Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Using Quick Test, California Mastitis Test, and Somatic Cell Count for Diagnosis of Subclinical Mastitis Related with Human Health Risk

Pages
154–158
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION Quick Test is a supporting method to other tests or alternative method to CMT in the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis related with human health risk.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND/AIMS The aim of the present study was to compare Quick Test (QT) in the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis related with human health risk with California Mastitis Test (CMT) and to determine the compatibility of QT with Somatic Cell Count (SCC) using reference data from Fossomatic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS The study was performed using milk samples collected from 160 individual udder quarters of 40 Holstein cows at three different farms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION Quick Test is a supporting method to other tests or alternative method to CMT in the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis related with human health risk.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND/AIMS The aim of the present study was to compare Quick Test (QT) in the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis related with human health risk with California Mastitis Test (CMT) and to determine the compatibility of QT with Somatic Cell Count (SCC) using reference data from Fossomatic. MATERIAL and METHODS The study was performed using milk samples collected from 160 individual udder quarters of 40 Holstein cows at three different farms. Milk samples were initially checked by CMT and QT. Then, the samples were sent for SCC analyses. RESULTS The SCC results (0-100,000 cell/mL) of 101 (101/160) samples belonging to ≤100 standards of QT category were found to be compatible in the ratio of 60.39%. When QT standards of ≤100 and 250 were compared with the SCC results, the negative subclinical mastitis values (0-250,000 cell/mL) were compatible in the ratio of 84%. When CMT was compared with SCC, the negative subclinical mastitis values of CMT were found to be compatible with the SCC results (0-250,000 cell/mL) in the ratio of 85.9%. For the determination of all cases with subclinical mastitis, SCC data were found to be compatible with QT and CMT in the ratios of 97.6% and 63.4%, respectively. When QT and SCC were compared with each other, the specificity, sensitivity, and false ratio of QT were detected as 84.0%, 97.5%, and 16.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION Quick Test is a supporting method to other tests or alternative method to CMT in the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis related with human health risk.

🔖

Cite This Article

DARBAZ, İ., ERGENE, O. (2018). Using Quick Test, California Mastitis Test, and Somatic Cell Count for Diagnosis of Subclinical Mastitis Related with Human Health Risk. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 154–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/157614

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Kehrli ME, Shuster DE. Factors affecting milk somatic cells and their role in health of the bovine mammary gland. J Dairy Sci 1994; 77: 619-27. [CrossRef] 2. Heeschen WH. Somatic cells as indicator of milk hygiene, scientific basis and the EU approach. Proc. 44th NMC Annual Meeting; 2005,
  2. Orlando, FL, pp. 52-72. 3. Oliver SP, Jayarao BM, Almeida RA. Foodborne pathogens, mastitis, milk quality, and dairy food safety. 44th NMC Annual Meeting. 2005 Jan 16-19;
  3. Orlando, USA. P. 3- 27. 4. Kossabiati MA, Esslemont RJ. The costs of producrion diseases in dairy herds in England. Vet J 1997; 154: 41-51. [CrossRef] 5. Bennett RM, Christjansen K, Clifton-Hadley RS. Estimating the costs associated with endemic diseases of dairy cattle. J Dairy Res 1999; 66: 455-9. [CrossRef] 6. Fourichon C, Beudeau F, Bareille N, Seegers H. Incidence of health disorders in dairy farming systems in western France. Livestock Prod Sci 2001; 68: 157-70. [CrossRef] 7. Harmon RJ. Physiology of Mastitis and Factors Affecting Somatic Cell Counts. J Dairy Sci 1994; 77: 2103-12. [CrossRef] 8. Barkema HW, Green MJ, Bradley AJ, Zadoks RN. Invited review: the role of contagious disease in udder health. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 4717-29. [CrossRef] 9. Olde Riekerink RGM, Barkema HW, Scholl DT, Poole DE, Kelton DF. Management practices associated with the bulk-milk prevalance of Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian dairy farms. Prev Vet Med 2010; 97: 20-28. [CrossRef] 10. Ruegg PL, Reinemann DJ. Milk quality and mastitis tests, 2002. Available from: URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237526620_Milk_Quality_and_Mastitis_Tests 11. Reksen O, Sølverød L, Østerås O. Relationship between milk culture results and milk yield in Norwegian dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 4670-8. [CrossRef] 12. Trindad P, Nickerson SC, Alley TK. Prevalence of intramammary infection and teat canal colonisation in unbred and primigravid dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci1990; 73: 107-14. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds. S0022-0302(90)78652-3 [CrossRef] 13. Oliver SP, Lewis MJ, Gillespie BE, Dowlen HH. Influence of prepartum antibiotic therapy on intramammary infections in primigravid heifers during early lactation. J Dairy Sci 1992; 75: 406-14. [CrossRef] 14. De Viegher S, Barkema HW, Stryhn H, Opsomer G, De Kruif A. Impact of early lactation somatic cell count in heifers on milk yield over the first lactation. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88: 938-47. [CrossRef] 15. Hillerton JE. Mastitis therapy is necessary for animal welfare. Bulletin of