SavedAdd your journal

Journals / CURARE Journal of Nursing / 2026 / Sayı: 11

Experiences with Chemical Restraint Application in İntensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study

Abdülmenef Adanır(İzmir Karaburun İlçe Devlet Hastanesi)0000-0002-7974-7718
Büşra Ertuğrul(University College Dublin School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems)0000-0001-6671-3693
Dilek Özden(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-8139-5558
Pages
25–34
Publication Date
2026-07-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The findings indicate that chemical restraint decisions are influenced by patient characteristics, healthcare professional–related factors, and physicians’ sedation preferences, while the lack of standardised decision-making, organisational limitations, workload, and limited experience pose significant challenges in practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In the chemical restraint management process, nurses have some responsibilities, such as applying the requested sedation, keeping the sedation at the targeted level, and monitoring the effects, but there is uncertainty in the management of these patients, which leads to unsafe practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 20 nurses from the general, anaesthesia, internal medicine, and neurosurgery intensive care units of a training and research hospital in western Türkiye between November 2020 and February 2021.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The findings indicate that chemical restraint decisions are influenced by patient characteristics, healthcare professional–related factors, and physicians’ sedation preferences, while the lack of standardised decision-making, organisational limitations, workload, and limited experience pose significant challenges in practice.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:chemical restraint · sedation · nurse

Abstract

Objective: In the chemical restraint management process, nurses have some responsibilities, such as applying the requested sedation, keeping the sedation at the targeted level, and monitoring the effects, but there is uncertainty in the management of these patients, which leads to unsafe practices. The aim of this study is to determine the experiences of intensive care nurses with chemical restraint applications. Methods: The study included 20 nurses from the general, anaesthesia, internal medicine, and neurosurgery intensive care units of a training and research hospital in western Türkiye between November 2020 and February 2021. Data were collected using a Socio-Demographic Information Form, a Semi-Structured Interview Form, and a voice recorder. Results: because of the analysis, two main themes were elicited from the data: factors affecting the chemical restraint (CR) decision and difficulties in the CR implementation process. Conclusion: The findings indicate that chemical restraint decisions are influenced by patient characteristics, healthcare professional–related factors, and physicians’ sedation preferences, while the lack of standardised decision-making, organisational limitations, workload, and limited experience pose significant challenges in practice. Although the study was conducted with a small sample of 20 nurses, the results provide valuable insights that may contribute to improving safe chemical restraint practices in intensive care settings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Adanır, A., Ertuğrul, B., Özden, D. (2026). Experiences with Chemical Restraint Application in İntensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study. CURARE Journal of Nursing, Sayı: 11, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.26650/CURARE.2026.1811092

