Journals / GSU Managerial and Social Sciences Letters / 2026 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

IN THE SHADOW OF A FRACTURED STATE: THE SUCCESS OF HAYAT TAHRIR AL-SHAM IN SYRIA AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF NON-STATE ARMED ACTORS IN THE MIDDLE EAST

Parçalanmış Devletin Gölgesinde: Heyet Tahrir El Şam’ın Suriye’deki Başarısı ve Ortadoğu’daki Devlet Dışı Silahlı Aktörlerin Dönüşümü

Mehmet Berkay Durdu(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSAT FAKÜLTESİ, SİYASET BİLİMİ VE ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER BÖLÜMÜ, SİYASET BİLİMİ ANABİLİM DALI)0009-0002-1055-2266
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study aims to contribute to the literature by presenting a synthesis of the realist and constructivist approaches to the formation of the NSAA in the Middle East and explaining how HTS has transformed into a dominant actor within the context of the competitive support-seeking strategy and the ARI model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After the Second World War, non-state armed actors (NSAs), which have rapidly increased and started to threaten the national security of states, have increased their weight in the international arena in parallel with the increasingly unbearable costs of direct wars between nation-states.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Having become a global threat after the 2000s, NSAs have become an integral part of international relations and international security disciplines.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study aims to contribute to the literature by presenting a synthesis of the realist and constructivist approaches to the formation of the NSAA in the Middle East and explaining how HTS has transformed into a dominant actor within the context of the competitive support-seeking strategy and the ARI model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Devlet Dışı Silahlı Aktörler · Heyet Tahrir el-Şam · Suriye İç Savaşı

Abstract

After the Second World War, non-state armed actors (NSAs), which have rapidly increased and started to threaten the national security of states, have increased their weight in the international arena in parallel with the increasingly unbearable costs of direct wars between nation-states. Having become a global threat after the 2000s, NSAs have become an integral part of international relations and international security disciplines. The end of the Syrian civil war in 2024, which radically changed the place of NSAAs in the international relations literature and their role in global and regional power struggles, indicates a major transformation not only on a national scale but also on a global scale. This study, which analyzes the formation of NSAAs in the Middle East and the success of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) in Syria, seeks answers to the questions of what factors paved the way for the foundation of NSAAs and how HTS, as an NSAA, was able to transform into a dominant actor, end a 13-year civil war and establish a new regime. Within this framework, the study, designed as a state-level analytical case study, analyzes the emergence of NSAAs in the Middle East as a synthesis of realist and constructionist theory. Three independent variables are proposed for the emergence of the NSAA: ungovernable spaces, failed state, and social polarization. Regarding how HTS positively differentiated and seized power in Syria, where more than 250 NSAAs are active, the study proposes that the effective application of the competitive support-seeking strategy and the ARI model developed by Aydınlı. This study aims to contribute to the literature by presenting a synthesis of the realist and constructivist approaches to the formation of the NSAA in the Middle East and explaining how HTS has transformed into a dominant actor within the context of the competitive support-seeking strategy and the ARI model.

