Journals / Türkiye Mesleki ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi - JOVOSST / 2026 / Cilt: 8

Algorithmic personalization has become a key strategy, impacting how customers make spontaneous purchases and their lifetime value - Evidence from Brazil and Indonesia

Algoritmik Kişiselleştirme, Müşterilerin Anlık Satın Alma Davranışlarını ve Yaşam Boyu Değerlerini Etkileyen Temel Bir Strateji Hâline Gelmiştir: Brezilya ve Endonezya’dan Bulgular

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It inverts the perception of transparency and perceived control as a second-order ethical issue, and sustainable CLV in the era of algorithms is a kind of trust-building process by literally empowering governance, in the company and/or the supply chain benefit.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:While the effect of algorithmic personalization on impulse purchasing or consumer lifetime value with respect to the latter is under-researched both theoretically and empirically, researchers have a good sense of how algorithmic personalization has shaped consumers' behavior and attitudes toward the so-called “fast-changing” algorithmic personalization in e-business.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The current study is grounded in the literature and builds an integrated conceptual work model that utilizes a multi-dimensional pathway of perceived value as the mediating variable and algorithmic transparency and perceived control as the proposed influencing variables on consumer trust and trust's effect on CLV, in addition to control variables of personality, power distance, and digital literacy; the model is PLS-SEM-based.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It inverts the perception of transparency and perceived control as a second-order ethical issue, and sustainable CLV in the era of algorithms is a kind of trust-building process by literally empowering governance, in the company and/or the supply chain benefit.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:algoritmik kişiselleştirme · dürtüsel satın alma · algılanan kontrol

Abstract

While the effect of algorithmic personalization on impulse purchasing or consumer lifetime value with respect to the latter is under-researched both theoretically and empirically, researchers have a good sense of how algorithmic personalization has shaped consumers' behavior and attitudes toward the so-called “fast-changing” algorithmic personalization in e-business. The current study is grounded in the literature and builds an integrated conceptual work model that utilizes a multi-dimensional pathway of perceived value as the mediating variable and algorithmic transparency and perceived control as the proposed influencing variables on consumer trust and trust's effect on CLV, in addition to control variables of personality, power distance, and digital literacy; the model is PLS-SEM-based. All seven hypotheses tested based on the cross-sectional data of N = 177 adult digital consumers in Brazil ( n = 76 ) and Indonesia (n = 101) collected in October - November 2025 were validated. Algorithmically personalized impulse buying behavior has a positive impact on algorithmic personalization, but to some extent, this impact is mediated by the perceived price (indirect = 0.187) and emotional and social value. Some of the factors that promote this impulse response include Extraversion and Digital self-efficacy. The path between algorithmic transparency and consumer trust is partly adopted, but consumer trust (42.9 percent) is the most important mediator of the pathway, and nearly a quarter (20) percent of the total pathway. Further and importantly, consumer trust does not present a perceived variable that can be considered to be the biggest (b =0.612, f2= 0.489). High perceived control and high transparency are theoretically a synergy and higher than the sum of their parts (which is generally a high level between low vs high power distance and digitally literate consumers). A multi-group analysis indicates that the transparency-control interaction is significant when there is the moderating effect of cultural context and that the main structural paths are not specified by cultural context. It inverts the perception of transparency and perceived control as a second-order ethical issue, and sustainable CLV in the era of algorithms is a kind of trust-building process by literally empowering governance, in the company and/or the supply chain benefit.