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Adams AMN, Chamberlain D, Grønkjær M, Thorup CB & Conroy T. Caring for patients displaying agitated behaviours in the intensive care unit–A mixed-methods systematic review. Aust Crit Care, 2022;35(4), 454-465. google scholar
  2. Krewulak KD, Stelfox HT, Leigh JP, Ely EW & Fiest KM. Incidence and prevalence of delirium subtypes in an adult ICU: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med, 2018;46, 2029–2035. google scholar
  3. Bray K, Hill K, Robson W, Leaver G, Walker N, O’Leary M, et al. British Association of Critical Care Nurses position statement on the use of restraint in adult critical care units. Nurs Crit Care, 2004;9, 199–212. google scholar
  4. Khan BA, Fadel WF, Tricker JL, Carlos WG, Farber MO, Hui SL, et al. Effectiveness of implementing a wake up and breathe program on sedation and delirium in the ICU. Crit Care Med, 2014;42, e791–e795. google scholar
  5. Hofsø K & Coyer FM. Chemical and physical restraints in the management of mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: Contributing factors. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2007;23(5), 249–255. google scholar
  6. Martin B. Restraint use in acute and critical care settings: Changing practice. AACN Clinical Issues, 2002;13(2), 294–306. google scholar
  7. Benbenbishty J, Adam S & Endacott R. Physical restraint use in intensive care units across Europe: The PRICE study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2010;26, 241–245. google scholar
  8. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJ, Pandharipande PP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2018;46(9), 825-873. google scholar
  9. Vincent JL, Shehabi Y, Walsh TS, Pandharipande PP, Ball JA, Spronk P, et al. Comfort and patient-centred care without excessive sedation: The eCASH concept. Intensive Care Medicine, 2016;42(6), 962–971. google scholar
  10. Shehabi Y, Chan L, Kadiman S, Alias A, Ismail WN, Tan MATI, et al. Sedation depth and long-term mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults: a prospective longitudinal multicentre cohort study. Intensive Care Med, 2013;39(5), 910-918. google scholar
  11. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gélinas C, Dasta JF, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med, 2013;41, 263–306. google scholar
  12. Maccioli GA, Dorman T, Brown BR, Mazuski JE, McLean BA, Kuszaj JM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the maintenance of patient physical safety in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med, 2003;31(11), 2665–2676. google scholar
  13. The TEAM Study Investigators. Early mobilization and recovery in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: A bi-national, multi-centre, prospective cohort study. Crit Care Med, 2015;19, 81. google scholar
  14. Walsh TS, Kydonaki K, Antonelli J, Stephen J, Lee RJ, Everingham K, et al. Staff education, regular sedation and analgesia quality feedback, and a sedation monitoring technology for improving sedation and analgesia quality for critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet Respir Med 2016;4(10), 807-817. google scholar
  15. Elliott D, Aitken LM, Bucknall TK, Seppelt IM, Webb SA, Weisbrodt L, et al. Patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a multicentre, binational point prevalence study of analgesia, sedation and delirium management. Crit Care Resuscitation 2013;15(3), 213-219. google scholar
  16. Teece A, Baker J & Smith H. Identifying determinants for the application of physical or chemical restraint in the management of psychomotor agitation on the critical care unit. J Clin Nurs, 2020;29(1–2), 5–19. google scholar
  17. 17 Palacios‐Cena D, Cachon‐Perez JM, Martinez‐Piedrola R, Gueita‐ Rodriguez J, Perez‐ Deheredia M & Fernandez‐Delaspenas C. How do doctors and nurses manage delirium in intensive care units? BMJ Open, 2016;6(1), e009678. google scholar
  18. Kydonaki K, Hanley J, Huby G, Antonelli J & Walsh TS. Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care. BMJ Open, 2019;9, e024549. google scholar
  19. Suliman M, Aloush S & Al-Awamreh K. Knowledge, attitude and practice of intensive care unit nurses about physical restraint. Nurs Crit Care, 2017;22, 264–269. google scholar
  20. Freeman S, Hallett C & McHugh G. Physical restraint: Experiences, attitudes and opinions of adult intensive care unit nurses. Nurs Crit Care, 2016;21, 78–87. google scholar
  21. Ramoo V, Abdullah KL, Tan PS, Wong LP & Chua PY. Intervention to improve intensive care nurses’ knowledge of sedation assessment and management. Nurs Crit Care, 2016;21(5), 287-294. google scholar
  22. Alostaz Z, Rose L, Mehta S, Johnston L, Dale CM. Interprofessional intensive care unit (ICU) team perspectives on physical restraint practices and minimization strategies in an adult ICU: A qualitative study of contextual influences. Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Jan;29(1):90-98. google scholar
  23. Siegrist-Dreier S, Barbezat I, Thomann S, Richter D, Hahn S, Schmitt KU. Restraining patients in acute care hospitals-A qualitative study on the experiences of healthcare staff. Nurs Open. 2022 Mar;9(2):1311-1321. google scholar
  24. Bachmann L, Vatne S, Mundal IP. Safeguarding patients while implementing mechanical restraints: A qualitative study of nurses and ward staff’s perceptions and assessment. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Feb;32(3-4):438-451. google scholar
  25. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res. Nurs. Health. 2000;23(4), 334-340. google scholar
  26. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. (Original work published 2006) google scholar
  27. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. 2013. google scholar
  28. Yıldırım A & Şimşek H. Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık;2016. google scholar Pandey SC, Patnaik S. ‘Establishing reliability and validity in qualitative inquiry: a critical examination’. Jharkhand J Dev Manag Stud XISS, 2014;12(1), 5743‐5753. google scholar
  29. Speziale HS, Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. google scholar
  30. Burla L, Knierim B, Barth J, Liewald K, Duetz M, Abel T. From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nurs Res. 2008;57(2), 113-117. google scholar
  31. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criterio for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32‐ item checklist for interviews and focus group’. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6), 349‐357. google scholar
  32. Pisani MA, Bramley K, Vest MT, Akgün KM, Araujo KL & Murphy TE. Patterns of opiate, benzodiazepine, and antipsychotic drug dosing in older patients in a medical intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care, 2015;22(5), 62-69. google scholar
  33. Via-Clavero G, Sanjuán-Naváis M, Romero-García M, Cueva-Ariza L, Martínez-Estalella G, Plata-Menchaca E, et al. Eliciting critical care nurses’ beliefs regarding physical restraint use. Nurs Ethics, 2020;26(5), 1458-1472. google scholar
  34. Aitken LM, Marshall AP, Elliott R & McKinley S. Critical care nurses’ decision making: sedation assessment and management in intensive care. J Clin Nurs, 2009;18(1), 36-45. Ertuğrul B & Özden D. Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding physical restraint in Turkish intensive care units. Nurs Crit Care, 2021;26(4), 253–261. google scholar
  35. Acevedo-Nuevo M, González-Gil MT, Romera-Ortega MA, Latorre-Marco I & RodríguezHuerta MD. The early diagnosis and management of mixed delirium in a patient placed on ECMO and with difficult sedation: A case report. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2018;44, 110-114. google scholar
  36. Joint Commission. Joint Commission Standards on Restraint and Seclusion/Nonviolent Crisis Intervention Program (2009). google scholar
  37. Wong AHW, Combellick J, Wispelwey BA, Squires A & Gang M. The patient care paradox: an inter professional qualitative study of agitated patient care in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med, 2017;24(2), 226-235. google scholar
  38. Lopetrone R. (2006) Managing post-operative delirium from the perspective of front line staff. MR17555 Royal Roads University (Canada). Available online: http://0-search.proquest.com.wam.leeds.ac.uk/docview/304910213?accountid=14664 [Accessed. 3] google scholar
  39. Li X & Fawcett TN. Clinical decision making on the use of physical restraint in intensive care units. Int J Nurs Sci, 2014;1, 446–450. google scholar