Özet

İkinci Dünya Savaşı’nın ardından hızla artan ve devletlerin ulusal güvenliklerini tehdit etmeye başlayan devlet dışı silahlı aktörler (DDSA), devletlerin birbirleriyle doğrudan savaşa girmesinin maliyetlerinin giderek daha da katlanılmaz bir boyuta evrilmesine paralel bir şekilde uluslararası arenadaki ağırlığını artırmıştır. Bilhassa 2000’li yıllardan sonra küresel bir tehdit haline gelen DDSAlar, bugün uluslararası ilişkiler ve uluslararası güvenlik disiplinlerinin ayrılmaz bir parçası haline gelmiştir. DDSAların uluslararası ilişkiler literatüründeki yerini, küresel ve bölgesel güç mücadeleleri bağlamındaki rollerini radikal bir biçimde değiştiren Suriye iç savaşının, 2024 yılında sona ermesi, yalnızca ulusal ölçekte değil, küresel ölçekte de büyük bir kırılmaya işaret etmektedir. Ortadoğu’da DDSA oluşumunu ve Suriye’de Heyet Tahrir el-Şam (HTŞ)’ın neden başarılı olduğunu inceleyen bu çalışma; DDSAların oluşumuna zemin hazırlayan faktörlerin neler olduğu ve bir DDSA olarak HTŞ’nin nasıl baskın bir aktöre dönüşerek 13 yıl boyunca süren iç savaşı bitirerek yeni bir rejim kurabildiği sorularına cevap aramaktadır. Bu çerçevede, devlet düzeyli, analitik bir vaka incelemesi olarak tasarlanan çalışma, Ortadoğu’da DDSA oluşumunu realist ve inşacı teorinin bir sentezi olarak ele almaktadır. DDSA ortaya çıkışına ilişkin üç bağımsız değişken önerilmektedir: yönetilemeyen alanlar, başarısız devlet, toplumsal kutuplaşma. Çalışmanın vaka incelemesi kısmını oluşturan ve 250’den fazla DDSA’nın faaliyet gösterdiği Suriye’de, HTŞ’nin nasıl pozitif ayrışarak iktidarı ele geçirdiğine ilişkin olarak makale, rekabetçi destek arayışı stratejisinin ve Aydınlı tarafından geliştirilen özerklik, temsiliyet ve etki çerçevelerinin etkin bir biçimde uygulanması olduğunu önermektedir. Bu çalışma, Ortadoğu’da DDSA oluşuma ilişkin realist ve inşacı yaklaşımın bir sentezini sunması ve rekabetçi destek arayışı stratejisi ile ARI modeli çerçevesinde HTŞ’nin nasıl baskın bir aktöre dönüştüğünü açıklaması cihetiyle literatüre katkı sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Durdu, M. B. (2026). IN THE SHADOW OF A FRACTURED STATE: THE SUCCESS OF HAYAT TAHRIR AL-SHAM IN SYRIA AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF NON-STATE ARMED ACTORS IN THE MIDDLE EAST. GSU Managerial and Social Sciences Letters, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1645319

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (70)

