Journals / International Journal of Electronics Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Evaluation of the Effects of Franchising Associations on Franchising Decisions of Companies in Turkey

Pages
1201–1226
Publication Date
2016-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To be successful at work without experience in training people and work for managing continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is a form of giving a license from the elements

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, it is examined the effect of International Franchising Association (UFRAD) on tbe decision making process of franchisee companies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Operating franchising, franchisor has a trademark and the franchisee sells products under the name of the franchisers areas of advertising, training, management and the benefit as a whole package of 1itera discounts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To be successful at work without experience in training people and work for managing continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is a form of giving a license from the elements
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Franchising · Franchising Decisions · Franchising Associations

Abstract

In the study, it is examined the effect of International Franchising Association (UFRAD) on tbe decision making process of franchisee companies. A survey has been carried out on franchisee companies, after the survey interview, results are discussed and presented. Franchising offers a useful way to entrepreneurs to start a new business. Operating franchising, franchisor has a trademark and the franchisee sells products under the name of the franchisers areas of advertising, training, management and the benefit as a whole package of 1itera discounts. To be successful at work without experience in training people and work for managing continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is a form of giving a license from the elements

🔖

Cite This Article

Arıcı, G., Karaduman, İ. (2016). Evaluation of the Effects of Franchising Associations on Franchising Decisions of Companies in Turkey. International Journal of Electronics Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 1201–1226. https://ajindex.com/articles/1643510

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (51)

  1. Alon, M. (2006). Service franchising:
  2. A global perspective. Service Franchising: A Global Perspective. http://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28256-4
  3. Anwar, S. T. (2011). Franchising:
  4. Category Issues, Changing Dynamics and Competitiveness. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 21(3), 241–255. http://doi.org/10.1108/105692111111
  5. Asarpota, J. (2014). Global
  6. Franchising Operational Issues. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 193–203. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.0 024 Scheffea,b 1 4363 36 7160 36 7747 Sig. 000.589
  7. Franchising Operational Issues. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 193–203. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.0 024
  8. Baena, V. (2009). Modeling Global
  9. Franchising in Emerging Markets: An Entry Mode Analysis. Journal of East-West Business, 15(3), 164–188. http://doi.org/10.1080/106698609034
  10. Cebeci, R. (2005). “Franchising
  11. Rehberi”. Ankara:KOSGEB Girişimciliği Destekleme Merkezi Yayınları Combs, J. G., Michael, S. C., & Castrogiovanni, G. J. (2004).
  12. Franchising: A review and avenues to greater theoretical diversity. Journal of Management. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.0
  13. Dant, R. P., Gr??nhagen, M., & Windsperger, J. (2011). Franchising
  14. Research Frontiers for the Twenty- First Century. Journal of Retailing, (3), 253–268. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.08 002
  15. De Castro, L. M., Mota, J., & Marnoto, S. (2009). Toward a relational perspective of franchising chains. Service Business, 3(1), 15–30. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-008- 6
  16. Doherty, A. M. (2009). Market and partner selection processes in international retail franchising.
  17. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), –534. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008. 011
  18. Doherty, A. M., & Quinn, B. (1999).
  19. International retail franchising: an agency theory perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(6), –237. http://doi.org/10.1108/095905599102
  20. Elango, B., & Fried, V. H. (1997).
  21. Franchising research: A literature review and synthesis. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(3), –81. Hoffman, R. C., & Preble, J. F. (2004). Global franchising: current status and future challenges. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(2), 101– http://doi.org/10.1108/088760404105
  22. Inma, C. (2005). Purposeful franchising: Re-thinking of the franchising rationale. Singapore
  23. Management Review, 27(1), 27–48. Knight, R. M. (1986). Franchising from the Franchisor and Franchisee
  24. Points of View. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(3), 8–15. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.asp x?direct=true&db=buh&AN=526517 &site=ehost-live
  25. Lafontaine, F. (1992). Agency Theory and Franchising: Some Empirical
  26. Results. The RAND Journal of Economics, 23(2), 263–283. http://doi.org/10.2307/2555988 Madanoglu, M., Lee, K., &
  27. Castrogiovanni, G. J. (2011).
  28. Franchising and firm financial performance among U.S. restaurants. Journal of Retailing, 87(3), 406–417. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.02 003
  29. Martin, R. E. (1988). Franchising and Risk Management. The American
  30. Economic Review, 78(5), 954–968. http://doi.org/10.2307/1807159
  31. Ögdüm, Ç. (1994). “Bir İşletmecilik
  32. Sistemi Olarak Franchise İlişkisinin İncelenmesi”, İstanbul: İ.Ü. Yayınlanmamıs Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Öztürk, P. (1998). “Franchising ve Perakende Ticaret”, Ankara: Ekonomik Forum.
  33. Quinn, B., & Alexander, N. (2002).
  34. International retail franchising: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 30(5), 264–276. http://doi.org/10.1108/095905502104
  35. Salar, M., & Salar, O. (2014).
  36. Determining Pros and Cons of Franchising by Using Swot Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 515–519. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.0 1385
  37. Sashi, C. M., & Karuppur, D. P. (2002). Franchising in global markets: towards a conceptual framework. International Marketing Review, 19(5), 499–524. http://doi.org/10.1108/026513302104
  38. Shane, S. a., & Hoy, F. (1996).
  39. Franchising: A gateway to cooperative entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(96), 325– http://doi.org/10.1016/0883- (96)00059-6
  40. Tracey, P., & Jarvis, O. (2007).
  41. Toward a theory of social venture franchising. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(5), 667–685. Baena, V. (2009). Modeling Global
  42. Toward a theory of social venture franchising. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(5), 667–685. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 2007.00194.x
  43. Ulaş, E. (1999). “ Franchising
  44. Sistemi”. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Wulff, E. B. (2005). International
  45. Franchising. The International Lawyer. http://doi.org/10.2307/40707976
  46. Yorke, M. (1993). Quality assurance for higher education franchising.
  47. Higher Education, 26(2), 167–182. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01406950 Yüksel, Ü. (2004). Hizmet
  48. Pazarlaması. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayın. World Franchise Council Web Site, http://www.worldfranchisecouncil.net / 21.03.2016
  49. Franchising Operational Issues. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 193–203. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.0 024 Scheffea,b 1 4363 36 7160 36 7747 Sig. 000.589
  50. Rehberi”. Ankara:KOSGEB Girişimciliği Destekleme Merkezi Yayınları Combs, J. G., Michael, S. C., & Castrogiovanni, G. J. (2004).
  51. Franchising research: A literature review and synthesis. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(3), –81. Hoffman, R. C., & Preble, J. F. (2004). Global franchising: current status and future challenges. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(2), 101– http://doi.org/10.1108/088760404105