SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4

Psychological resilience and initial reactions to the February 6, 2023 Earthquakes in Türkiye: A mixed-methods approach

Türkiye'de 6 Şubat 2023 depremlerine psikolojik dayanıklılık ve ilk tepkiler: Karma yöntemli bir yaklaşım

Hatice Darga(BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ BUCAK SAĞLIK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0001-6759-6660
Nurten Terkeş(MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BUCAK SAĞLIK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0002-1644-8382
Pages
2175–2197
Publication Date
2025-12-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results offer valuable insights for disaster policy planners, educators, and mental health professionals working to build community resilience in post-disaster contexts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to investigate the psychological resilience levels and behavioral responses of individuals during and after the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş-centered earthquakes in Türkiye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 252 participants, aged 16 and over, residing in nine provinces affected by the earthquake were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results offer valuable insights for disaster policy planners, educators, and mental health professionals working to build community resilience in post-disaster contexts.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Earthquake · psychological resilience · reactions in earthquake

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the psychological resilience levels and behavioral responses of individuals during and after the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş-centered earthquakes in Türkiye. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected using the Brief Resilience Scale and a personal information form, while qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured open-ended questions. A total of 252 participants, aged 16 and over, residing in nine provinces affected by the earthquake were included in the study. Quantitative data were analyzed using non-parametric statistical tests (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Fisher's Exact Test), while qualitative data were analyzed through inductive content analysis using NVivo software. Data triangulation and expert validation were used to ensure rigor and credibility. The study found that male participants and those who had engaged in pre-earthquake preparedness activities had significantly higher psychological resilience levels (p < .01). It was revealed that 94.8% of the participants had no preparedness, and 64.3% had not received training on earthquake response. Qualitative data showed that many participants reported panic, fear, shock, and unprotected waiting during the tremor. While some individuals attempted protective actions like "Drop-Cover-Hold," the majority fled outside and took shelter in cars, tents, or with relatives due to winter conditions. The integration of quantitative and qualitative findings suggests that individuals with prior earthquake preparedness—particularly men—exhibited higher psychological resilience, while the widespread lack of training and preparedness among the majority contributed to panic-driven, unprotected behaviors during the tremor and suboptimal sheltering practices afterward. The findings suggest that gender and prior preparedness are key factors influencing psychological resilience following earthquakes. These results offer valuable insights for disaster policy planners, educators, and mental health professionals working to build community resilience in post-disaster contexts.

Özet

This study aimed to investigate the psychological resilience levels and behavioral responses of individuals during and after the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş-centered earthquakes in Türkiye. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected using the Brief Resilience Scale and a personal information form, while qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured open-ended questions. A total of 252 participants, aged 16 and over, residing in nine provinces affected by the earthquake were included in the study. Quantitative data were analyzed using non-parametric statistical tests (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Fisher's Exact Test), while qualitative data were analyzed through inductive content analysis using NVivo software. Data triangulation and expert validation were used to ensure rigor and credibility. The study found that male participants and those who had engaged in pre-earthquake preparedness activities had significantly higher psychological resilience levels (p < .01). It was revealed that 94.8% of the participants had no preparedness, and 64.3% had not received training on earthquake response. Qualitative data showed that many participants reported panic, fear, shock, and unprotected waiting during the tremor. While some individuals attempted protective actions like "Drop-Cover-Hold," the majority fled outside and took shelter in cars, tents, or with relatives due to winter conditions. The integration of quantitative and qualitative findings suggests that individuals with prior earthquake preparedness—particularly men—exhibited higher psychological resilience, while the widespread lack of training and preparedness among the majority contributed to panic-driven, unprotected behaviors during the tremor and suboptimal sheltering practices afterward. The findings suggest that gender and prior preparedness are key factors influencing psychological resilience following earthquakes. These results offer valuable insights for disaster policy planners, educators, and mental health professionals working to build community resilience in post-disaster contexts

🔖

Cite This Article

Darga, H., Terkeş, N. (2025). Psychological resilience and initial reactions to the February 6, 2023 Earthquakes in Türkiye: A mixed-methods approach. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4, 2175–2197. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1728837

