Journals / KBB-Forum / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

STANDARDIZATION OF CERVICAL VESTIBULAR EVOKED MYOGENIC POTENTIAL TESTS WITH AIR AND BONE CONDUCTION STIMULATION IN HEALTHY ADULTS

Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
47–59
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Determination of these values would be able to enable to form our standards to establish differential diagnosis of various diseases in the future.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to obtain normative data on Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (cVEMP) test inadult age group to use as a differential diagnostic test in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 50 volunteers who were completely healthy, had no history of vestibular disorder and hearing loss, and had normal otoscopic and audiologic examination results at the Department of Ear-Nose-Throat.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Determination of these values would be able to enable to form our standards to establish differential diagnosis of various diseases in the future.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to obtain normative data on Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (cVEMP) test inadult age group to use as a differential diagnostic test in our clinic. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 50 volunteers who were completely healthy, had no history of vestibular disorder and hearing loss, and had normal otoscopic and audiologic examination results at the Department of Ear-Nose-Throat. The p13 and n23 latency, p13-n23 interpeak latency and p13-n23 amplitude values of both ears of the subjects in the study were analyzed. Results: In the examination of mean values of cVEMP with air and bone conduction sound stimulation according to the genders, there was a statistically significant difference in the comparison of air conduction p13 latency, n23 latency and p13-n23 amplitude and bone conduction p13 latency (p <0.05). The air and bone conduction cVEMP test according to age groups was evaluated; a statistically significant difference was calculated according to the age groups in p13-n23 interpeak latency air conduction measurement and p13 and n23 latency bone conduction measurement values (p <0.05). Conclusion: In addition to the determination of normative values of our clinic in this study, we hope to make a contribution to the studies conducted on this matter in the literature through the results of the present study. Additionally, limit values of cVEMP test parameters assessed in the present study were also calculated. Determination of these values would be able to enable to form our standards to establish differential diagnosis of various diseases in the future.

🔖

Cite This Article

BORA, A., DURMUŞ, K., ALTUNTAŞ, E. E. (2020). STANDARDIZATION OF CERVICAL VESTIBULAR EVOKED MYOGENIC POTENTIAL TESTS WITH AIR AND BONE CONDUCTION STIMULATION IN HEALTHY ADULTS. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 47–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/164710

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Welgampola MS, Colebatch JG. Charasteristics and clinical applications of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Neurology 2005; 64: 1682-1688. 2.Ardıç FN. Vertigo. Özdek A. Öyküye dayalı ayırıcı tanıyaklaşımı. İzmir. US Akademi. 2019: (7); 69-75. 3.Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM, Skuse NF. Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57:190-197. 4.Wang CT, Young YH. Earlier And Later Components Of Tone-Burst Evoked Myogenic Potentials. Hear Res 2004;191(1-2):59-66. 5.Rosengren SM, Welgampola MS, Colebatch JG. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: Past, present and future. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121(5):636-51. 6.Derinsu U,Baş Eİ, Akdaş F. Vestibüler uyarılmış miyojenik potansiyellerin standardizasyonu. Marmara Medical Journal 2009;22(2);127-133. 7.Fu XX, Liu B, Qi BE, Ji C, Guan JZ. [Characteristics of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential in different test positions]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016; 51(9): 650-654.(Abstract) 8.Meyer N, Vinck B, Heinze B. cVEMPs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. IntJ Audiol. 2015; 54(3): 143-51. 9.Colebatch JG. Mapping the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP). J Vestib Res. 2012; 22(1): 27-32. 10.Sheykholeslami K, Murofushi T, Kaga K. The effect of sternocleidomastoid electrode location on vestibular evoked myogenic potential. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2001; 28(1): 41-3. 11.Papathanasiou ES, Murofushi T, Akin FW, Colebatch JG. International guidelines for the clinical application of cervical vestibular Evoked myogenic potentials: An expert consensus report. Clinical Neurophysiology Journal. 2014; 125(4): 658-666. 12.Wang, S.J, Young, YH. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials using simultaneous binaural acoustic stimulation. Hearing Research. 2003; 185(1): 43-48. 13.Janky KL, Shepard N. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing: Normative threshold response curves and effects of age. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 2009; 20(8): 514. 14.Maes L, Vinck BM, De Vel E, D’haenens W, Bockstael A, Keppler H, Swinnen F, Dhooge I. The vestibular evoked myogenic potential: A test-retest reliability study. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2009; 120(3): 594-600. 15.Cal R, Bahmad F. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: An overview. Brazilian Journal Otorhinolaryngology. 2009; 75(3): 456-62. 16.Driscoll C, Bekessy A, Bui V, Fox D, Harvey M, Mackenzie D. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: Clinical implications of a normati