SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Issue: 2

Exploring Intelligibility Across World Englishes: A VGT-Based Empirical Analysis

Dünya İngilizcelerinde Anlaşılabilirliğin İncelenmesi: VGT Tabanlı Ampirik Bir Araştırma

İrem Yılmaz(Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi)0000-0002-6951-8145
Nuray Alagözlü(Hacettepe University)0000-0001-9868-4399
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-18
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results may not verify the dominance of native varieties over non-native ones, yet they ensure that the more students are exposed to different varieties, the more they become able to comprehend and possibly communicate in them.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For many decades, English has functioned as a lingua franca that enables people with different mother tongues to communicate to maintain their daily or professional lives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This test has been applied to 200 preparatory school students at two different high-scale state universities, and its results have been analyzed by using Jamovi.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results may not verify the dominance of native varieties over non-native ones, yet they ensure that the more students are exposed to different varieties, the more they become able to comprehend and possibly communicate in them.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:comprehension · World Englishes · intelligibility

Abstract

For many decades, English has functioned as a lingua franca that enables people with different mother tongues to communicate to maintain their daily or professional lives. As the linguistic and acoustic features of their native languages differ, the way they use English differs, as well. These World Englishes have the possibility of going extreme, creating varieties which are incomprehensible to one another. These intelligibility issues can be prevented in some ways, one of which is to make sure the education system aims to familiarize learners with different varieties. In order to test this and help educational authorities take action if necessary, this study examines the comprehension levels of intermediate students who currently study at university. The comprehension test employing VGT to avoid bias is completed with the help of audio tracks recorded by real speakers in six different varieties. This test has been applied to 200 preparatory school students at two different high-scale state universities, and its results have been analyzed by using Jamovi. British English took the lead in comprehension, while Indian and American Englishes were realized to be the least comprehended varieties in this study. The results may not verify the dominance of native varieties over non-native ones, yet they ensure that the more students are exposed to different varieties, the more they become able to comprehend and possibly communicate in them.

Özet

İngilizce, onlarca yıldır farklı anadil sahiplerinin günlük ve mesleki iletişimlerini sürdürebilmelerini sağlayan bir ortak dil olarak işlev görmektedir. Ancak, bireylerin ana dillerinin dilbilgisel ve akustik özellikleri farklı olduğundan, İngilizceyi kullanma biçimleri de çeşitlilik göstermektedir. Bu Dünya İngilizceleri zamanla birbirleri tarafından anlaşılamayan çeşitler oluşturabilir. Anlaşılırlık sorunlarını önlemenin yollarından biri, eğitim sistemlerinin öğrencileri farklı İngilizce çeşitleriyle tanıştırmayı hedeflemesidir. Bu çalışmada, üniversite düzeyinde eğitim gören orta düzey öğrencilerin farklı İngilizce çeşitlerini anlama düzeyleri incelenmiştir. Önyargıyı azaltmak amacıyla VGT (Verbal Guise Technique) kullanılmış ve altı farklı İngilizce çeşidini konuşan gerçek konuşmacılar tarafından hazırlanan sesli materyallerle anlama testi uygulanmıştır. Test, iki büyük ölçekli devlet üniversitesinde toplam 200 hazırlık sınıfı öğrencisine uygulanmış ve sonuçlar Jamovi programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, anlamada İngiliz İngilizcesinin öne çıktığını, Hint ve Amerikan İngilizcelerinin ise en az anlaşılan çeşitler olduğunu göstermektedir. Elde edilen veriler, yerli İngilizce çeşitlerinin üstünlüğünü kanıtlamasa da, öğrencilerin farklı çeşitlere daha fazla maruz kalmaları durumunda hem anlama hem de iletişim becerilerinin artacağını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu sonuçlar, eğitim politikalarının ve müfredat tasarımının Dünya İngilizcelerine yer vermesi gerektiğini desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yılmaz, İ., Alagözlü, N. (2026). Exploring Intelligibility Across World Englishes: A VGT-Based Empirical Analysis. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1790278