Özet

Algoritmik kişiselleştirmenin dürtüsel satın alma ve müşteri yaşam boyu değeri üzerindeki etkisi teorik ve ampirik açıdan yeterince araştırılmamış olmakla birlikte, algoritmik kişiselleştirmenin e-ticaret ortamında tüketici davranışlarını ve tüketicilerin hızla değişen algoritmik uygulamalara yönelik tutumlarını önemli ölçüde şekillendirdiği bilinmektedir. Bu çalışma, ilgili literatüre dayanarak bütünleşik bir kavramsal araştırma modeli geliştirmektedir. PLS-SEM temelli modelde, algılanan değerin çok boyutlu yapısı aracı değişken olarak ele alınırken algoritmik şeffaflık ve algılanan kontrolün tüketici güveni üzerindeki etkisi ile tüketici güveninin müşteri yaşam boyu değeri (CLV) üzerindeki etkisi incelenmektedir. Ayrıca kişilik, güç mesafesi ve dijital okuryazarlık kontrol değişkenleri olarak modele dâhil edilmiştir. Ekim–Kasım 2025 döneminde Brezilya’dan 76 ve Endonezya’dan 101 olmak üzere toplam 177 yetişkin dijital tüketiciden kesitsel veriler toplanmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında test edilen yedi hipotezin tamamı desteklenmiştir. Bulgular, algoritmik kişiselleştirmenin dürtüsel satın alma davranışını olumlu yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Bu etkiye kısmen algılanan fiyat değeri (dolaylı etki = 0,187) ile duygusal ve sosyal değer aracılık etmektedir. Dışa dönüklük ve dijital öz yeterlilik de dürtüsel satın alma tepkisini güçlendiren faktörler arasında yer almaktadır. Algoritmik şeffaflık ile tüketici güveni arasındaki ilişki kısmen desteklenmiştir. Tüketici güveni, açıklanan varyansın %42,9’unu oluşturarak ilgili etki mekanizmasının en önemli aracısı olarak ortaya çıkmış ve toplam etkinin yaklaşık %20’sine aracılık etmiştir. Ayrıca tüketici güveninin modeldeki en güçlü yordayıcı değişken olduğu belirlenmiştir (β = 0,612; f² = 0,489). Yüksek düzeyde algılanan kontrol ile yüksek algoritmik şeffaflık arasında teorik açıdan sinerjik bir etkileşim bulunmaktadır ve bu ortak etki, iki unsurun bağımsız etkilerinin toplamından daha güçlüdür. Bu etki; güç mesafesi düşük tüketiciler ile dijital okuryazarlık düzeyi yüksek tüketiciler arasında daha belirgindir. Çoklu grup analizi, algoritmik şeffaflık ile algılanan kontrol arasındaki etkileşimin kültürel bağlamın düzenleyici etkisi altında anlamlı olduğunu; buna karşılık temel yapısal ilişkilerin kültürel bağlama göre önemli ölçüde farklılaşmadığını göstermektedir. Çalışma, algoritmik şeffaflık ve algılanan kontrolün ikincil etik meseleler olarak değerlendirilmesi anlayışını tersine çevirmektedir. Algoritmalar çağında sürdürülebilir müşteri yaşam boyu değeri, tüketicileri somut biçimde güçlendiren yönetişim uygulamaları aracılığıyla gerek işletme gerekse tedarik zinciri düzeyinde gerçekleştirilen bir güven inşa süreci olarak değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mohsin, H. Y. (2026). Algorithmic personalization has become a key strategy, impacting how customers make spontaneous purchases and their lifetime value - Evidence from Brazil and Indonesia. Türkiye Mesleki ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi - JOVOSST, Cilt: 8. https://ajindex.com/articles/1664764

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (40)

