Journals / EX-LIBRIST - Uluslararası Ekslibris Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Symbolic Representation And Exlibris Reading As Narration

Pages
34–42
Publication Date
2016-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Here, exlibris is interpreted as storyline and symbolic expression.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Exlibris is centuries old representation form although nowadays it’s contemporary, distinctive art field and means of communication.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Representation isn’t the thing that it represents but its instrument.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Here, exlibris is interpreted as storyline and symbolic expression.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ekslibris · symbol · representation

Abstract

Exlibris is centuries old representation form although nowadays it’s contemporary, distinctive art field and means of communication. Representation isn’t the thing that it represents but its instrument. Its intermediary feature makes it symbolic. In exlibris, representation is established on person or institute, not only on artist’s work. It makes the era of artist and societies’ features readable. Exlibris covers subjective symbols that forming localized style of artist, provides availability for narration to universal structure of art by symbols. Here, exlibris is interpreted as storyline and symbolic expression.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alp, K. Ö. (2016). Symbolic Representation And Exlibris Reading As Narration. EX-LIBRIST - Uluslararası Ekslibris Dergisi, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 34–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/1650257

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alp, K. Ö. (2009). Kültürel Sembollere Giriş. Ankara: Eflatun Yayınevi.
  2. Alp, K. Ö. (2010). A Comparison of Sign and Symbol (Their Contents and Boundaries). Semiotica, 182 (1/4), 1-13.
  3. Arat, N. (1977). Ernst Cassirer ve S. K. Langer’de Sembolik Form Olarak Sanat. İstanbul:
  4. Cohen, A. P. (1999). Topluluğun Simgesel Kuruluşu. (M.Küçük, Çev.). Ankara: Dost Yayınları.
  5. Demir, H. (2008). Tutkuyla Yaşatılmaya Çalışılan Sanat Alanı Ekslibris. Atatürk
  6. Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 53-57. Durand, G. (1998). Sembolik İmgelem. (A. Meral, Çev.). İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları.
  7. Morris, B. (2004). Din Üzerine Antropolojik İncelemeler. (T. Atay, Çev.). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
  8. Onega, S., Angel, J., Landa, G. (2002). Anlatıbilime Giriş. (Y. Salman, D. Hakyemez, Çev.). İstanbul: Adam Yayınları.
  9. Pektaş, H. (2003). Exlibris. Ankara: AED Yayınları,
  10. Pektaş, H. (2014). Türkiye’de Ekslibris. Journal Academic Marketing Mysticism Online (JAMMO), 8, 28.
  11. Rıfat, M. (2009). Göstergebilimin ABC’si. İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
  12. Strauss, C. L. (2013). Mit ve Anlam. (G.Y. Demir, Çev.). İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları.
  13. Yaban, N. T. (2012). Sanat ve Görsel İletişimin Buluşma Noktası Ekslibris. Batman
  14. University Journal of Life Sciences,1(1). Elektronic References Pektaş, H. Ekslibris Nedir? Erişim: 02. 09. 2014, http://www.aed.org.tr. http://akademiartisikgsf.blogspot.com.tr/2010/02/ekslibris-kongresi-prof-hasip. html
  15. Electronic References Pektaş, H. Ekslibris Nedir? Erişim: 02. 09. 2014, http://www.aed.org.tr. http://akademiartisikgsf.blogspot.com.tr/2010/02/ekslibris-kongresi-prof-hasip. html