SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2003 / Sayı: 0

Türkçe'de Durum Değişikliği Eylemlerinin Kılınış Özellikleri

Yeşim AKSAN
Pages
1–14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper also illustrates the effects of linguistic materials (degree modifiers, measure phrases) and contextual interpretations on the (a)telicity of these deadjectival degree achievements .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper analyzes aspectual characteristics of change of state verbs, specifically "degree achievements," based on gradable adjectives in Turkish.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Adopting the approach developed by Hay, Kennedy and Levin (1999), the reason of this ambivalence is searched in the gradable nature of the base adjectives which define a scale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper also illustrates the effects of linguistic materials (degree modifiers, measure phrases) and contextual interpretations on the (a)telicity of these deadjectival degree achievements .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper analyzes aspectual characteristics of change of state verbs, specifically "degree achievements," based on gradable adjectives in Turkish. In terms of temporal properties, these verbs display variable behaviour: they can refer to either telle or atelic situations. Adopting the approach developed by Hay, Kennedy and Levin (1999), the reason of this ambivalence is searched in the gradable nature of the base adjectives which define a scale. It is the (non)boundedness of this scale that determines (a)telicity of the situations which is maintained by the deadjectival degree achievements. This paper also illustrates the effects of linguistic materials (degree modifiers, measure phrases) and contextual interpretations on the (a)telicity of these deadjectival degree achievements .

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSAN, Y. (2003). Türkçe'de Durum Değişikliği Eylemlerinin Kılınış Özellikleri. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 0, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/164970

References (8)

  1. Abusch, D. (1986).
  2. Verbs of Charge, Causation, and Time. Report 86-50. Stanford: CSLI. Bertinetto, P.M., Squartini, M. (1995). An attempt at defining the class of 'gradual completion verbs'. P.M. Bertinetto ve dig. (haz.) içinde, Temporal Reference Aspect and Actionality, I: Semantic and Syntactic Perspectives, 11-26. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier. Cruse, D.A. ( 1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP. Declerck, R. (1979). Aspect and the bounded/unbounded (telic/atelic) distinction. Linguistics, 17, 761-794.
  3. Dowty, D. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Hay, J., Kennedy, C. ve Levin. B. (1999). Scalar structure underlies telicity in "degree achievements". Proceedings of SALTIX, 127-144.
  4. Jackendoff, R. (1996). The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps event quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, 305-354.
  5. Kenny, A. (1963).
  6. Actions, Emotions, and Will. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Kennedy, C. (1999). Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. New York: Garland. Kennedy. C., McNaIIy, L. (1999). From event structure to scale structure: Degree modification in déverbal adjectives. Proceedings of SALT IX, 163-180.
  7. Kenney, C., Beth. L. (2000). Telicity corresponds to degree of change. Michigan State University, izlek. www.ling.nwu.edu/~kennedy/. Kennedy, C., McNaIIy, L. (2002). Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradabale predicates. Language dergisinde yayınlanacak, www. ling.nwu.edu/~kennedy/. Klein, E. (1991). Comparatives. A von Stechow ve D. Wunderlich (haz.) içinde, Semantik. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Klein, E. (1997). Adverbs of Degree in Dutch. Groningen: Rijkuniversiteit Groningen. Krifka, M. (1998). The origins of telicity. S. Rothstein (haz.) içinde, Events and Grammar. 197-236. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Lasersohn, P. (1995). Pragmatic halos. Language, 75, 522-551.
  8. Nakipoğlu, M. (2000). On the aspectual properties of unaccusatives. A. Göksel ve C. Kerslake (haz.) içinde, Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages, 67-74. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Olsen, M. (1997). A Semantic and Pragmatic Model of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. New York: Garland. Ramchand, G. C. (1997). Aspect and Predication. Oxford: Clarendon. Seuer, P. (1978). The structure and selection of positive and negative gradable adjectives. Papers from the Parasession on Lexicon. 336-346. Chicago: Chicago University. Tenny, C. (1994). Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantic