To be successful at work without experience in training people and work for managing continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is a form of giving a license from the elements
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, it is examined the effect of International Franchising Association (UFRAD) on tbe decision making process of franchisee companies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Operating franchising, franchisor has a trademark and the franchisee sells products under the name of the franchisers areas of advertising, training, management and the benefit as a whole package of 1itera discounts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To be successful at work without experience in training people and work for managing continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is a form of giving a license from the elements
In the study, it is examined the effect of International Franchising Association (UFRAD) on tbe decision making process of franchisee companies. A survey has been carried out on franchisee companies, after the survey interview, results are discussed and presented. Franchising offers a useful way to entrepreneurs to start a new business. Operating franchising, franchisor has a trademark and the franchisee sells products under the name of the franchisers areas of advertising, training, management and the benefit as a whole package of 1itera discounts. To be successful at work without experience in training people and work for managing continuous assistance Franchising is the best approach because it is a form of giving a license from the elements
Arıcı, G., Karaduman, İ. (2016). Evaluation of the Effects of Franchising Associations on Franchising Decisions of Companies in Turkey. International Journal of Electronics Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 1201–1226. https://ajindex.com/articles/1643510
Category Issues, Changing Dynamics and Competitiveness. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 21(3), 241–255. http://doi.org/10.1108/105692111111
Asarpota, J. (2014). Global
Franchising Operational Issues. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 193–203. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.0 024 Scheffea,b 1 4363 36 7160 36 7747 Sig. 000.589
De Castro, L. M., Mota, J., & Marnoto, S. (2009). Toward a relational perspective of franchising chains. Service Business, 3(1), 15–30. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-008- 6
Doherty, A. M. (2009). Market and partner selection processes in international retail franchising.
International retail franchising: an agency theory perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(6), –237. http://doi.org/10.1108/095905599102
Elango, B., & Fried, V. H. (1997).
Franchising research: A literature review and synthesis. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(3), –81. Hoffman, R. C., & Preble, J. F. (2004). Global franchising: current status and future challenges. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(2), 101– http://doi.org/10.1108/088760404105
Inma, C. (2005). Purposeful franchising: Re-thinking of the franchising rationale. Singapore
Management Review, 27(1), 27–48. Knight, R. M. (1986). Franchising from the Franchisor and Franchisee
Points of View. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(3), 8–15. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.asp x?direct=true&db=buh&AN=526517 &site=ehost-live
Lafontaine, F. (1992). Agency Theory and Franchising: Some Empirical
Sistemi Olarak Franchise İlişkisinin İncelenmesi”, İstanbul: İ.Ü. Yayınlanmamıs Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Öztürk, P. (1998). “Franchising ve Perakende Ticaret”, Ankara: Ekonomik Forum.
Quinn, B., & Alexander, N. (2002).
International retail franchising: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 30(5), 264–276. http://doi.org/10.1108/095905502104
Salar, M., & Salar, O. (2014).
Determining Pros and Cons of Franchising by Using Swot Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 515–519. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.0 1385
Sashi, C. M., & Karuppur, D. P. (2002). Franchising in global markets: towards a conceptual framework. International Marketing Review, 19(5), 499–524. http://doi.org/10.1108/026513302104
Shane, S. a., & Hoy, F. (1996).
Franchising: A gateway to cooperative entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(96), 325– http://doi.org/10.1016/0883- (96)00059-6
Tracey, P., & Jarvis, O. (2007).
Toward a theory of social venture franchising. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(5), 667–685. Baena, V. (2009). Modeling Global
Toward a theory of social venture franchising. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(5), 667–685. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 2007.00194.x
Ulaş, E. (1999). “ Franchising
Sistemi”. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Wulff, E. B. (2005). International
Franchising Operational Issues. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 193–203. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.0 024 Scheffea,b 1 4363 36 7160 36 7747 Sig. 000.589
Rehberi”. Ankara:KOSGEB Girişimciliği Destekleme Merkezi Yayınları Combs, J. G., Michael, S. C., & Castrogiovanni, G. J. (2004).
Franchising research: A literature review and synthesis. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(3), –81. Hoffman, R. C., & Preble, J. F. (2004). Global franchising: current status and future challenges. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(2), 101– http://doi.org/10.1108/088760404105