SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL COMPARISON OF SPINOPELVIC FIXATION METHODS: S2-ALAR-ILIAC SCREW VERSUS CONVENTIONAL ILIAC SCREW IN LONG SEGMENT FUSION

Ali ARSLAN
Semih Kıvanç OLGUNER
İsmail İSTEMEN
Vedat AÇIK
Yurdal GEZERCAN
Pages
68–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, complications occurred in 32.1% (18/56) of patients: 24.1% (7/29) of patients in group 1 and 40.7% (11/27) of patients in group 2 (11/270), but no statistically significant difference was found.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to compare two different screw techniques used in spinopelvic instrumentation: the S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) method and the conventional iliac screw method, in terms of their radiographic parameters, health-related quality of life and associated complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 56 patients aged over 60 years, who underwent spinopelvic fixation using two different screw techniques, because of degenerative spinal diseases between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively enrolled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, complications occurred in 32.1% (18/56) of patients: 24.1% (7/29) of patients in group 1 and 40.7% (11/27) of patients in group 2 (11/270), but no statistically significant difference was found.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to compare two different screw techniques used in spinopelvic instrumentation: the S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) method and the conventional iliac screw method, in terms of their radiographic parameters, health-related quality of life and associated complications. Materials and Methods: A total of 56 patients aged over 60 years, who underwent spinopelvic fixation using two different screw techniques, because of degenerative spinal diseases between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. They were divided into two groups based on the type of screw technique used; twenty-nine patients underwent the S2AI screw method (group 1) while 27 patients underwent the iliac screw method (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters [sagittal vertical axis (SVA), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT) and lumbar lordosis (LL)] and the Oswestry Disability index (ODI) were measured and compared. Results: Generally, all the radiographic parameters (SVA, SS, PT, LL) demonstrated a significant postoperative improvement in the whole study group; however, there were no significant differences between group 1 and group 2 (p=0.696, p=0.218, p=0.245, p=0.117). Regarding the ODI, a significant improvement was observed in all the patients in the postoperative period compared with the preoperative period, although no significant differences were detected between group 1 and group 2 (p=0.522). Overall, complications occurred in 32.1% (18/56) of patients: 24.1% (7/29) of patients in group 1 and 40.7% (11/27) of patients in group 2 (11/270), but no statistically significant difference was found. Conclusion: This study revealed that the two screw methods being compared have yielded similar results in terms of radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes. Therefore, we recommend that surgical teams should use the screw technique they are most experienced and familiar with

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, A., OLGUNER, S. K., İSTEMEN, İ., AÇIK, V., GEZERCAN, Y. (2020). CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL COMPARISON OF SPINOPELVIC FIXATION METHODS: S2-ALAR-ILIAC SCREW VERSUS CONVENTIONAL ILIAC SCREW IN LONG SEGMENT FUSION. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 68–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/165265

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bridwell KH. Utilization of iliac screws and structural interbody grafting for revision spondylolisthesis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(6 Suppl):S88-96
  2. Cunningham BW, Sefter JC, Hu N, Kim SW, Bridwell KH, McAfee PC. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:E198-205
  3. Dalbayrak S, Yaman O, Ayten M, Yilmaz M, Ozer AF. Surgical treatment in sacral fratures and traumatic spinopelvic instabilities. Turk Neurosurg. 2013;24:498-505
  4. Koshimune K, Ito Y, Sugimoto Y, Kikuchi T, Morita T, Mizuno S, et al. Minimally Invasive Spinopelvic Fixation for Unstable Bilateral Sacral Fractures. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29:124-7
  5. Tang X, Yang R, Qu H, Cai Z, Guo W. Factors Associated With Spinopelvic Fixation Mechanical Failure After Total Sacrectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:1
  6. El Dafrawy MH, Raad M, Okafor L, Kebaish KM. Sacropelvic Fixation: A Comprehensive Review. Spine Deform. 2019;7:509-16
  7. Oba H, Ebata S, Takahashi J, Ikegami S, Koyama K, Haro H, et al. Loss of Pelvic Incidence Correction After Long Fusion Using Iliac Screws for Adult Spinal Deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44:195-202
  8. Shillingford JN, Laratta JL, Park PJ, Lombardi J, Tuchman A, Saifi C, et al. Human versus Robot. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:E1297-304
  9. Schoenleber SJ, Asghar J, Bastrom TP, Shufflebarger HL. Are S1 Screws a Useful Adjunct to Iliac Screws in Long Fusions to the Sacrum in Cerebral Palsy? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41:139-45
  10. Fu K-MG, Smith JS, Burton DC, Shaffrey C, Boachie-Adjei O, Carlson B, et al. Outcomes and Complications of Extension of Previous Long Fusion to the Sacro-Pelvis: Is an Anterior Approach Necessary? World Neurosurg. 2013;79:177-81
  11. Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, Smith JA, Hu SS, Bradford DS. Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:776-86
  12. Jain A, Hassanzadeh H, Sa S, En M, Pd S, Km K. Pelvic Fixation in Adult and Pediatric Spine Surgery: Historical Perspective, Indications, and Techniques. J Bone Jt Surg [Am]. 2015;97:1521-8
  13. Burns CB, Dua K, Trasolini NA, Komatsu DE, Barsi JM. Biomechanical Comparison of Spinopelvic Fixation Constructs: Iliac Screw Versus S2- Alar-Iliac Screw. Spine Deform. 2016;4:10-5
  14. Yakut E, Düger T, Oksüz C, Yorukan S,