  1. Ajjoub, O. (2021, June 24). HTS is not al-Qaeda, but it is still an authoritarian regime to be reckoned with. Middle East Institute. https://www.mei.edu/publications/hts- not-al-qaeda-it-still-authoritarian-regime-be-reckoned (Access: 20.05.2025)
  2. Akkan, I., & Aksu, F. (2023). Instrumentalization of sectarianism in the Syrian crisis. Marmara University Journal of Political Sciences, 11(1), 154-179. https://doi.org/10.14782/marmarasbd.1212968
  3. Al-Tamimi, A. J. (2017, September). Islamic State and Kurds: Full documents and translation. Aymennjawad. https://aymennjawad.org/2017/09/islamic-state- andkurds-full-documents (Access: 25.03.2025)
  4. Al-Zaraee, N., & Shaar, K. (2021, June 21). The economics of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham. Middle East Institute. https://www.mei.edu/publications/economics-hayat-tahrir-al- sham (Access: 20.03.2025)
  5. Arreguín-Toft, I. (2005). How the weak win wars. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511521645
  6. Arsenault, E. G., & Bacon, T. (2014). Disaggregating and defeating terrorist safe havens. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 38(2), 85-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2014.977605 Althusser, L. (2014). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları.
  7. Aydınlı, E. (2013). Assessing violent nonstate actorness in global politics: A framework for analysis. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 28(3), 424-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2013.819316 Aydınlı, E. (2016). Violent non-state actors: From anarchists to jihadists. Routledge. Barnett, M. (1998). Dialogues in Arab politics: Negotiations in regional order. Columbia University Press.
  8. Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in international politics. International Organization, 59(1), 39-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818305050010 Bar-Tal, D., & Magal, T. (2021). Socio-psychological analysis of the deterioration of democracy and the rise of authoritarianism. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 42-61). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003057680-4
  9. Beckett, I. (2005). The future of insurgency. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 16(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0959231042000322549
  10. Biden, J. R. (2020, January 20). Why America must lead again. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-01-23/why-america- must-lead-again (Access: 20.05.2025) Bøås, M., & Jennings, K. M. (2005). Insecurity and development: The rhetoric of the ‘failed state.’ European Journal of Development Research, 17(3), 385-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578810500209148
  11. Bøås, M., & Jennings, K. M. (2007). ‘Failed states’ and ‘state failure’: Threats or opportunities? Globalizations, 4(4), 475-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730701695729
  12. Bruner, J. P. (2018). Locke, Nozick and the state of nature. Philosophical Studies, 177(3), 705-726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1201-9 Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511817762
  13. Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Carenzi, S. (2020). A downward scale shift? The case of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham. Perspectives on Terrorism, 14(6), 91-105. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26964728
  15. Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and mind (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791222 Clunan, A. L., & Trinkunas, H. A. (2010). Ungoverned spaces: Alternatives to state authority in an era of softened sovereignty. Stanford University Press.
  16. Cordesman, A. H. (2018, April 10). Syria: When and how does this war end? Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/syria-when-and- how-does-war-end (Access: 02.06.2025)
  17. Daher, J. (2016). Reassessing Hizbullah’s socioeconomic policies in Lebanon. Middle East Journal, 70(3), 399-418. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26426627
  18. Darwish, & Baladi. (2020, October). People in northern Syria live under threat of rising prices. Enab Baladi. https://english.enabbaladi.net/archives/2020/10/people-in- northern-syrian-live-under-threat-of-rising-prices/ (Access: 13.05.2025)
  19. Drevon, J., & Haenni, P. (2021). How global jihad relocalises and where it leads: The case of HTS, the former AQ franchise in Syria. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.379693
  20. El-Hokayem, E. (2007). Hizballah and Syria: Outgrowing the proxy relationship. The Washington Quarterly, 30(2), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1162/wash.2007.30.2.35
  21. Enab Baladi. (2024, July 30). Collapse of Assad regime anti-normalization act after attempts to revive it. Enab Baladi. https://english.enabbaladi.net/archives/2024/07/collapse-of-assad-regime-anti- normalization-act-after-attempts-to-revive-it/ Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. (2004). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. Pearson Longman. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB04880982
  22. Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building: Governance and world order in the 21st century. Cornell University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvrf8c1g
  23. Ganor, B. (2008). Terrorist organization typologies and the probability of a boomerang effect. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 31(4), 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100801925208
  24. Gelfand, M. J., & Lorente, R. (2021). Threat, tightness, and the evolutionary appeal of populist leaders. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 276-294). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003057680-18
