Journals / Experimental Biomedical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of electrocardiographic ventricular and atrial repolarization markers in patients with high grade varicocele

Pages
44–49
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Long-term follow-up and large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Varicocele is abnormal dilation of testis veins without unclear pathophysiology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This is a prospective study which was conducted in a University Hospital between February and June 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Long-term follow-up and large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: Varicocele is abnormal dilation of testis veins without unclear pathophysiology. Morphological studies showed imbalance between vasoconstrictor and vasodilator mechanisms. We aimed to determine the relationship between varicocele and cardiovascular system disorders with electrocardiography (ECG) parameters. Methods: This is a prospective study which was conducted in a University Hospital between February and June 2018. Thirty patients (18-45 years old) with high grade varicocele from urology outpatient clinic and 32 healthy volunteers for the control group were recruited to the study. Results: P-min. value was significantly higher in control group than patients with high grade varicocele (p= 0.03). PR, QT and QTc intervals, PWD and P-max values were similar. Also, there were no significant differences in terms of the other ECG parameters between the groups. Conclusions: In this small prospective study we have found no association between high grade varicocele and potential electrocardiographic arrhythmia predictors namely OTd, QTc interval, PWD, Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio and Tp-e/QTc ratio. Long-term follow-up and large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDAL, E., SİNCER, İ., GUCUK, A., GÜNEŞ, B. Y., BOSTANCI, M. E. (2019). Evaluation of electrocardiographic ventricular and atrial repolarization markers in patients with high grade varicocele. Experimental Biomedical Research, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 44–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/165983

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Nöske HD, Weidner W. Varicocele--a historical perspective. World J Urol. 1999
  2. 17(3):151-57. [2]Akbay E, Cayan S, Doruk E, Duce MN, Bozlu M. The prevalence of varicocele and varicocele-related testicular atrophy in Turkish children and adolescents. BJU Int. 2000
  3. 86(4):490-93. [3]Kursh ED. What is the incidence of varicocele in a fertile population? Fertil Steril. 1987
  4. 48(3):510-11. [4]Hendry WF, Sommerville IF, Hall RR, Pugh RC. Investigation and treatment ofthe subfertile male. Br J Urol. 1973
  5. 45(6):684- 92. [5]Cockett AT, Takihara H, Cosentino MJ. The varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1984
  6. 41(1):5- 11. [6]Yildiz O, Gul H, Ozgok Y, Onguru O, Kilciler M, Aydin A, et al. AC. Increased vasoconstrictor reactivity and decreased endothelial function in high grade varicocele
  7. functional and morphological study. Urol Res. 2003
  8. 31(5):323-28. [7]Terquem A, Dadoune JP. Morphological findings in varicocele: an ultrastructural study of 30 bilateral testicular biopsies. Int J Androl. 1981
  9. 4(5):515-31. [8]Koyuncu H, Ergenoglu M, Yencilek F, Gulcan N, Tasdelen N, Yencilek E,et al. The evaluation of saphenofemoral insufficiency in primary adult varicocele. J Androl. 2011
  10. 32(2):151-54. [9]Ciaccio V, Ficola F, Ceccarelli F, Capodicasa E. Assessment of saphenofemoral junction continence in 42 patients with primary varicocele. Minerva Chir. 1995
  11. 50(5):469-73. [10]Karadeniz-Bilgili MY, Basar H, Simsir I, Unal B, Batislam E. Assessment of sapheno-femoral junction continence in patients with primary adolescent varicocoele. Pediatr Radiol. 2003
  12. 33(9):603-6. [11]Yetkin E, Kilic S, Acikgoz N, Ergin H, Aksoy Y, Sincer I,et al. Increased prevalence of varicocele in patients with coronary artery ectasia. Coron Artery Dis. 2005
  13. 16(5):261-64. [12]Kiliç S, Aksoy Y, Sincer I, Oğuz F, Erdil N, Yetkin E. Cardiovascular evaluation of young patients with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2007
  14. 88(2):369-73. [13]Zabel M, Klingenheben T, Franz MR, Hohnloser SH. Assessment of QT dispersion for prediction of mortality or arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: results of a prospective, longterm follow-up study. Circulation. 1998
  15. 97(25):2543-50. [14]Kors JA, Ritsema van Eck HJ, van Herpen G. The meaning of the Tp-Te interval and its diagnostic value. J Electrocardiol. 2008
  16. 41(6):575-80. [15]Perez MV, Dewey FE, Marcus R, Ashley EA, Al-Ahmad AA, Wang PJ,et al. Electrocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2009
  17. 158(4):622- 28. [16]Mihmanli I, Kurugoglu S, Cantasdemir M,