SavedAdd your journal

Journals / CURARE Journal of Nursing / 2026 / Sayı: 11

The Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale for New Graduate Nurses

Yeni Mezun Hemşireler İçin Hemşirelik Uygulamalarına Hazırlık Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği

Gamze Kayalı(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2482-5755
Şengül Üzen Cura(ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9649-6976
Pages
56–63
Publication Date
2026-07-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: The 33-item Turkish version of the NPRS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the readiness of new graduate nurses for nursing practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale (NPRS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were collected between February and May 2023.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: The 33-item Turkish version of the NPRS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the readiness of new graduate nurses for nursing practice.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yeni mezun · hemşire · hazır oluş

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale (NPRS). Design: This study employed methodological design. The data were collected between February and May 2023. The study was concluded with the participation of 225 novice nurses and fourth-year nursing students. Methods: Descriptive information form, the NPRS and the Work Readiness Scale for graduate nurses (WRS-GN) were used for data collection. The data were evaluated using descriptive statistics, validity analyses and reliability analyses. Results: The content validity index of the scale was 0.90. Items 33 and 35 were excluded from the scale on the grounds that they exhibited a standardized regression coefficient of 0.579 and a standardized residual covariance value of 5.775, respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the scale, conducted after the removal of the afore-mentioned two items, demonstrated an optimal fit. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale reached 0.96, while the item-total score correlations of all items within the scale exceeded 0.30, indicating a high level of internal consistency. A statistically significant positive correlation was identified between the NPRS and the WRS-GN (r=0.739; p<0.001). Conclusions: The 33-item Turkish version of the NPRS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the readiness of new graduate nurses for nursing practice.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Hemşirelik Uygulamalarına Hazır Oluş Ölçeği’nin (NPRS) Türkçe versiyonunun psikometrik özelliklerini değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: Bu çalışma metodolojik tasarımda yürütülmüştür. Veriler Şubat–Mayıs 2023 tarihleri arasında toplanmıştır. Araştırma, 225 yeni mezun hemşire ve dördüncü sınıf hemşirelik öğrencisinin katılımıyla tamamlanmıştır. Veri toplama araçları olarak Tanıtıcı Bilgi Formu, NPRS ve Yeni Mezun Hemşireler için İşe Hazır Oluş Ölçeği (WRS-GN) kullanılmıştır. Veriler; tanımlayıcı istatistikler, geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Ölçeğin kapsam geçerlik indeksi 0,90 olarak bulunmuştur. Standartlaştırılmış regresyon katsayısının 0,579 olması ve standartlaştırılmış hata kovaryans değerinin 5,775 olması gerekçeleriyle 33. ve 35. maddeler ölçekten çıkarılmıştır. Bu iki maddenin çıkarılmasının ardından gerçekleştirilen doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) sonuçları, ölçeğin iyi uyum gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Ölçeğin Cronbach alfa katsayısı 0,96 olup, tüm maddelerin madde-toplam puan korelasyonlarının 0,30’un üzerinde olduğu belirlenmiştir; bu durum ölçeğin yüksek düzeyde iç tutarlılığa sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. NPRS ile WRS-GN arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif yönde güçlü bir ilişki bulunmuştur (r=0,739; p<0,001). Sonuç: NPRS’nin 33 maddelik Türkçe formu, yeni mezun hemşirelerin mesleki uygulamalara hazır oluş düzeylerini ölçmede geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kayalı, G., Cura, Ş. Ü. (2026). The Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale for New Graduate Nurses. CURARE Journal of Nursing, Sayı: 11, 56–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/1644774