  25. Ghani, A., & Lockhart, C. (2008). Fixing failed states: A framework for rebuilding a fractured world. Oxford University Press.
  26. Haas, M. L., & Lesch, D. W. (Eds.). (2013). The Arab Spring: Change and resistance in the Middle East. Westview Press. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB11237239
  27. Haid, H. (2019, April 24). HTS attempts state-building as survival strategy in Idlib. Arab News. https://www.arabnews.com/node/1487521 (Access: 22.05.2025) Hallaj, O. A. (2017, March). Geographies of absence: Radicalization and the shaping of the new Syrian territoriality. New England Journal of Public Policy, 29(1), Article 10. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp/vol29/iss1/10 (Access: 20.05.2025)
  28. Haring-Smith, W. (2012). All conflicts are local: An empirical analysis of local factors in violent civil conflict. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford]. British Library EThOS. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.543672
  29. Helman, G. B., & Ratner, S. R. (1992). Saving failed states. Foreign Policy, 89, 3-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149070 Hinnebusch, R. (2003). The international politics of the Middle East. Manchester University Press.
  30. Hinnebusch, R. (2019). Sectarianism and governance in Syria. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 19(1), 41-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/sena.12288
  31. Hinnebusch, R., & Imady, O. (2018). The Syrian uprising: Domestic origins and early trajectory. Routledge.
  32. Hobson, J. M. (2000). The state and international relations. Cambridge University Press. Hofmann, C., & Schneckener, U. (2011). How to engage armed groups? Reviewing options and strategies for third parties. Security and Peace, 29(4), 254-259. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24233364
  33. Hokayem, E. (2017). Syria’s uprising and the fracturing of the Levant. Routledge.
  34. Holliday, J. (2011). The struggle for Syria in 2011. Institute for the Study of War. https://www.understandingwar.org/report/struggle-syria-2011
  35. Holmqvist, C. (2005). Engaging armed non-state actors in post-conflict settings. In Security governance in post-conflict peacebuilding (p. 45).
  36. Human Rights Watch. (2012, May 27). Syria: UN inquiry should investigate Houla killings. https://www.hrw.org/news/2012/05/27/syria-un-inquiry-should-investigate- houla-killing (Access: 17.05.2025)
  37. Indyturk. (n.d.). El Kaide’yle bağını kestiğini iddia eden Türkiye’yi karşısına almak. Indyturk. https://www.indyturk.com/node/191046/haber/el- kaide%E2%80%99yleba%C4%9F%C4%B1n%C4%B1-kesti%C4%9Fini-iddia- edent%C3%BCrkiye%E2%80%99yi-kar%C5%9F%C4%B1s%C4%B1na-almak (Access: 17.05.2025)
  38. International Council on Human Rights Policy. (2000). Ends & means: Human rights approaches to armed groups. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/ends-and-means- human-rights-approaches-armed-groups Jones, S. G., Doxsee, C., & Harrington, N. (2020, October 26). The war comes home: The evolution of domestic terrorism in the United States. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/war-comes-home-evolution- domestic-terrorism-united-states (Access: 20.05.2025)
  39. Juneau, T. (2015). The civil war in Syria and Canada’s containment policy. International Journal, 70(3), 471-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702015584581
  40. Juneau, T. (2019). The enduring constraints on Iran’s power after the nuclear deal. Political Science Quarterly, 134(1), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12869 Juusor Araştırma Merkezi. (2020, August 1). Suriye'de İran güçlerinin bulunduğu noktalar. Retrieved February 5, 2025, from https://jusoor.co/tr/details/suriyede- i%CC%87ran-g%C3%BC%C3%A7lerinin-bulundu%C4%9Fu-noktalar-01-08- 2020 (Access: 20.05.2025)
  41. Keser, A., & Fakhoury, F. (2022). Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) from an insurgent group to a local authority: Emergence, development and social support base. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2022.2082833
  42. Khaddour, K. (2015, July 8). The Syrian regime’s hold on the Syrian state. Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center. Retrieved January 13, 2025, from https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2015/07/the-assad-regimes-hold-on-the- syrian-state?lang=en&center=middle-east (Access: 25.05.2025)
  43. Khalifa, D. (2020). The jihadist factor in Syria’s Idlib: A conversation with Abu Muhammad al-Jolani. International Crisis Group. Retrieved January 16, 2025, from https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/east-mediterranean- mena/syria/jihadist-factor-syrias-idlib-conversation-abu-muhammad-al-jolani
  44. Khan, A. (2022). State governance in the ungoverned territories—Theoretical considerations. In A. Khan (Ed.), Mainstreaming the tribal areas (ex-FATA) of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan (Chapter 2, pp. 19-35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1794-3_2
  45. Khatib, L. (2017). Syria, Saudi Arabia, the U.A.E. and Qatar: The ‘sectarianization’ of the Syrian conflict and undermining of democratization in the region. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 46(3), 385-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2017.1408456
  46. Kocher, M. A., Pepinsky, T. B., & Kalyvas, S. N. (2011). Aerial bombing and counterinsurgency in the Vietnam War. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00490
  47. Korteweg, R. (2008). Black holes: On terrorist sanctuaries and governmental weakness. Civil Wars, 10(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698240701835482 Levitt, M. (2024, December 17). How Hayat Tahrir al-Sham landed on U.S. terrorist lists and why it should stay there for now. Washington Institute Policy Analysis, 3969. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/pdf/view/19113/en (Access: 16.04.2025)
