Journals / Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

The response of the children with encopresis and the children with encopresis and urinary incontinence to constipation therapy: A prospective clinical study

Dışkı kaçıran çocuklar ile dışkı ve idrar kaçıran çocukların kabızlık tedavisine yanıtı: İleriye dönük klinik çalışma

Pages
74–79
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was interesting that 70 % of children had still encopresis and urinary incontinence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The children with encopresis and the children complaining of encopresis and urinary incontinence that was learned during history were compared for their response to constipation therapy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Fifty children, (5-15 years) were classified into two groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was interesting that 70 % of children had still encopresis and urinary incontinence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dışkı kaçırma · İdrar kaçırma · Çocuk

Abstract

Aim: The children with encopresis and the children complaining of encopresis and urinary incontinence that was learned during history were compared for their response to constipation therapy. Method: Fifty children, (5-15 years) were classified into two groups. Group 1 and Group 2 consisted of the children with encopresis and the children with encopresis and urinary incontinence, respectively. After ruling out all other causes except constipation, colonic transit time (CTT) and anorectal manometry (ARM) were studied before and after treatment. Single ingestion method was used for CTT. Mean resting and sequeze pressures of anal canal (RP,SP), threshold volume for the first sense of defecation (TV) and the sense of urge defecation were evaluated during ARM studies. 1 ml/kg/day lactulose was given for six months. Numbers of defecation and encopresis a week were noted before and after the treatment. The children who had still urinary incontinence after the treatment were investigated by advanced studies. Results: Before the treatment, there were no differences in terms of age, gender, general complaints, CTT and RMN values, the numbers of defecation and encopresis between the groups. After the treatment, CTT and number of encopresis decreased significantly in both groups, but defecation numbers did not change. In addition, there were also an increase in urge sensation and a decrease in TV in Group 1. Complete recovery of encopresis was 26 % and 30 % in Groups 1 and 2. Complete recovery of enuresis was 30 % in Group 2. Children with still urinary incontinence had mostly over active detrusor contractions. Conclusion: The response of both groups to constipation therapy was similar. It was interesting that 70 % of children had still encopresis and urinary incontinence.

Özet

Amaç: Sadece dışkı kaçıran (DK) çocuklar ile öykü alımı sırasında DK ile birlikte idrar kaçırması (İK) da olduğu öğrenilen çocukların kronik kabızlık tedavisine verdikleri yanıt karşılaştırılmıştır. Yöntem: Yaşları 5-15 yıl arasında değişen, toplam 50 çocuk (39 erkek, 11 kız) çalışmaya kabul edilerek iki gruba ayrıldı. Grup 1'de sadece DK, Grup 2'de DK ve İK olan çocuklar yer aldı. Kabızlık dışı diğer nedenler elenerek tedavi öncesinde ve sonrasında kalın barsak boşalma zamanı (KBBZ) ve anorektal manometri (ARM) çalışmaları yapıldı. KBBZ çalışmaları tek alım tekniğine göre hesaplandı. ARM sırasında anal kanal dinlenme (DB) ve sıkma (SB) basınçları, ilk dışkılama hissi oluşturan eşik hacim (EH), acil dışkılama hissi (ADH) ve rektoanal inhibitör refleks (RAİR) varlığı belirlendi. Altı ay süreyle 1 ml/kg/gün dozunda laktüloz tedavisi verildi. Tedavi öncesi ve sonrasında her iki grubun haftalık dışkılama ve DK sayıları, Grup 2'nin İK şekli not edildi. Tedavi sonrası İK devam edenlerin üriner sistemleri değerlendirilerek mesane fonksiyonları incelendi. Bulgular: Tedavi öncesinde gruplar arasında yaş, cinsiyet, genel yakınmalar, KBBZ ve ARM değerleri, haftalık dışkılama ve DK sayıları açısından fark yoktu. Tedavi sonrasında her iki grubun KBBZ değerleri ve DK sayılarında belirgin düşme görüldü, dışkılama sayılarında değişiklik yoktu. Grup 1'in ek olarak EH değerlerinde azalma, ADH oranlarında yükselme olduğu dikkat çekti, ancak gruplar arasında bir fark yoktu. Grup 1 ve 2'de sırasıyla % 26 ve 30 oranında DK, Grup 2'de % 30 oranında İK tamamen geçti. İK devam edenlerde en sık "over active detrusor"(OAD), aşırı kasılan detrusor saptandı. Sonuç: Her iki grubun kronik kabızlık tedavisine yanıtı birbirine benzer bulundu. Şiddetleri azalmakla beraber % 70 oranında DK ve İK'nın devam ettiği dikkat çekti.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİROĞULLARI, B., DEMİRBAĞ, S., DOĞAN, İ., DALGIÇ, B., GÜVEN, A., TÜRKYILMAZ, Z., SÖNMEZ, K., ÜNAL, S., BAŞAKLAR, A. C., KALE, N. (2005). The response of the children with encopresis and the children with encopresis and urinary incontinence to constipation therapy: A prospective clinical study. Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 74–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/165861