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Şendir M, Büyükyılmaz F. Hemşirelik Tanısı. İçinde T. Atabek Aştı, A. Karadağ. Hemşirelik Esasları Bilgiden Uygulamaya: Kavramlar-İlkeler-Beceriler. 2021:139-52. google scholar
  2. Willis E, Zelenikova R, Bail K, Papastavrou E. The globalization of missed nursing care terminology. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2021;27(1):e12859. google scholar
  3. HUÇEP. Hemşirelik Ulusal Çekirdek Programı. google scholar
  4. Coleman P. Cultural differences in General and Psychiatric Nurses: A critical analysis using Social Identity Theory. Aporia: The Nursing Journal. 2019;10(2):17-27. google scholar
  5. Karabulut N, Yaman Aktaş Y, Gürçayır D, Bulut G, Kara A, Yildiz B. The effect of perceived stress and personality types of nursing college students on attitudes towards nursing profession during Covid-19 pandemic. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies. 2021;16(4):345-57. google scholar
  6. Kunaviktikul W, Turale S. Internationalizing nursing curricula in a rapidly globalizing world. Nurse Education in Practice. 2020;43:102704. google scholar
  7. Çalışkan Alkan M, Çelik Durmuş S. The Effect of Nurses’ Professionalism Attitudes on Nurse–Nurse Collaboration in a City Hospital in Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study. Hospital topics. 2023;101(1):39-47. google scholar
  8. Aydemir Gedük E. Developing Roles Of The Nursing Profession. Journal of Health Science and Profession 2018;5(2):253-8. google scholar
  9. Caballero CL, Walker A, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M. The Work Readiness Scale (WRS): Developing a measure to assess work readiness in college graduates. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability. 2011;2(1):41-54. google scholar
  10. Walker A, Yong M, Pang L, Fullarton C, Costa B, Dunning AT. Work readiness of graduate health professionals. Nurse Education Today. 2013;33(2):116-22. google scholar
  11. Baumann A, Crea-Arsenio M, Hunsberger M, Fleming-Carroll B, M K. Work readiness, transition and integration: the challenge of specialty practice. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(4):823– 33. google scholar
  12. Mirza N, Manankil-Rankin L, Prentice D, Hagerman L. A, Draenos C. Practice readiness of new nursing graduates: a concept analysis. Nurse Education in Practice. 2019;37:68-74. google scholar
  13. Jarvinen T, Eklof N, Salminen L. Factors related to nursing students’ readiness to enter working life: a scoping literature review. Nurse Education in Practice. 2018;29:191-9. google scholar
  14. Park U, Oh E. G. Factors related to intensive care unit nurses’ patient centered communication competency. Journal of Korean Critical Nursing. 2018;11(2):51-62. google scholar
  15. Zhang Y, Wu J, Fang Z, Zhang Y, Wong FKY. Newly graduated nurses’ intention to leave in their first year of practice in Shanghai: A longitudinal study. Nursing Outlook. 2017;65(2):202-11. google scholar
  16. Ulupinar S, Aydogan Y. New graduate nurses’ satisfaction, adaptation and intention to leave in their first year: A descriptive study. Journal of Nursing Management. 2021;29(6):1830-40. google scholar
  17. NSI. 2023 NSI National Health Care Retention & RN Staffing Report. East Petersburg, PA: NSI Nursing Solutions, Inc, 2023. google scholar Beyhan A, Ergun A. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Work Readiness Scale for graduate nurses among senior nursing students. Journal of Nursology. 2022;25(4):230-7. google scholar
  18. Kuleyin B, Basaran-Acil S. The Turkish version of the Casey-Fink Readiness for Practice Scale: A validity and reliability study. Nurse Education in Practice. 2023;70:103667. google scholar
  19. Yıldız Keskin A, Aslan M. Turkish Adaptation of The Work Readiness Scale for Graduated Nurses: Validity and Reliability. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences. 2021;10(1):70-80. google scholar
  20. Casey K, Fink R, Jaynes C, Campbell L, Cook P, Wilson V. Readiness for practice: The senior practicum experience. 2011;50(11):646-52. google scholar
  21. Kim J, Shin S. Development of the Nursing Practice Readiness Scale for new graduate nurses: A methodological study. Nurse Education in Practice. 2022;59:103298. google scholar
  22. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in Public Health. 2018;6:149. google scholar
  23. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, S M, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health. 2005;8(2):94-104. google scholar
  24. Çapık C, Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Intercultural Scale Adaptation Stages, Language and Culture Adaptation: Updated Guideline. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing. 2018;26(3):199-210. google scholar
  25. Karakoç FY, Dönmez L. Basic Principles Of Scale Development. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2014;13(40):39-49. google scholar
  26. Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research. 1992;5(4):194-7. google scholar
  27. Erdoğan S, Nahcivan N, Esin M. N. Hemşirelikte Araştırma: Süreç, Uygulama ve Kritik. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2014. google scholar
  28. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. China: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017. google scholar
  29. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing 2001;1(1):55-86. google scholar
  30. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications; 2015. google scholar
  31. Özdemir Z. Development of a Likert Type Attitude Scale in Health Sciences. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing. 2018;5(1):60-8. google scholar