Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2018 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.4% and Nepafenac 0.1% for the Prevention of Cystoid Macular Oedema After Phacoemulsifi cation: Prospective Placebo-Controlled Study

Fakoemülsifi kasyon Cerrahisi Sonrası Kistoid Makula Ödemi Oluşumunun Engellenmesi için %0.4 Ketorolak trometamin ve %0.1 Nepafenak Kullanımın Karşılaştırılması: Prospektif Plasebo-Kontrollü Çalışma

Pages
27–31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Used prophylactically after uneventful cataract surgery, non-steroidal anti-infl ammatory drugs were found effective in preventing macular oedema.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare the anti-infl ammatory effi cacy of ketorolac-tromethamine 0.4% and nepafenac 0.1% eye drops for prophylaxis of cystoid macular oedema (CME) following uncomplicated cataract extraction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group 1 patients received ketorolac-tromethamine 0.4% (Acular LS, Allergan); group 2 received nepafenac 0.1% (Nevanac, Alcon) and group 3 received topical arti- fi cial tear substitute ( placebo)(Start on operation day, continue 4 weeks q.i.d.) The incidence and severity of CME were evaluated by central macular thickness (CMT) and total macular volume (TMV) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) post-operative 1 week and 4 weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Used prophylactically after uneventful cataract surgery, non-steroidal anti-infl ammatory drugs were found effective in preventing macular oedema.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the anti-infl ammatory effi cacy of ketorolac-tromethamine 0.4% and nepafenac 0.1% eye drops for prophylaxis of cystoid macular oedema (CME) following uncomplicated cataract extraction. Materials and Methods: Patients were assigned randomly to three groups in this prospective, placebo-controlled, randomised study. Group 1 patients received ketorolac-tromethamine 0.4% (Acular LS, Allergan); group 2 received nepafenac 0.1% (Nevanac, Alcon) and group 3 received topical arti- fi cial tear substitute ( placebo)(Start on operation day, continue 4 weeks q.i.d.) The incidence and severity of CME were evaluated by central macular thickness (CMT) and total macular volume (TMV) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) post-operative 1 week and 4 weeks. Results: Ninety-six eyes of 96 patients were included in this study. The differences between groups in CMT and total macular volume on time pre-o- perative, post-operative 1 week and post-operative 4 weeks were not statistically signifi cant. The differences in CMT and TMV between 4 week and baseline were not statistically signifi cant in NSAI group. In control group, CMT and TMV were signifi cant higher at 4 weeks (p=0.04, p=0.024, res- pectively). Conclusion: Used prophylactically after uneventful cataract surgery, non-steroidal anti-infl ammatory drugs were found effective in preventing macular oedema.

Özet

Amaç: Katarakt cerrahisi sonrası kistoid makula ödemi (KMÖ) profi laksisinde kullanılan anti-infl amatuar %0.4 ketorolak trometamin ve %0.1 nepa- fenak göz damlalarının etkinliğini karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Prospektif, randomize, plasebo kontrollü çalışmamızda, hastalar 3 grupta incelendi. Birinci gruba % 0.4 ketorolak trometamin (Acular LS, Allergan), ikinci gruba % 0.1 nepafenak (Nevanac, Alcon) ve üçüncü gruba suni gözyaşı damlası (plasebo), cerrahi günü başlayarak 4 hafta boyunca günde 4 defa bir damla şeklinde verildi. Postoperatif 1. hafta ve postoperatif 4. haftada optik koherens tomografi ile santral makula kalınlığı (SMK) ve total maküler volüm (TMV) ölçülerek KMÖ sıklığı ve şiddeti değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 96 hastanın 96 gözü dahil edildi. Gruplar arasında ameliyat öncesi, ameliyat sonrası 1. hafta ve ameliyat sonrası 4.hafta ortalama SMK ve TMV değerleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı. NSAI kullanan hastalarda 4. haftada ölçülen SMK ve TMV ile ame- liyat öncesi ölçülen SMK ve TMV arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmadı. Kontrol grubunda, 4. haftada SMK ve TMV anlamlı yüksek saptandı (sırasıyla p=0.04, p=0.024). Sonuç: Komplikasyonsuz katarakt cerrahi sonrası, KMÖ profi laksisinde kullanılan topikal non-steroid anti-infl amatuar damlaların etkinliği gözlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, M., ÖZCAN, S., VALİYEV, İ., POLAT, O. (2018). Comparison of Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.4% and Nepafenac 0.1% for the Prevention of Cystoid Macular Oedema After Phacoemulsifi cation: Prospective Placebo-Controlled Study. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 27–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/164990

References (13)

  1. Nelson ML, Martidis A. Managing cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003; 14: 39-43. Kosaka T. The effects of prostaglandins on the blood-retinal bar- rier. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1995; 99: 412-9.
  2. Tetikoglu M, Un Y, Tunc Y, et al. Fakoemülsifi kasyon cerrahisi sonrası maküla kalınlığının optik kohorens tomografi ile değerlen- dirilmesi. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2014; 44: 88-91. Flach AJ. The incidence, pathogenesis and treatment of cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1998; 96: 557-634.
  3. Kusbeci T, Eryigit L, Yavas G, et al. Evaluation of cystoid macular edema using optical coherence tomography and fundus fl uoresce- in angiography after uncomplicated phacoemulsifi cation surgery. Curr Eye Res. 2012; 37: 327-33.
  4. Kessel L, Tendal B, Jørgensen KJ, et al. Post-cataract prevention o infl ammation and macular edema by steroid and nonsteroidal an- ti-infl ammatory eye drops: a systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121: 1915-24.
  5. Roberts CW, Brennan KM. A comparison of topical diclofenac with prednisone for postcataract infl ammation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113: 725-7.
  6. Flach AJ, Dolan BJ, Donahue ME, et al. Comparative effects of ke- torolac 0.5% or diclofenac 0.1% ophthalmic solutions on infl am- mation after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105: 1775-9.
  7. Mathys KC, Cohen KL. Impact of nepafenac 0.1% on macularthickness and postoperative visual acuity after cataract surgery in patients at low risk for cystoid macular oedema. Eye (Lond). 2010; 24: 90-6.
  8. Almeida DR, Khan Z, Xing L, et al. Prophylactic nepafenac and ketorolac versus placebo in preventing postoperative macular ede- ma after uneventful phacoemulsifi cation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38: 1537-43.
  9. Kim A, Stark WJ. Are topical NSAIDs needed for routine cataract surgery? Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 146: 483-5.
  10. Rossetti L, Bujtar E, Castoldi D, et al. Effectiveness of diclofenac eyedrops in reducing infl ammation and the incidence of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22: 794-9.
  11. Semiz F, Ucgun Nİ, Abbasoğlu OE, et al. Evaluation of intraope- rative and postoperative and postoperative complicationsın phaco- emulsifi cation. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol. 2003; 12: 151-6.
  12. Miyake K, Ibaraki N. Prostaglandins and cystoid macular edema. Survey Ophthalmol. 2002; 47: 203-18.
  13. Puliafi to CA, Hee MR, Lin CP, et al. Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 1995;