SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Development Of Geographical Inquıry Skill Scale For Secondary School Students

Samet Karakuş(Trabzon Üniversitesi)0000-0003-4588-0163
Yavuz Akbaş(TRABZON UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3500-4701
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-02-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Confirmatory factor analysis results showed that the model had acceptable to excellent fit indices (CMIN/DF = 1.38; RMSEA = 0.047; SRMR = 0.05; GFI = 0.91; AGFI = 0.88; IFI = 0.95; CFI = 0.95).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although various measurement tools exist to quantitatively assess geographical inquiry skill, no scale has been specifically developed for secondary school students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The scale consists of 16 items across three subscales: ‘asking and collecting’, ‘organizing, analyzing and concluding’, and ‘sharing’.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Confirmatory factor analysis results showed that the model had acceptable to excellent fit indices (CMIN/DF = 1.38; RMSEA = 0.047; SRMR = 0.05; GFI = 0.91; AGFI = 0.88; IFI = 0.95; CFI = 0.95).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geographical inquiry · secondary school students · validity

Abstract

Although various measurement tools exist to quantitatively assess geographical inquiry skill, no scale has been specifically developed for secondary school students. The aim of this study is to develop a Geographical Inquiry Skill Scale for secondary school students. The scale consists of 16 items across three subscales: ‘asking and collecting’, ‘organizing, analyzing and concluding’, and ‘sharing’. The research was conducted within the scope of a survey model, and data obtained from 421 secondary school students were analyzed. Data analyses were performed using SPSS and LISREL software. Expert opinions were sought to ensure content validity; exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to establish construct validity. The scale's reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, item-total correlations, and the 27% upper-lower group discrimination method. Confirmatory factor analysis results showed that the model had acceptable to excellent fit indices (CMIN/DF = 1.38; RMSEA = 0.047; SRMR = 0.05; GFI = 0.91; AGFI = 0.88; IFI = 0.95; CFI = 0.95). The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for the scale was 0.85, indicating high reliability. Furthermore, all sub-dimensions of the scale demonstrated acceptable convergent validity and composite reliability. The relationships between the sub-dimensions were found statistically significant and moderate. In conclusion, it is suggested that the developed scale can be used to quantitatively determine the geographical inquiry skill levels of secondary school students.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karakuş, S., Akbaş, Y. (2026). Development Of Geographical Inquıry Skill Scale For Secondary School Students. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 15 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1763773

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (51)

  1. Akbağ, M., Aydoğdu, F., & Rizzo, A. (2025). Developing a novel parental phubbing scale of mother and father forms for adolescents in Türkiye: A validity and reliability study. Personality and Individual Differences.
  2. Akça, D. (2014). Coğrafya öğretiminde coğrafi sorgulama becerisinin öğrenci başarısına, tutum ve kalıcılığa etkisi [Yüksek lisans tezi]. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi.
  3. Alpar, R. (2022). Applied statistics and validity and reliability with examples from sports, health and education sciences with analysis steps in SPSS. Detay Publishing.
  4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294170
  5. Aydoğdu, F. (2023). AVE ve CR calculation. Personal webpage. https://www.fuataydogdu.com/avecr
  6. Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
  7. Bednarz, S. W., Heffron, S., & Huynh, N. T. (Eds.). (2013). A road map for 21st century geography education: Geography education research (A report from the Geography Education Research Committee of the Road Map for 21st Century Geography Education Project). Association of American Geographers.
  8. Bruce, C. B., & Casey, L. (2012). The practice of inquiry: A pedagogical ‘sweet spot’ for digital literacy? Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 29(1–2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2012.657994
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2023). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi.
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Scientific research methods. Pegem.
  11. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2023). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.
  12. Davidson, G. (2006). Start at the beginning. Teaching Geography, 31(3), 105-108.
  13. Demirci, A. (2006). Coğrafya öğretiminde coğrafi sorgulama becerisinin geliştirilmesi ve kullanımı. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 0(14), 61-80.
  14. DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  15. Edelson, D. C., Shavelson, R. J., & Wertheim, J. A. (Eds.). (2013). A road map for 21st century geography education: Assessment (A report from the Assessment Committee of the Road Map for 21st Century Geography Education Project). Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
  16. ESRI (2025). Getting to Know GeoInquiries an intro to teaching with maps https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/939b0102d1bb4af380edc6d9de2e5cc4
  17. Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE.
  18. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
  19. Gudekli, A., Deren Van Het Hof, S., Eser, M. T., & Oruc, M. S. (2022). News media literacy scale: Validity and reliability study. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 65, 61–80. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2021-837512
  20. Gürbüz, S, Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayınları. Ankara.
  21. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  22. Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
  23. Hsu, L., & Wu, P. (2013). Electronic-tablet-based menu in a full service restaurant and customer satisfaction — a structural equation model. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 3(2), 61–71.
  24. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional
  25. Kaçar, T. ve Çakmak, Z. (2020). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde sorgulamaya dayalı öğretimin öğrencilerin ders başarısına, eleştirel düşünme becerilerine ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığına etkisi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(76), 1651-1672.
  26. Kanbay, Y., Firat, M., Akcam, A., Cinar, S., & Ozbay, Z.(2021). Development of Firat netlessphobia scaleand investigation of its psychometric properties.Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 58(4), 1258-1266.https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12924
  27. Kanchanapibul, M., Lacka, E., Wang, X., & Chan, H. K. (2014). An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 528–536.
  28. Karagöz, Y. (2014). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  29. Karasar, N. (2022). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi – Kavramlar İlkeler Teknikler 37. Baskı. Ankara:Nobel Yayınları.
  30. Kidman, N., & Casinader, G. (2017). Inquiry-based teaching and learning across disciplines comparative theory and practice in schools. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
  31. Kılıç, A. F. (2022). "Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizinde Boyut Sayısına Karar Verme: Yöntemlere Kısa Bir Bakış", Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2022 Sayı 51: Özel sayı 1, Denizli, ss. Ö305-Ö318.
  32. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
  33. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  34. Mayerl, J. (2016). Environmental concern in cross-national comparison: Methodological threats and measurement
  35. National Geographic Society (2017), The geo-inquiry process: Educator guide, National Geographic Society, Washington,DC.https://media.nationalgeographic.org/assets/file/Educator_Guide_Geo_Inquiry_Final_2.pdf
  36. Oberle, A. Joy Bess, Kelsey Ehmke, Shelley Rath & Amber Robbins (2019) Geo-Inquiry: Informed Action to Make Our World a Better Place, The Geography Teacher, 16:4, 170-178, DOI: 10.1080/19338341.2019.1662467
  37. Ramos, C., Costa, P.A., Rudnicki, T., et al. (2018). The effectiveness of a group intervention to facilitate posttraumatic growth among women with breast cancer. Psycho‐Oncology, (27),258–264. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.4501
  38. Roberts, M. (2003). Learning through enquiry: Making sense of geography in the key stage 3. Geographical Association.
  39. Roberts, M. (2010). Geographical enquiry. Teaching Geography, 35(1), 6-9.
  40. Roberts, M. (2013). Geography through enquiry. Sheffield: Geographical Association
  41. Sadykova, B., Yesnazarova, U., & Tokbergenova, A. (2023). The geographic inquiry process skills scale: A validation study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(9), em2319. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13471
  42. Şencan, N. (2005).Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik, Ankara: Türkiye, Seçkin Yayıncılık, ss:105-403
  43. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  44. Tavşancıl, E. (2019). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi (6th ed.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  45. Tezci, E. (2016). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme (1st ed.). Detay Yayıncılık.
  46. Türkiye Century Education Model (2024). Geographic inquiry skill. (https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/)
  47. Ural, A., & Kılıç, İ. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Detay.
  48. Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74–85.
  49. Yiğit-Özüdoğru, H. (2021). Coğrafya eğitiminde coğrafi sorgulama becerilerinin değerlendirilmesi [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Gazi Üniversitesi.
  50. Yiğit-Özudoğru, Y. H., & Demiralp, N. (2022). Developing a geographic inquiry process skills scale. Education Inquiry, 13(3), 374-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1864883
  51. Yurdugül, H. (2006). Paralel, eşdeğer ve konjenerik ölçmelerde güvenirlik katsayılarının karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1), 15–37.