Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Brucella canis and Public Health Risk

Pages
52–56
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No antibiotic treatment is reported to be 100% effective in B. canis infections, and infected animals are recommended to be removed from other animals and not be used for reproduction for a prolonged period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pregnancy losses in dogs are associated with many types of bacteria.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Dogs can be infected by 4 out of 6 Brucella species (B. canis, B. abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No antibiotic treatment is reported to be 100% effective in B. canis infections, and infected animals are recommended to be removed from other animals and not be used for reproduction for a prolonged period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Pregnancy losses in dogs are associated with many types of bacteria. Brucella canis is reported to be one of the most important bacterial species causing pregnancy loss in dogs. Dogs can be infected by 4 out of 6 Brucella species (B. canis, B. abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis). B. canis is a Gram-negative coccobacillus first isolated by Leland Carmichael and is a cause of infertility in both genders. It causes late abortions in female dogs and epididymitis in male dogs. Generalized lymphadenitis, discospondylitis, and uveitis are shown as the other major symptoms. B. canis infections can easily be formed as a result of the contamination of the oronasal, conjunctival, or vaginal mucosa . Infection can affect all dog breeds and people. While morbidity may be high in infection, mortality has been reported to be low. Most dogs are asymptomatic during infection, and it is difficult to convince their owners that their dogs are sick and should not be used in reproduction. The diagnosis of the disease is quite complex. Serological tests may provide false results or negative results in chronic cases. Therefore, diagnosis should be defined by combining the results of serological studies and bacterial studies to provide the most accurate result. No antibiotic treatment is reported to be 100% effective in B. canis infections, and infected animals are recommended to be removed from other animals and not be used for reproduction for a prolonged period.

🔖

Cite This Article

DARBAZ, İ., ERGENE, O. (2019). Brucella canis and Public Health Risk. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 52–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/164627

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Pretzer SD. Bacterial and protozoal causes of pregnancy loss in the bitch and queen. Theriogenology 2008; 70: 320-6. [CrossRef] 2. Hollett RB. Canine brucellosis: outbreaks and compliance. Theriogenology 2006; 66: 575-87. [CrossRef] 3. Carmichael LE. Abortion in 200 Beagles. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1966; 149: 1126. 4. Wanke MM. Canine brucellosis. Animal Reproduction Science 2004; 82-83: 195-207. [CrossRef] 5. Feldman Nelson. Sección 7. Reproduccıon En La Hembra Canına. Endocrınologıa Y Reproduccıon Canına Y Felına. 2007 6. Carmichael LE, Green EG. Canine brucellosis. In: Greene CE editor. Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat. WB Saunders Co: Philadelphia; 1990. pp. 573. 7. Carmichael LE, Joubert JC. Transmission of Brucella canis by contact exposure. Cornell Vet 1988; 78: 63-73. 8. Greene CE and George LW. Canine brucellosis. In Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat (ed. C. E. Greene), W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1984; pp. 646-51. 9. Zoha SJ, Walsh R. Effect of a two-stage antibiotic treatment regimen on dogs naturally infected with Brucella canis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1982; 180: 1474-5. 10. Weber A, Christoph H. Untersuchungen zur naturlichen Ubertragung von Brucella canis bei Hunden. Fortschr Veterinarmed 1982; 35: 351-5. 11. Johnson CA, Walker RD. Clinical signs and diagnosis of Brucella canis infection. Compend Cont Educ Pract Vet 1992; 14: 770-2. 12. Meyer ME. The genus Brucella In: Shaw MP, Stulp H, Truper HG, Balous A, and Schlegel HG, editors. The prokaryotes. Springer-Verlag: New York; 1981. pp. 1063-74. [CrossRef] 13. Serikawa T, Muraguchi T, Nakao N, Irie Y. Significance of urine culture for detecting infection with Brucella canis in dogs. Jpn J Vet Sci 1978; 40: 353. [CrossRef] 14. Myer ME. Brucella organisms isolated from dogs: comparison of characteristics of members of the genus brucella. Am J Vet Res 1969; 30: 1751. 15. Ergene O, Celebi B, Kucukaslan I. Seroprevalance of Canine Brucellosis and Toxoplasmosis in Female and Male Dogs and Relationship to Various Factors as Parity, Abortion and Pyometra. Indian J Anim Res 2017; 1-5. [CrossRef] 16. Moore JA, Bennett M. A previously undescribed organism associated with canine abortion. Vet Rec 1967; 80: 604-5. [CrossRef] 17. George LW, Duncan JR, Carmichael LE. Semen examination in dogs with canine brucellosis. Am J Vet Res 1979; 40: 1589-95. 18. Schoeb TR, Morton R. Scrotal and testicular changes in canine brucellosis: a case report. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1978; 172: 598-6