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (93)

  1. Akçay, A. (2020). Perceptions of Turkish EFL instructors and their students on native and non-native accents of English and English as a lingua franca (ELF) (Master's thesis). Bilkent University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  2. Amano, N. (2019). Intelligibility and comprehensibility of Japanese speakers of English from a global Englishes perspective (Doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford.
  3. Baptiste, C. (2022). Second language teachers’ and students’ attitudes toward World Englishes: factors of comprehensibility and accent perception and acceptance. DiVA Portal. https://www.diva-portal.org/
  4. Bayard, D., Weatherall, A., Gallois, C., & Pittam, J. (2001). Pax Americana? Accent attitudinal evaluations in New Zealand, Australia and America. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00136
  5. Bolton, K. (2008). English in Asia, Asian Englishes, and the issue of proficiency. English Today, 24(2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026607840800014x
  6. Bozoglan, H., & Gok, D. (2017). Effect of mobile-assisted dialect awareness training on the dialect attitudes of prospective English language teachers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(9), 772–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2016.1260572
  7. Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511732959
  8. Büyükahıska, D., & Uyar, A. C. (2019). The effects of different accents on listening comprehension in EFL classes. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 14(20), 1369–1394.
  9. Chan, K. L. R. (2021). Verbal guise test: Problems and solutions. Academia Letters, 1493. https://doi.org/10.20935/al1493
  10. Chiba, R., Matsuura, H., & Yamamoto, A. (1995). Japanese attitudes toward English accents. World Englishes, 14(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.1995.tb00341.x
  11. Chuan, C. L., & Penyelidikan, J. (2006). Sample size estimation using Krejcie and Morgan and Cohen statistical power analysis: A comparison. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL, 7(1), 78–86.
  12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290095
  13. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Crossley, S. A., Yang, H. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). What's so simple about simplified texts? A computational and psycholinguistic investigation of text comprehension and text processing. Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/66686
  15. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  16. Crystal, D. (2012). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Custred, G. (1990). The primacy of standard language in modern education. American Behavioral Scientist, 34(2), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764290034002011
  18. Dauer, R. M. (2005). The lingua franca core: A new model for pronunciation instruction?. Tesol Quarterly, 39(3), 543–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588494
  19. Derwing, T. M. & M. J. Munro. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263197001010
  20. Deterding, D., & A. Kirkpatrick. (2006). Emerging South-East Asian Englishes and Intelligibility. World Englishes, 25, 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.2006.00478.x
  21. Dewaele, J. M., & McCloskey, J. (2015). Attitudes towards foreign accents among adult multilingual language users. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(3), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2014.909445
  22. Dewey, M. (2012). Towards a post-normative approach: Learning the pedagogy of ELF. Journal of English as a lingua franca, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2012-0007
  23. Doloricon, J., & Langga, P. M. (2022). Intelligibility of select world Englishes and the factors affecting it: The case of high school ESL learners. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5(8), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.8.8
  24. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
  25. Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511575945
  26. Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2015). Introducing global Englishes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734347
  27. Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2018). Incorporating Global Englishes into the ELT classroom. ELT journal, 72(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx010
  28. Gargesh, R. (2008). Indian English: Phonology. In R. Mesthrie (Ed.), Varieties of English: Africa, South and Southeast Asia (pp. 90–108). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208429.1.231
  29. Gass, S. and E. M. Varonis. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34(1), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00996.x
  30. Giles, H. (1970). Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review, 22 (3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191700220301
  31. Hansen Edwards, J. G., Zampini, M. L., & Cunningham, C. (2018). The accentedness, comprehensibility, and intelligibility of Asian Englishes. World Englishes, 37(4), 538–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12344
  32. Hariri, A., Munir, A., & Anam, S. (2019). Lecturers' Attitudes towards English Varieties Exposure in Indonesia. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 10(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.15642/nobel.2019.10.2.163-173