  1. Aydın, O., Baday Yıldız, E., Hızarcı, A. E., Sözüer, A., Ocak, A., & Gülmez, Y. S. (2025). *Marketing dynamics in the digital age: Platforms, ecosystems, and innovation* (T. Yolcu, Ed.). Özgür Yayınları. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub1133
  2. Beninger, S., Reppel, A., Stanton, J., & Watson, F. (2025). Facilitating generative AI literacy in the face of evolving technology: Interventions in marketing classrooms. *Journal of Marketing Education, 47*(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753251316569
  3. Borah, A., Banerjee, S., Lin, Y.-T., Jain, A., & Eisingerich, A. B. (2020). Improvised marketing interventions in social media. *Journal of Marketing, 84*(2), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919899383
  4. Brown, M. R. C., Wells, V. K., & Beale, C. M. (2026). Assessing the integration of social marketing principles in ivory demand management interventions in China and Southeast Asia. *Conservation Biology, 40*(2), e70191. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70191
  5. Deshmukh, S., Gupta, D., Pal, K., & Srivastava, M. (2025). Hyper-personalization vs. consumer privacy—Balancing predictive marketing and ethical concerns. *9*(2).
  6. Ezekwe, C. I. (2025). International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS). *SSRN Electronic Journal*. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5065151
  7. Fadilah, N., Masarroh, I., & Wildan, M. A. (2025). Effectiveness of recommendation algorithms on impulsive buying in e-commerce platforms: A systematic literature review. *Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 5*(8), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i8.485
  8. Farras, J. I., & Dwisanto, R. R. (2025). Algorithm effectiveness in digital content. *4*(2).
  9. Gimpl, N. (2025). The wisdom of electronic employee crowds—Employee reviews as a data source in finance, accounting, economics, and management research: A systematic literature review. *Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 32*(2), e70007. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.70007
  10. Graham, L., & Matidza, K. (2026). Risks, rewards and responsibilities: Lessons from South African platform workers for achieving decent work. *Global Social Policy, 26*(2), 326–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181261457292
  11. Guo, Z., & Wang, W. (2026). Does gig economy reshape accrual properties? Evidence from Uber entry. *SSRN Electronic Journal*. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6030554
  12. Haque, A., Rupa, R. A., Faisal-E-Alam, M., Akter, M. S., & Sultana, N. (2026). From click to regret: Investigating impulsive buying and post-purchase cognitive dissonance through the S-O-R lens. *Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 21*(3), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21030090
  13. Jabbari, O., & Lamari, S. (2024). *Customer experience in the digital transformation era: Insights on personalization, digital marketing, and customer relationship management*. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.14109688
  14. Kaponis, A., Maragoudakis, M., & Sofianos, K. C. (2024). *Enhancing user experiences in digital marketing through machine learning: Cases, trends, and challenges*. Computer Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202411.1358.v1
  15. Khoso, R. A., Soomro, F. A., Hamza, M. A., & Syed, M. I. (2026). The future of work in digital banking: Aligning HR tech adoption with marketing innovation and financial KPIs. *Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 5*(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.63544/ijss.v5i1.225
  16. Kolisnichenko, P., Vynogradova, О., Somkina, T., Romshchenko, O., & Darchuk, V. (2025). *Chapter 3 modern management technologies* (3).
  17. Liu, R., & Fan, H. (2026). Research on the nonlinear mechanism of gig workers’ perception of algorithmic control and their counterproductive work behaviors. *Sustainability, 18*(5), 2244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052244
  18. Luo, Y., Kumar, N., & Yazdanmehr, A. (2024). *AI nudging and decision quality: Evidence from randomized experiments in online recommendation setting*. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4967812
  19. Mufti, H., Fauzi, D. U., & Putra, T. R. (2026). Algorithmic management in the future of work: A systematic literature review in the context of gig workers. *Bisman (Bisnis Dan Manajemen): The Journal of Business and Management, 9*(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.36815/bisman.v9i1.4589
  20. Muneer, S., Choudhary, M. H., Dastgeer, G., Qureshi, M. I., & Bhatti, S. M. (2026). From blocks to balance sheets: Employee outcomes in AI-enhanced blockchain FinTech. *Acta Psychologica, 264*, 106416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106416
  21. Nadroh, U., Nurrohman, R., & Hakim, A. F. (2025). Algorithmic curation’s influence on impulsive buying: Mediating role of urge in TikTok. *05*(04).
