SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Mediating Role of Emotional Quotient in the Relationship between Life Satisfaction and Resilience

Yaşam Doyumu ve Yılmazlık Arasındaki İlişkide Duygusal Zekanın Aracı Rolü

Mehmet TAŞKIRMAZ
CANAN GAMZE BAL
Pages
1559–1576
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, the study provides considerably useful implications for the parties concerned.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study investigates the mediating role of emotional quotient in the relationship between life satisfaction and resilience.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As predicted from the previous studies, it was determined that life satisfaction was positively correlated with resilience in a statistically significant way.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, the study provides considerably useful implications for the parties concerned.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yaşam Doyum · Yılmazlık · Duygusal Zeka

Abstract

The study investigates the mediating role of emotional quotient in the relationship between life satisfaction and resilience. Many studies in the literature indicate that a person’s life satisfaction is correlated with resilience level. Also, many authors have reported that emotional quotient is positively associated with life satisfaction and resilience. Structural equation modeling has been designed to reveal the relationship between life satisfaction, resilience and emotional quotient. Study data were obtained from the students receiving education in Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. As predicted from the previous studies, it was determined that life satisfaction was positively correlated with resilience in a statistically significant way. Furthermore, it was revealed that emotional quotient mediated the relationship between life satisfaction and resilience. According to the results, the study provides considerably useful implications for the parties concerned.

Özet

Bu çalışma, yaşam doyumu ve yılmazlık arasındaki ilişkide duygusal zekanın aracı rolünü araştırmaktadır. Birçok çalışmada; kişinin yaşam doyumun[h1] [M2] un, yılmazlık seviyesiyle ilişkili olduğunu belirtmektedir. Ayrıca, çok sayıda yazar; duygusal zekanın, yaşam doyumu ve yılmazlıkla pozitif ilişkili olduğunu bildirmiştir. Yaşam doyumu, yılmazlık ve duygusal zeka arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya çıkarmak için yapısal eşitlik modellemesi tasarlandı. Araştırma verileri, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi öğrencilerinden elde edildi. Önceki çalışmalar doğrultusunda tahmin edildiği gibi yaşam doyumunun, yılmazlıkla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı pozitif ilişkili olduğu tespit edildi. Buna ilaveten, duygusal zekanın, yaşam doyumu ve yılmazlık arasındaki ilişkide aracı rolünün bulunduğu açığa çıkarıldı. Sonuçların sentezinde; bu çalışmanın, ilgili taraflar açısından oldukça faydalı çıkarımlar yansıttığı ifade edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIRMAZ, M., BAL, C. G. (2019). Mediating Role of Emotional Quotient in the Relationship between Life Satisfaction and Resilience. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 1559–1576. https://ajindex.com/articles/165951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenum. Armstrong, A. R., Galligan, R. F., & Critchley, C. R. (2011). Emotional intelligence and psychological resilience to negative life events. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 331–336.
  2. Baltacı, H. Ş., & Karataş, Z. (2015).
  3. Perceived Social Support, Depression and Life Satisfaction as the Predictor of the Resilience of Secondary School Students: The Case of Burdur. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 111–130.
  4. Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18, 13–25.
  5. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
  6. Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ago in the organization of behavior. In W. Collins (Ed.), Development of cognition, affect, and social relations (p.48). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Browne M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.) Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136–162.
  7. Burrus, J., Betancourt, A., Holtzman, S., Minsky J., MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. D. (2012). Emotional Intelligence Relates to Well-Being: Evidence from the Situational Judgment Test of Emotional Management. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 4(2), 151–166.
  8. Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Borgatta, E. F. (Eds.) Social measurement: Current issues. Beverly Hills: Sage. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
  9. Extremera, N. & Rey, L. (2016). Ability emotional intelligence and life satisfaction: Positive and negative affect as mediators. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 98–101.
  10. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. London: Bloomsbury. Hoznik, M. P. (1984). Life-span development. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 309–331.
  11. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1984). LISREL-VI user’s guide (3rd Ed.). Moorseville, IN: Scientific Software. Kadner, K. D. (1989). Resilience: Responding to adversity. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 27(7), 20–25.
  12. Karimi, L., Leggat, S. G., Donohue, L., Farrell, G., & Couper, G. E. (2014). Emotional rescu