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (60)

  1. Alexander, D. (1990). Behavior during earthquakes: A Southern Italian example. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 8(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072709000800102
  2. Alexander, D. E. (1995). Panic during earthquakes and its urban and cultural contexts. Built Environment 21(2/3), 171-182. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23289014
  3. Angell, J. R. (1915). Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear and rage; an account of recent researches into the function of emotional excitement. By Walter B. Cannon. Science, 42(1089), 696-700. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.42.1089.696.b
  4. Aral, N. (2023). Effects of earthquake on children. Çocuk ve Gelişim Dergisi, 6(11), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.36731/cg.1299175
  5. Bernardini, G., Lovreglio, R., & Quagliarini, E. (2019). Proposing behavior-oriented strategies for earthquake emergency evacuation: A behavioral data analysis from New Zealand, Italy and Japan. Safety Science, 116(July), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.023
  6. Bödvarsdottir, I., & Elklit, A. (2004). Psychological reactions in Icelandic earthquake survivors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00373.x
  7. Buldu, B. (2024). The role of society in the strategy of combating disasters and the importance of disaster training. International Journal of Social and Economic Studies, 5(1), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.62001/gsijses.1456270
  8. Campbell-Sills, L., Cohan, S. L., & Stein, M. B. (2006). Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(4), 585-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.05.001
  9. Canlı, D., & Yılmaz, F. (2024). Evaluation of earthquake anxiety, death anxiety and psychological resilience levels of individuals after the earthquake. Bozok Medical Journal, 14(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.16919/bozoktip.1305106
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2020). Karma yöntem araştırmaları: Tasarımı ve yürütülmesi [Mixed-methods research: Design and execution] (Y. Dede & S. B., DemirTrans.). Ankara: Anı Publishing.
  11. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Sage. https://books.google.com.tr/books
  12. Cumhuriyet Newspaper. (2023). Kahramanmaraş Earthquake. https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/turkiye/son-dakika-yok-bahar-doneminin-acilisi-ikinci-bir-duyuruya-kadar-ertelendi-2050030
  13. Doğan, T. (2015). Psikolojik Sağlamlık Ölçeği’nin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Turkish adaptation of the Brief Psychological Resilience Scale: Validity and reliability study]. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 3(1), 93-102. https://www.tayfundogan.net/wpcontent/uploads/2016/09/K%C4%B1saPsikolojikSaglamlikOlcegi.pdf
  14. Doğulu, C., Karanci, N. A., & Ikizer, G. (2016). How do survivors perceive community resilience? The case of the 2011 earthquakes in Van, Turkey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,16(Special Issue), 108-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.02.006.
  15. Drury, J., Cocking, C., & Reicher, S. (2009). Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 487-506 https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X357893
  16. Duruel, M., & Avşar Arık, İ. (2023). Kırılganlık ve dirençlilik kesişiminde yaşlıların afet deneyimleri: Hatay örneğinde 6 Şubat 2023 depremleri [Disaster experiences of the elderly at the intersection of vulnerability and resilience: The February 6, 2023 earthquakes in Hatay]. Pesa International Journal of Social Studies, 9(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10445745
  17. Enarson, E., Fothergill, A., & Peek, L. (2018). Gender and disaster: Foundations and new directions for research and practice. In H. Rodríguez, W. Donner, & J. Trainor (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 205–223). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_11
  18. Erdoğan, B. (2023). Depremin sosyolojisi: 6 Şubat felaketinin toplumsal ve kültürel boyutları [Sociology of the earthquake: Social and cultural dimensions of the February 6 disaster].TRT Akademi, 8(18), 718-725. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1306900
  19. Erdoğan, C. N., & Aksoy, Ö. N. (2020). Deprem stresi ile baş etme stratejileri: Balıkesir örneği [Coping strategies with earthquake stress: Balikesir example]. Academy of Social Sciences Journal, 3(2), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.38004/sobad.704072
  20. Erkin, Ö., Aslan, G., Öztürk, M., Çam, B., & Ödek, Ş. (2023). Hemşirelerin genel afete hazırlık durumları ve etkileyen faktörler [General disaster preparedness of nurses and factors affecting it]. Forbes Journal of Medicine, 4(3), 305-314. https://doi.org/10.4274/forbes.galenos.2023.32659