  33. Hiraga, Y. (2005). British attitudes towards six varieties of English in the USA and Britain. World Englishes, 24(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0883-2919.2005.00411.x
  34. Huensch, A., & Nagle, C. (2021). The effect of speaker proficiency on intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish: A conceptual replication and extension of Munro and Derwing (1995a). Language Learning, 71(3), 626–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12451
  35. International House Archive. (1979). International house brochure. http://www.ihlondon.com
  36. Jenkins, Jennifer. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford University Press.
  37. Jenkins, J. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264515
  38. Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a lingua franca: attitude and identity. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.300
  39. Jenkins, J. (2009). English as a lingua franca: Interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, 28(2), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.2009.01582.x
  40. Jeong, H., Sánchez Ruiz, R., & Wilhelmsson, G. (2022). Spanish and Swedish pre-service teachers’ ELF user attitudes towards English and its users. Changing English, 29(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684x.2021.2022976
  41. Jindapitak, N., Teo, A., & Savski, K. (2022). Bringing Global Englishes to the ELT classroom: English language learners’ reflections. Asian Englishes, 24(3), 279 –293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2022.2033910
  42. Jung, M. Y. (2010). The Intelligibility and Comprehensibility of World Englishes to Non-Native Speakers. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 141–163.
  43. Kachru, B. B. (1985). “Standards, Codification and Sociolinguistic Realism: The English Language in the Outer Circle.”. English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures, 11, 30.
  44. Kachru, B. B. (1986). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions, and models of non-native Englishes. University of Illinois Press.
  45. Kachru, B. B. (1996). World Englishes: agony and ecstasy. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 30(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333196
  46. Kachru, B. B. (1997). World Englishes and English-using communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500003287
  47. Kamper, H., Mukanya, F. J. M., & Niesler, T. (2012). Multi-accent acoustic modelling of South African English. Speech Communication, 54(6), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2012.01.008
  48. Kang, T., Arvizu, M. N. G., Chaipuapae, P., & Lesnov, R. O. (2019). Reviews of academic English listening tests for non-native speakers. International Journal of Listening, 33(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1185210
  49. Kilickaya, F. (2009). World Englishes, English as an International Language and Applied Linguistics. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n3p35
  50. Kim, T. (2008). Accentedness, comprehensibility, intelligibility, and interpretability of NNESTs. The CATESOL Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/b5.36263
  51. Kirkpatrick, A., Deterding, D., & Wong, J. (2008). The international intelligibility of Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 27(3‐4), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.2008.00573.x
  52. Kongkerd, W., (2013). Teaching English in the era of English used as a lingua franca in Thailand. Executive Journal, 33(4), 3–12.
  53. Kuo, I. C. (2006). Addressing the issue of teaching English as a lingua franca. ELT journal, 60(3), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl001
  54. Kurtuldu, E., & Ozkan, Y. (2022). The Investigation of different English accents on listening comprehension. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 22(2), 50–62.
  55. Ladegaard, H. J., & Sachdev, I. (2006). ‘I like the Americans… But I certainly don't aim for an American accent’: Language attitudes, vitality and foreign language learning in Denmark. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630608668542
  56. Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R., Gardner, R. C. & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluative reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430
  57. Lambert, W. E. (1967). A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of social issues, 23(2), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00578.x
  58. Levin, D. M. (1997). Japanese intelligibility and comprehensibility assessments of different English accents. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7185
  59. Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485
  60. Morrow, P. R. (2004). English in Japan: the world Englishes perspective. JALT Journal, 26(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.37546/jaltjj26.1-4
  61. Mesthrie, R. (2010). World Englishes. Cambridge University Press.
  62. Moinzadeh, A., Rezaei, O., & Dezhara, S. (2012). The Effect of Non-native Accent on Iranian EFL Learners' Listening Comprehension, Focusing on Persian Accent of English. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.5.967-972
