022; 10: e13859. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13859
  22. Migdal P, Bieńkowski P, Cebrat M, Berbeć E, Plotnik M, Murawska A, Sobkiewicz P,. Łaszkiewicz A,. Latarowski K. Exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field induces a response of the honey bee organism on the level of enzyme activity and the expression of stress-related genes. PloS one. 2023; 18(5): e0285522. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285522
  23. Panagopoulos DJ, Johansson O, Carlo GL. Polarization: a key difference between man-made and natural electromagnetic fields, in regard to biological activity. Scientific Reports 2015; 5(1): 14914. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14914
  24. Rinderer TE, Collins AM, Pesante D, Daniel R, Lancaster V, Baxter J. A comparison of Africanized and European drones: weights, mucus gland and seminal vesicle weights, and counts of spermatozoa. Apidologie. 1985; 16(4): 407-412.
  25. Sainudeen SS. Impact of mobile phones on the density of honeybees. Journal of public administration policy research. 2011; 3(4): 131-117.
  26. Sharma VP, Kumar NR. Changes in honeybee behaviour and biology under the influence of cellphone radiations. Current Science. 2010; 98(10): 1376-1378.
  27. Shoukry RS, Khattaby A, El-Sheakh A, Abo-Ghalia A, Elbanna SM. Effect of some materials for controlling varroa mite on the honeybee drones (Apis mellifera L.).Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2013; 91(3): 825-834. DOI: 10.21608/ejar.2013.165098
  28. Taye RR, Deka MK, Borkataki S, Panda S, Gogoi J. Effect of electromagnetic radiation of cell phone tower on development of Asiatic Honey Bee, Apis cerana F.(Hymenoptera: Apidae). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018; 7(08): 4334-4339. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.454
  29. Vilić M, Tlak Gajger I, Tucak P, Štambuk A, Šrut M, Klobučar G, Malarić K, Žura Žaja I, Pavelić A, Manger M. Effects of short-term exposure to mobile phone radiofrequency (900 MHz) on the oxidative response and genotoxicity in honey bee larvae. Journal of apicultural research. 2017; 56(4): 430-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2017.1329798
  30. Yániz JL, Silvestre MA, Santolaria P. (2020). Sperm quality assessment in honey bee drones. Biology. 2020; 9(7): 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9070174
  31. Goulson D, Rotheray E. Population dynamics of the invasive weed Lupinus arboreus in Tasmania, and interactions with two non-native pollinators. Weed Research.2012; 52: 535-541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2012.00935.x