  21. Gao, X., Leng, Y., Guo, Y., Yang, J., Cui, Q., Geng, B., Hu, H., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Association between earthquake experience and depression 37 years after the Tangshan earthquake: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 9, e026110. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026110
  22. Gaillard, J. C. (2019). Disaster studies inside out. Disasters, 43(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12323
  23. Gaillard, J. C. (2021). The invention of disaster: Power and knowledge in discourses on hazard and vulnerability. Routledge.
  24. Goltz, J. D., Park, H., Nakano, G., & Yamori, P. (2020). Earthquake ground motion and human behavior: Using DYFI data to assess behavioral response to earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 36(3), 1231-1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019899958
  25. Goodman, A. (2016). In the aftermath of disasters: The impact on women’s health. Critical Care Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2(6), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9803.1000137
  26. Hitoshi, J. (1997). Disaster stress of the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Psychologica,40(3),192-200 https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573668926585975936
  27. İpekçi, N. N. (2023). Afetlerde kırılgan grupların sağlığı [Health of vulnerable groups in disasters]. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Klinik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10445745
  28. Karabulut, D., & Bekler, T. (2019). Doğal afetlerin çocuklar ve ergenler üzerindeki etkileri [Effects of natural disasters on children and adolescents]. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 5(2), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.500356
  29. Karaırmak, Ö., & Güloğlu, B. (2014). Deprem deneyimi yaşamış yetişkinlerde bağlanma modeline göre psikolojik sağlamlığın açıklanması [Explaining psychological resilience according to the attachment model in adults who experienced an earthquake]. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.2014.0010
  30. Kerkez, M., & Şanlı, M. E. (2024). Mediating role of spirituality in the relationship of anxiety, stress and depression with resilience in individuals exposed to earthquakes in Türkiye. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 104(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104347
  31. Kobes, M., Helsloot, I., De Vries, B., & Post, J. G. (2010). Building safety and human behaviour in fire: A literature review. Fire Safety Journal, 45(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.08.005
  32. Köse, A., Partal, İ., & Uzun, M. (2023). Öğretmenlerin psikolojik sağlamlıkları ve yaşam doyumları: 6 Şubat 2023 depremi sonrası bir araştırma [Teachers' psychological resilience and life satisfaction: A study after the 6 February 2023 earthquake]. Gaziantep University Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 94-115. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/guebd/issue/81356/1382934
  33. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=iySQQuUpr8C
  34. Lindell, M. P., Prater, C. S., Wu, H. C., Huang, S. P., Johnston, D. M., Becker, J.S. & Shiroshita, H. (2016). Immediate behavioural responses to earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand, and Hitachi, Japan. Disasters, 40(1), 85-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12133
  35. Martono, M., Satino, S., Nursalam, N., Efendi, F., & Bushy, A. (2019). Indonesian nurses' perception of disaster management preparedness. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 22(1), 41- 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.09.002
  36. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
  37. Nasır, A., Alymany, G., Brimo, F., Tekin, S. & Drury, D. (2025). Understanding the socio-economic and wellbeing impacts of the 2023 earthquakes in Turkey on Syrian refugees. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 125 (July),1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105548
  38. Okuyama, J., Funakoshi, S., Tomita, H., Yamaguchi, T., & Matsuoka, H. (2018). Longitudinal characteristics of resilience among adolescents: A high school student cohort study to assess the psychological impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 72(11), 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12772
  39. Özgölet, B. M., & Utkucu, M. (2021). Depremin yıkıcı etkisiyle başa çıkmada etkili olan etkenler [Factors that are effective in coping with the devastating effects of the earthquake]. International Symposium on Natural Hazards and Disaster Management, 4(2), 89- 98. https://doi.org/10.33793/acperpro.04.02.38
  40. Ozkan, N. (2024). Resilience in Education after the Kahramanmaraş Earthquake February 6, 2023: Threats and Challenges / 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremi Sonrası Eğitimde Dayanaklılığın İncelenmesi. Education & Youth Research, 4(2), 88-110. https://doi.org/10.59041/eyor.1517050
  41. Ozkan, N., & Toker-Gokce, A. (2024). Challenges, innovations and recommendations forstrengthening educational resilience: The post-earthquake experiences of teachers in Kahramanmaraş region. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(3), 158-174. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2024.03.001
  42. Ozkan, Z. (2024a). Understanding protest intentions: The influence of belief systems post-earthquake tragedies, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,115 (December), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105031.
  43. Oztürk, M. O., & Uluşahin, A. (2015). Ruh sağlığı ve bozuklukları [Mental health and disorders] (13th ed.). Nobel Medical Bookstores.
  44. Paton, D., & McClure, J. (2017). Business continuity in disasters contexts. In D. Paton & D. Johnston (Eds.), Disaster resilience: An integrated approach (pp. 79–91). Charles C. Thomas Publisherhttps://researchers.cdu.edu.au/en/publications/business-continuity-in-disaster-contexts
  45. Patton M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 34(5), 1189-208. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1089059/
  46. Patton, M. Q. (2018). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri [Qualitative research and evaluation methods] (M. Tam & S.B. Demir, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Ankara: Pegem Academy
  47. Penley, J. A., Tomaka, J., & Wiebe, J. S. (2002). The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25(6), 551–593. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020641400589
  48. Sakarya, D., & Güneş, C. (2013). Van Depremi sonrasında travma sonrası stres bozukluğu belirtilerinin psikolojik dayanıklılık ile ilişkisi [The relationship between PTSD symptoms and resilience after the Van Earthquake]. Kriz Dergisi, 21(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1501/Kriz_0000000335 Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, P., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bern ard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
  49. Southern California Earthquake Centre. (2024). Earthquake Country Alliance. https://www.earthquakecountry.org (Access: 15.05.2024)
  50. Sönmez, M. B.(2022). Depremin psikolojik etkileri, psikolojik destek ve korkuyla baş etme [Psychological effects of earthquake, psychological support and coping with fear]. TOTBID Journal, 21(3), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.5578/totbid.dergisi.2022.46
  51. Spurrell, M. T., & McFarlane, A. C. (1993). Posttraumatic stress disorder and coping after a natural disaster. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 28(4),194-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00797323
  52. Tang, B., Chen, Q., Chen, X., Glik, D., Liu, X., Liu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2017). Earthquake-related injuries among survivors: A systematic review and quantitative synthesis of the literature. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 21, 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.003
  53. The Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Turkey. (2024). Turkey's power of unity and solidarity was tested by the earthquake. The disaster of the century turned into the solidarity of the century! https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/turkiyenin-birlik-ve-dayanisma-gucu-depremle-sinandi-asrin-felaketi-asrin-dayanismasina-donustu8 (Access:21.07.2025)
  54. Tusaie, P., & Dyer, J. (2004). Resilience: A historical review of the construct. Holistic Nursing Practice, 18(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004650-200401000-00002
  55. Varol, N., & Buluş Kırıkkaya, E. (2017). Afetler karşısında toplum dirençliliği [Community resilience in the face of disasters]. Resilience, 1(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.32569/resilience.344784
  56. Walsh, F. (2020). Loss and resilience in the time of COVID‐19: Meaning making, hope, and transcendence. Family Process, 59(3), 898-911. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12588
  57. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/67072351.pdf (Access: 21.07.2025)
  58. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
  59. Zakian, P., & Paveh, A. (2023). Seismic design optimization of engineering structures: A comprehensive review. Acta Mechanica, 234(4), 1305-1330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-022-03470-6
  60. Zhou, X., Zhen, R., & Wu, X. (2019). Trajectories of academic burnout in adolescents after the Wenchuan earthquake: A latent growth mixture model analysis. School Psychology International, 40(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318810318