Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

COMPARISON OF SEQUESTRECTOMY AND AGGRESSIVE DISCECTOMIES IN TERMS OF RECURRENCE IN LUMBAR DISC HERNIA SURGERIES

Pages
222–228
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We suggest that for cases of LDH recurrence, AD is more preferred over other surgical methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a disease that seriously affects people’s social and work life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Seventy patients diagnosed with extruded LDH at a single level who underwent sequestrectomy (S) and 70 patients with the same diagnosis who underwent AD at Başkent University Zübeyde Hanım Hospital were enrolled in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We suggest that for cases of LDH recurrence, AD is more preferred over other surgical methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a disease that seriously affects people’s social and work life. LDH recurrence is a condition that occurs after lumbar microdiscectomy and is characterised by findings of failed lumbar surgery syndrome. Recurrent disk herniation may develop due to demographic factors, obesity and limited discectomy. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the recurrent disk herniations that develop following aggressive discectomy (AD) and sequestrectomy. Materials and Methods: Seventy patients diagnosed with extruded LDH at a single level who underwent sequestrectomy (S) and 70 patients with the same diagnosis who underwent AD at Başkent University Zübeyde Hanım Hospital were enrolled in this study. In the study groups, age, gender, comorbidity characteristics, disk herniation level, duration of surgery, blood loss, hospitalisation duration and complications including recurrence rate, reoperation rate, low back pain postoperatively and visual analogue scale for radicular pain during the last evaluation and analgesic application results were collected in addition to the perioperative information. Results: In the comparison S and AD, recurrence (62.50%) and reoperation rates (57.10%) were found to be higher in patients who underwent sequestrectomy. Although surgical site infection (50.00%) occurred at the same proportion in both groups, the rate of dural tear (66.70%) was found to be higher in those who underwent sequestrectomy. Conclusion: Although several noninvasive procedures have been defined as an alternative to microsurgery, surgical discectomy remains an effective treatment method for LDH. We suggest that for cases of LDH recurrence, AD is more preferred over other surgical methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINEL, F., ŞAHİNTÜRK, F., PEKCAN, Y. Ö. (2020). COMPARISON OF SEQUESTRECTOMY AND AGGRESSIVE DISCECTOMIES IN TERMS OF RECURRENCE IN LUMBAR DISC HERNIA SURGERIES. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 222–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/166672

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Weiss HR, Goodall D. The treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) according to present evidence. A systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44:177-93
  2. Sy Ng, Bettany-Saltikov J, Moramarco M. Evidence for conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis - Update 2015 (MiniReview). Curr Pediatr Rev. 2016;12:6-11
  3. Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Grivas TB, et al. Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD006850
  4. Silva FE, Lenke LG. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In: Errico TJ, Lonner BS, Moulton AW, eds. Surgical Management of Spinal Deformities. Philadelphia, Pa:Saunders Elsevier; 2009:97-118
  5. Fang MQ, Wang C, Xiang GH, Lou C, Tian NF, Xu HZ. Long-term effects of the Ch êneau brace on coronal and sagittal alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23:505-9
  6. Landauer F, Wimmer C, Behensky H. Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6-month followup. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003;6:201-7
  7. Guo J, Lam TP, Wong MS, Wah Ng BK, Lee KM, Liu KL, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardized criteria. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:2650-7
  8. De Giorgi S, Piazzolla A, Tafuri S, Borracci C, Martucci A, De Giorgi G. Chêneau brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: long-term results. Can it prevent surgery? Eur Spine J. 2013;22(Suppl6):S815-22
  9. Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D’Amato CR, Thompson GH. Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:2068-75
  10. Nash CL, Moe JH. A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:223-9
  11. Thompson RM, Hubbard EW, Jo CH, Virostek D, Karol LA. Brace success is related to curve type in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:923-8
  12. Lonstein JE, Carlson JM. The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:1061-71
  13. Cheung JPY, Cheung PWH, Yeng WC, Chan LCK. Does curve regression occur during underarm bracing in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478:334-45
  14. Yrjönen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Poussa M. Results of brace treatm