References (1)

  1. Abi-Hanna A, Lake AM: Constipation and encopresis in children. Pediatrics in Review 19:23, 1998 2.Arhan P, Devreode G, Jehannin B, et al: Segmental co­lonic transit time. Dis Colon Rectum 24:625, 1981. 3.Bailey JA, Powers JJ, Waylonic GW: A clinical evalu­ation of electromyography of the anal sphincter. Arch Phys Med Rehab 51:403, 1970 4.Bouchoucha M, Devroede G, Renard P, et al: Compartmental analysis of colonic transit reveals abnormalities in constipated patients with normal transit. Clin Sci (Colch) 89:129,1995 5.Buttross S: Encopresis in the child with a behavioral di­sorder: When the initial treatment does not work. Pediatric Annals 28:317, 1999 6.Corazziari E, Çucchiara S, Staiano A, et al: Gastrointes­tinal transit time, frequency of defecation, and anorectal manometry in healthy and constipated children. J Pediatr 106:379, 1985 7.Gutierrez C, Marco A, Nogales A, et al: Total and seg­mental colonic transit time and anorectal manometry in children with chronic idiopathic constipation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 35:31, 2002 8.Issenman RM, Filmer RB, Gorski PA: A review of bo­wel and bladder control development in children: How gastroinrestinal and urologic conditions relate to problems in toilet training. Pediatrics 103:1346, 1999 9.Koff SA, Wagner TT, Jayanthi VR: The relationship among dysfunctional elimination syndromes, primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infections in children. J Urol 160(3 Pt 2): 1019, 1998 10.Levine MD: Children with encopresis: A descriptive analysis. Pediatrics 56:412, 1975 11.Loening-Baucke V, Younoszai MK: Abnormal anal sphincter response in chronically constipated children. J Pediatr 100:213, 1982 12.Loening-Baucke V: Abnormal rectoanal function in children recovered from chronic constipation and encopre­sis. Gastroenterology 87:1299, 1984 13.Loening-Baucke V: Factors determining outcome in children with chronic constipation and faecal soiling. Gut 30:999, 1989 14.Loening-Baucke V: Modulation of abnormal defecati­on dynamics by biofeedback treatment in chronically cons­tipated children with encopresis. J Pediatr 116:214,1990 15.Loening-Baucke V: Encopresis and soiling. Pediatr Clin N Am 43:278, 1996 16.Loening-Baucke V: Clinical approach to fecal soiling in children. Clin Pediatr 39:603, 2000 17.Moffatt MEK: Nocturnal enuresis: A review of the ef­ficacy of treatment and practical advice for clinicians. JDBP 18,49, 1997 18.Nogard JP, van Gool JD, Hjalmas K, et al: Standardi­zation and definitions in lower u