Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

EFFECTIVENESS OF GENSINGEN BRACE TREATMENT FOR ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Pages
130–134
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The patient’s age, Risser grade, and gender showed no significant association with successful treatment outcomes, although initial Cobb angle, rotation of apical vertebra, and Lenke classification did.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The efficacy of brace treatment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains controversial.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Gensingen brace treatment in patients with AIS (identified using the Scoliosis Research Society inclusion criteria) and explore factors affecting treatment success rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The patient’s age, Risser grade, and gender showed no significant association with successful treatment outcomes, although initial Cobb angle, rotation of apical vertebra, and Lenke classification did.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The efficacy of brace treatment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Gensingen brace treatment in patients with AIS (identified using the Scoliosis Research Society inclusion criteria) and explore factors affecting treatment success rates. Materials and Methods: This study included twenty-five patients diagnosed with AIS and treated using a Gensingen brace between April 2015 and February 2018. Initial brace correction rates and progression of the main curves were evaluated. Treatment outcomes were classified into a) progression if ≥6° increase in curvature was observed and b) improvement in case of ≥6° decrease in curvature. The association between treatment success rate and age, gender, Lenke classification, Risser grade, initial Cobb angle, and rotation grade was examined. Results: The spinal curvature was seen to progress in 13 cases, improve in two cases, and remain unchanged in 10 cases, yielding a success rate of 48% (12/25). Moreover, only three out of 25 cases exhibited progression of the Cobb angle above 45° requiring surgery. The mean pre-brace Cobb angle of the main curves was 27.9°±6.7° (range: 20° to 37°) and the mean duration of brace treatment was 37.2 months (range: 6-76 months). The mean Cobb angle at the end of treatment was 32.1°±8.2° (range: 15° to 45°). Successful treatment outcomes were correlated with initial Cobb angle (r=0.680; p=<0.001), rotation grade (r=-0.458; p=0.028), and main thoracic Lenke classification (r=0.481; p=0.020), although no such association with age and Risser grade was observed. Conclusion: The patient’s age, Risser grade, and gender showed no significant association with successful treatment outcomes, although initial Cobb angle, rotation of apical vertebra, and Lenke classification did.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARALAR, Ş., BAYRAM, S., ALTAN, M., ÖZDEMİR, M. A., AKGÜL, T. (2020). EFFECTIVENESS OF GENSINGEN BRACE TREATMENT FOR ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 130–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/166668

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Weiss HR, Goodall D. The treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) according to present evidence. A systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44:177-93.
  2. Sy Ng, Bettany-Saltikov J, Moramarco M. Evidence for conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis - Update 2015 (MiniReview). Curr Pediatr Rev. 2016;12:6-11.
  3. Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Zaina F, Chockalingam N, Grivas TB, et al. Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD006850 doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD006850.pub2. Silva FE, Lenke LG. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In: Errico TJ, Lonner BS, Moulton AW, (Eds). Surgical Management of Spinal Deformities. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier; 2009;pp:97e118. Fang MQ, Wang C, Xiang GH, Lou C, Tian NF, Xu HZ. Long-term effects of the Ch^eneau brace on coronal and sagittal alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23:505-9.
  4. Landauer F, Wimmer C, Behensky H. Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6-month followup. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003;6:201-7.
  5. Guo J, Lam TP, Wong MS, Ng BKW, Lee KM, Liu KL, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardized criteria. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:2650-7.
  6. De Giorgi S, Piazzolla A, Tafuri S, Borracci C, Martucci A, De Giorgi G. Chêneau brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: long-term results. Can it prevent surgery? Eur Spine J. 2013;22(Suppl 6):S815-22. Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D’Amato CR, Thompson GH. Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine. 2005;30:2068-75.
  7. Nash CL, Moe JH A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:223-9.
  8. Thompson RM, Hubbard EW, Jo CH, Virostek D, Karol LA. Brace Success Is Related to Curve Type in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:923-8.
  9. Lonstein JE, Carlson JM. The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:1061-71.
  10. Cheung JPY, Cheung PWH, Yeng WC, Chan LCK. Does Curve Regression Occur During Underarm Bracing in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478:334-45. Yrjönen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Poussa M. Results of brace treatment of adolescent idiopat