  22. Nanda, P. K. (2026). The algorithmic personalization paradox: Gig workers’ lived experiences of supportive coaches and micromanaging bosses. *Journal of Managerial Psychology*, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2025-0987
  23. Nurmalasari, E., Hartini, I., Putri, R. A., & Soesilo, P. K. M. (2024). Effect of FOMO and hedonic value on impulsive buying and post purchase regret for purchasing skincare products at the online shop. *AMAR (Andalas Management Review), 8*(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.25077/amar.8.1.1-21.2024
  24. Ogbidi, L., & Oteh, B. (2024). Advances in hybrid machine learning and physics-based models for enhanced reservoir simulation. *International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10*(6), 2533–2543. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCSEIT
  25. Parvez, T., & Kaushik, H. (2026). Understanding digital nudges in e-commerce: An interpretative structural modeling-based analysis of impulse buying behavior. *Journal of Emerging Markets and Management, 2*(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.63385/jemm.v2i1.341
  26. Pornpitakpan, C. (2026). *Peer-proximity analysis (PPA) of GEMS’ visibility in Grafiati bibliographic lists: Implications for interdisciplinary prestige and open-access publishing*. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.19246935
  27. Rachmat, B. (2026). Algorithm-driven personalization, content exposure, and live commerce: The roles of engagement and trust in Gen Z impulse buying on TikTok Shop. *Innovative Marketing, 22*(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.22(2).2026.13
  28. Rafieian, O., Kapoor, A., & Sharma, A. (2025). Multiobjective personalization of marketing interventions. *Marketing Science, 44*(2), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0122
  29. Rahmawati, Primanto, A. B., Arifin, R., & Mohd Salleh, M. Z. (2025). When credibility meets narrative: Dual mechanisms driving consumer brand engagement. *Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan | Journal of Theoretical and Applied Management, 18*(3), 380–395. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v18i3.79988
  30. Stephan, A. (2024). The effect of algorithmic trading on management guidance. *The Accounting Review, 99*(6), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2022-0080
  31. Sukontip, W., Sureerut, I., & Athanasios, P. (2024). Influence of brand generated content’s credibility on customer behavior response through positive user generated content. *TEM Journal*. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM134-25
  32. Wang, Y., Tang, H., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., & Liu, X. (2026). From immersion to purchase: How live streaming catalyzes impulse buying among consumers. *Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 21*(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21020068
  33. Westerbeek, H. (2025). Algorithmic fandom: How generative AI is reshaping sports marketing, fan engagement, and the integrity of sport. *Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7*, 1597444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1597444
  34. Wu, J., Yang, W., Qi, J., & Zhang, W. (2026). Not all algorithmic controls are equal: The double-edged impact of algorithmic control dimensions on mental health and risky riding behavior among food delivery riders. *Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13*(1), 554. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06909-6
  35. Xilai, Q., Bashir, T., Naseem, A., Gul, R. F., & Sadiq, B. (2026). A dual-process psychological model of impulse buying in digital commerce: Evidence from livestream and marketplace contexts. *Frontiers in Psychology, 17*, 1774474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1774474
  36. Yarrow, E., & Davies, J. (Eds.). (2025). *Worker well-being, human factors and the gig economy: Interdisciplinary perspectives*. CRC Press.
  37. Yuan, Z. (2025). From the synergistic perspective of company law and labor law: Resolving legal disputes and compliance pathways in enterprise human resource management—A China-based case study. *Cadernos de Dereito Actual*, (29), 173–191.
  38. Yurendira, D. V., Usman, O., & Berutu, M. B. (2025). The influence of brand credibility, technological innovation, and user engagement on the effectiveness of AI and its impact on the reader loyalty of Liputan6.com digital media platform readers. *Journal of Digital Business and Global Economy, 1*(3). https://doi.org/10.64243/JODIGBI.01.3.01
  39. Zhang, X. (2026). The impact mechanism of social media algorithmic recommendations on consumers’ impulse buying. *Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 260*(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2026.BJ31775
  40. Zhu, J., Cao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). The “double-edged sword” effect of perceived algorithmic control on platform workers’ work engagement. *Behavioral Sciences, 16*(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010033