Journals / İş ve İnsan Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Dark Leadership at the Workplace

İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik

Pages
65–76
Publication Date
2016-10-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings were discussed in terms of their contributions to the management and organization literature and practical implications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to uncover the behaviors that constitute the dark side of leadership, the impacts of these behaviors on employees and the employees’ reactions to these behaviors in Turkish context.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Interviews were done with 9 and focus group interview was done with 4 participants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings were discussed in terms of their contributions to the management and organization literature and practical implications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Liderlik · Zehirleyici liderlik · İstismarcı yönetim

Abstract

The aim of this research is to uncover the behaviors that constitute the dark side of leadership, the impacts of these behaviors on employees and the employees’ reactions to these behaviors in Turkish context. The data were collected through structured face-to-face interviews, a focus group interview and observations and analyzed according to content analysis technique. Interviews were done with 9 and focus group interview was done with 4 participants. Observations were made in an open plan office. Participants were selected from researchers’ social network according to purposive sampling technique. At the end of the analyses, dark leadership was explained by themes of wearisome, narcissistic, insincere and tyrannous leader behaviors, impacts of dark leadership on employees were explained by themes of physiological and psychological effects and employees’ reactions to dark leadership were explained by themes of active and passive reactions. Findings were discussed in terms of their contributions to the management and organization literature and practical implications.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı iş yerinde liderliğin karanlık yüzünü oluşturan davranışların, bu davranışların çalışanlar üzerinde oluşturduğu etkilerin ve çalışanların bu davranışlara verdiği tepkilerin ne olduğunu ülkemiz bağlamında açığa çıkarmaktır. Araştırma verisi mülakat, odak grup görüşmesi ve gözlem yöntemleri kullanılarak toplanmış ve içerik analizi yöntemine uygun olarak analiz edilmiştir. Mülakatlar 9, odak grup görüşmesi ise 4 kişi ile yapılmıştır. Gözlem, açık ofis yerleşimli bir iş yerinde yapılmıştır. Katılımcılar araştırmacıların sosyal ağı içerisinden amaçlı örnekleme yöntemine göre belirlenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda karanlık liderliği oluşturan davranışlar; bezdirici, narsistik, samimiyetsiz ve zorbaca davranış temaları ile; karanlık liderliğin çalışanlar üzerindeki etkileri; psikolojik etkiler ve fizyolojik etkiler temaları ile, karanlık liderliğe verilen tepkiler ise; aktif tepkiler ve pasif tepkiler temaları ile açıklanmıştır. Araştırma bulguları yönetim ve organizasyon yazınına sağlanan katkılar ile uygulamaya dönük yansımaları açısından değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Başar, U., Sığrı, Ü., BASIM, N. (2016). Dark Leadership at the Workplace. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 65–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/164295

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ashforth, B. E. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755-778.
  2. Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 126-140.
  3. Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A.,Notelaers, G., Birkeland, M. & Einarsen, S. (2010). The Prevalence of Destructive Leadership Behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21, 438-452.
  4. Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F. & Walumba, F. O. (2004). Authentic leadership: Theory building for veritable sustained performance. Working paper: Gallup Leadership Institute, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
  5. Bass, B. M. & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.
  6. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J. & Atwater, L. (1996). The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45(1), 5–34.
  7. Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. İçinde J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Advances in organizational justice (ss. 89-118).
  8. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  9. Brown, M. E. & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.
  10. Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K. & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
  11. Çelebi, N., Güner H. & Yıldız V. (2015). Toksik liderlik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 249 – 268. Conger, J. A. (1990). The dark side of leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(2), 44-55.
  12. Glad, B. (2002). Why tyrants go too far: Malignant narcissism and absolute power. Political Psychology, 23(1), 1-37.
  13. Goldman, A. (2006). High toxicity leadership borderline personality disorder and the dysfunctional organization. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(8), 733-746.
  14. Goldman, A. (2011). Demagogue to dialogue: An alternative to toxic leadership in corporate downsizings. Organizational Dynamics, 40, 235-241.
  15. Gündüz, Y. & Dedekorkut, S. E. (2014). Yıkıcı liderlik. Mersin Üniversitesi