  48. Lustick, I. S. (1997). The absence of Middle Eastern great powers: Political “backwardness” in historical perspective. International Organization, 51(4), 653- 683. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550483
  49. Mampilly, Z., & Stewart, M. A. (2020). A typology of rebel political institutional arrangements. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 65(1), 15-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002720935642 McCoy, J., & Rahman, T. (2016). Polarized democracies in comparative perspective: Toward a conceptual framework. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336830321_Polarized_Democracies_in_C omparative_Perspective_Toward_a_Conceptual_Framework
  50. McCoy, J., & Somer, M. (2018). Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: Comparative evidence and possible remedies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 234-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818782
  51. Nasr, V. (2007). The Shia revival: How conflicts within Islam will shape the future. W. W. Norton & Company.
  52. Oakley, D., & Proctor, P. (2012). Ten years of GWOT, the failure of democratization, and the fallacy of “ungoverned spaces”. Journal of Strategic Security, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.5.1.1
  53. Omran Center. (2017, June 14). The role of jihadi movements in Syrian local governance. https://omranstudies.org/job/author/51-omran-center.html?limit=10&start=90 (Access: 15.04.2025)
  54. Özdemir, Ç. (2016). Suriye’de iç savaşın nedenleri: Otokratik yönetim mi, bölgesel ve küresel güçler mi? Bilgi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2, 81-102. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/301340
  55. Özdemir, Ö. B. (2023). Suriye iç savaşında devlet dışı silahlı aktörler üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir analiz: DAEŞ ve Nusra Cephesi örnekleri [PhD Thesis, Sakarya University]. https://acikerisim.sakarya.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/20.500.12619/100700/T10408.pd f?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  56. Özkızılcık, Ö. (2020, March). İdlib’de ateşkes sonrası yol haritası (SETA Güvenlik Analiz No. 314). SETA. https://www.setav.org/assets/uploads/2020/03/A314.pdf (Access: 22.05.2025) Palmer, M. (2019). The future of the Middle East: Faith, force, and finance. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  57. Perthes, V. (2004). Syria under Bashar al-Asad: Modernisation and the limits of change. Oxford University Press for International Institute for Strategic Studies.
  58. Phillips, C. (2015). Sectarianism and conflict in Syria. Third World Quarterly, 36(2), 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1015788
  59. Policzer, P. (2005). Neither terrorists nor freedom fighters. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Conference, 3-5 March 2005. https://www.resolvenet.org/system/files/2019- 02/Neither_terrorists_nor_freedom_fighters.pdf Porter, E., & Weinstein, J. (2005, February). Rebuilding weak states. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/rebuilding-weak-states (Access: 12.03.2025)
  60. Rabasa, A., Boraz, S., Chalk, P., Cragin, K., Karasik, T. W., Moroney, J. D. P., O’Brien, K. A., & Peters, J. E. (2007). Ungoverned territories: Understanding and reducing terrorism risks. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/mg561
  61. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2012, July 19). No. 190, press release regarding the UN Security Council being unable to reach once more a decision on Syria. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_-190_-19-july-2012_-press-release-regarding-the- un-security-council-being-unable-to-reach-once-more-a-decision-on-syria.en.mfa (Access: 05.03.2025) Rosenau, J. N. (1990). Previewing postinternational politics. In Turbulence in world politics: A theory of change and continuity (pp. 3-20). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv301hg5.6
  62. Salloukh, B. F. (2017). The Syrian war: Spillover effects on Lebanon. Middle East Policy, 24(1), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12252
  63. Sartori, G. (2005). Party types, organisation and functions. West European Politics, 28(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238042000334268 Solomon, C. (2021). In search of greater Syria: The history and politics of the Syrian Social Nationalist Party. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  64. Stein, E. (2024). Ortadoğu’da uluslararası ilişkiler: Hegemonya stratejileri ve bölgesel düzen. Fol Kitap. ISBN 6256584368
  65. Tetik, Ü. (2022). Orta Doğu’da devlet dışı silahlı aktörlerin oluşumu: Irak ve Suriye. Siyasal Kitabevi.
  66. Trump, D. J. (2017, December 18). National Security Strategy of the United States of America [Government report]. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/message-the-congress-transmitting- the-2017-national-security-strategy (Access: 12.05.2025)
  67. Türk, O., & Kıyıcı, H. (2024). Teritoryal düzenden devletleşmeye: Heyet Tahrir El-Şam (HTŞ). Adam Academy Journal of Social Sciences, 14(2), 275-302. https://doi.org/10.31679/adamakademi.1402003
  68. United Nations Development Programme. (2006). Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) project and related projects: Final evaluation report. https://erc.undp.org/evaluation/documents/download/1045 Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill Humanities, Social Sciences & World Languages.
  69. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764 Williams, P. (2008). Violent non-state actors and national and international security. International Relations and Security Network (ISN), ETH Zurich.
  70. Yeşiltaş, M., & Kardaş, T. (2018). Non-state armed actors in the Middle East: Geopolitics, ideology, and strategy. Palgrave Macmillan.