  63. Mufwene, S. S. (1988). English pidgins: Form and function. World Englishes 7(3). 255–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.1988.tb00236.x
  64. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language learning, 45(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x
  65. Munro, M. J. and T. M. Derwing. (2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 451–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263101004016
  66. Nagy, T. (2016). English as a lingua franca and its implications for teaching English as a foreign language. Acta Universitatis sapientiae, philologica, 8(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/ausp-2016-0024
  67. Nelson, C. (1982). Intelligibility and non-native varieties of English. The other tongue: English across cultures, 15, 59–73.
  68. Northrup, D. (2013). How English became the global language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137303073
  69. Ockey, G. J., & French, R. (2016). From one to multiple accents on a test of L2 listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 693–715. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu060
  70. Öztürk, C. Y. (2019). Accent as an Attitudinal Object: Turkish Prospective English Language Teachers’ Perceptions and Evaluations of Different Varieties of English (Master's thesis). Middle East Technical University.
  71. Pavlou, S. (1990). The suppression of the Greek language in Cyprus. Athens: Pentadahtylos.
  72. Pérez-Ramón, R., Lecumberri, M. L. G., & Cooke, M. (2022). Foreign accent strength and intelligibility at the segmental level. Speech Communication, 137, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2022.01.005
  73. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
  74. Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. M. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61(1), 325–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00640.x
  75. Quirk, R. (1990). Language varieties and standard language. English Today, 21, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078400004454
  76. Rao, P. S. (2019). The role of English as a global language. Research Journal of English, 4(1), 65–79.
  77. Schneider, E. W. (2025). World Englishes as Components of a Complex Dynamic System. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009289504
  78. Seidlhofer, B. (2005). English as a lingua franca. ELT journal, 59(4), 339–341. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci064
  79. Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  80. Smith, L. E., & Nelson, C. L. (2019). World Englishes and issues of intelligibility. The handbook of world Englishes, 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119147282.ch24
  81. Sung, C. C. M. (2014). English as a lingua franca and global identities: Perspectives from four second language learners of English in Hong Kong. Linguistics and Education, 26, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.010
  82. Sung, C. C. M. (2016). Exposure to multiple accents of English in the English Language Teaching classroom: from second language learners' perspectives. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.936869
  83. Tajeddin, Z., & Pakzadian, M. (2020). Representation of inner, outer and expanding circle varieties and cultures in global ELT textbooks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00089-9
  84. Verbeke, G., & Simon, E. (2023). Listening to accents: Comprehensibility, accentedness and intelligibility of native and non-native English speech. Lingua, 292, 103572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103572
  85. Vivas-Peraza, A. C. (2023). Teaching English as a Lingua Franca and the Intercultural Communicative Competence in Spanish secondary education: Exploring multimodal textbook.
  86. Wagner, E., & Toth, P.D. (2014). A product-oriented approach to the validation of a L2 listening test. Language Testing, 31(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12091
  87. Walt, C. V. D. (2000). The international comprehensibility of varieties of South African English. World Englishes, 19(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971x.00165
  88. Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587438
  89. Xie, X., & Fowler, C. A. (2013). Listening with a foreign-accent: The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in Mandarin speakers of English. Journal of phonetics, 41(5), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.06.003
  90. Yan, Q., & Vaseghi, S. (2002, May). A comparative analysis of UK and US English accents in recognition and synthesis. In Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2002 IEEE International Conference (Vol. 1, pp. I-413). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp.2002.5743742
  91. Yiakoumetti, A. (2007). Choice of classroom language in bidialectal communities: To include or to exclude the dialect?. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640601179046
  92. Yildiz, B. K. (2017). The Effects of Speaker's Accent on Listening Comprehension Tests. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 9(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2017.21.5.537
  93. Yilmaz, İ. (2020). Pre-service and in-service English language teachers’ attitudes towards English dialects and dialect self-awareness (Master’s thesis). Hacettepe University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/