Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Female Sterilization by Tubal Ligation During C-Section in Women with a History of 2 or More C-Sections

Pages
7–11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In one fourth of the cases, pregnant women did not want bilateral tubal ligation due to religious beliefs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine bilateral tubal ligation incidence performed during C-section in women with a history of 2 or more C-sections and the factors affecting sterilization demand.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: Patients who were admitted to Zekai Tahir Burak Woman's Health, Education and Research Hospital between February 2017 and June 2017 and who had a history of 2 or more C-sections between week 37 and 41 were included in this prospective cross-sectional study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In one fourth of the cases, pregnant women did not want bilateral tubal ligation due to religious beliefs.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine bilateral tubal ligation incidence performed during C-section in women with a history of 2 or more C-sections and the factors affecting sterilization demand. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who were admitted to Zekai Tahir Burak Woman's Health, Education and Research Hospital between February 2017 and June 2017 and who had a history of 2 or more C-sections between week 37 and 41 were included in this prospective cross-sectional study. These subjects were separated into 2 groups according to whether they wanted bilateral tubal ligation during C-section. Bilateral tubal ligation was performed by means of modified Pomeroy technique. Both groups were compared in terms of age, gravida, number of children living at home, education level and income status. Patients who did not want bilateral tubal ligation were asked to fill a questionnaire involving reasons for not asking for bilateral tubal ligation. RESULTS: The number of patients who wanted bilateral tubal ligation was 51 (43%) while those who did not want bilateral tubal ligation was 67 (57%). Compared with patients who did not want bilateral tubal ligation, patients who wanted bilateral tubal ligation had more number of children at home and a higher number of previous C-section (p<0.001). Reasons for not wanting bilateral tubal ligation consisted of religious beliefs (26.8%), desire for protection with a reversible contraceptive method (17.9%), partner who does not want bilateral tubal ligation (17.9%), incompletely family size (13.4%), respectively according to their frequency. CONCLUSION: Bilateral tubal ligation for contraception during C-section was performed forty-three percent of women who had had a history of 2 or more C-section. In one fourth of the cases, pregnant women did not want bilateral tubal ligation due to religious beliefs.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, H. K., UYGUR, D., TAŞCI, Y., DURMUŞ, M., KISA, B. K., ÜSTÜN, Y. E. (2018). Female Sterilization by Tubal Ligation During C-Section in Women with a History of 2 or More C-Sections. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 7–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/166070

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Patil E, Jensen JT. Permanent Contraception for Women. Semin Reprod Med. 2016
  2. 34(3):139-44 2. Adesiyun A. Female sterilisation by tubal ligation: A reappraisal of factors influencing decision making in a tropical setting. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007
  3. 275(4):241-4. 3. Aisien AO, Oronsaye AU. Two decades of minilaparotomy female sterilization at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital. Niger Postgrad Med J 2007
  4. 14(1):67-71. 4. Pati S, Cullins V. Female sterilization. Evidence. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2000
  5. 27(4):859-99. 5. Mutihir JT, Aisien AO, Ujah IA. A review of bilateral tubal ligation at caesarean section in Jos, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 2007
  6. 14(3):253-5. 6. Perkins RB, Morgan JR, Awosogba TP, Ramanadhan S, Paasche-Orlow MK. Gynecologic Outcomes After Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Sterilization Procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2016
  7. 128(4):843-52 7. Fernandez H, Legendre G, Blein C, Lamarsalle L, Panel P. Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014
  8. Wilcox LS, Chu SY, Eaker ED, Zeger SL, Peterson HB. Risk factors for regret after tubal sterilization: 5 years of follow up in a prospective study. Fertil Steril 1991
  9. 55 (5):927-33. 9. Grubb GS, Peterson HB, Layde PM, Rubin GL. Regret after decision to have a tubal sterilization. Fert Steril 1985
  10. 44(2):246-53. 10. S Dubey, SK Singh. Sociocultural analysis of the cases of reversal of female sterilization: A retrospective study. Health and Population Perspectives and issues.1992
  11. 15(1-2): 26-31 11. Mutihir JT, Aisien AO, Ujah IA. A review of bilateral tubal ligation at caesarean section in Jos, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 2007
  12. 14(3):252-5 12. Potter JE, Stevenson AJ, White K, Hopkins K, Grossman D. Hospital Variation in Postpartum Tubal Sterilization Rates in California and Texas. Obstet Gynecol. 2013
  13. 121(1): 152–8 13. Moreno JM, Bartual E, Carmona M, Araico F, Miranda JA, Herruzo AJ. Changes in the rate of tubal ligation done after cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001
  14. 97(2):147-51. 14. Gizzo S, Bertocco A, Saccardi C, Di Gangi S, Litta PS, D'antona D, et al. Female sterilization: update on clinical efficacy, side effects and contraindications. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2014
  15. 23(5):261-70 15. Moreno JM, Bartual E, Carmona M, Araico F, Miranda JA, Herruzo AJ. Changes in the rate of tubal ligation done after cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod B