Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

A Multilevel Study of Relationships between Leaders’ Dark Triad and Employee Burnout: Mediating Role of Perceived Dark Leadership

Pages
2407–2423
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings – The findings indicated that there were significant relationships between perceived dark leadership and employee burnout, between leaders’ dark triad and perceived dark leadership, and between leaders’ dark triad and employee burnout.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – The aim of this research was to determine whether there are relationships between leaders’ dark triad and employee burnout and whether employees’ perception of dark leadership mediates these relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Design/methodology/approach – For this purpose, surveys were conducted in the Ankara, Istanbul, Izmir, Bursa, Samsun, Ordu, Antalya, Gaziantep, and Mugla provinces of Turkey in units of 12 different private security companies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings – The findings indicated that there were significant relationships between perceived dark leadership and employee burnout, between leaders’ dark triad and perceived dark leadership, and between leaders’ dark triad and employee burnout.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose – The aim of this research was to determine whether there are relationships between leaders’ dark triad and employee burnout and whether employees’ perception of dark leadership mediates these relationships. Design/methodology/approach – For this purpose, surveys were conducted in the Ankara, Istanbul, Izmir, Bursa, Samsun, Ordu, Antalya, Gaziantep, and Mugla provinces of Turkey in units of 12 different private security companies. The sample consisted of 116 leaders and 494 employees who reported to those leaders. Because the sample comprised two levels (i.e., individual and group levels), the data were analyzed through the hierarchical linear modeling technique. Findings – The findings indicated that there were significant relationships between perceived dark leadership and employee burnout, between leaders’ dark triad and perceived dark leadership, and between leaders’ dark triad and employee burnout. Additionally, perceived dark leadership mediated the relationships between leaders’ dark triad and employee burnout. Discussion – This research contributed to the theory by uncovering the mediating role of perceived dark leadership between dark personality traits of leaders and employee burnout. Additionally, significant relationships were discovered between research variables through multilevel analyses that resulted in more robust implications. Moreover, practitioners are able to improve managerial processes by paying attention to undesired consequences of dark leadership and leaders’ dark triad.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞAR, U. (2020). A Multilevel Study of Relationships between Leaders’ Dark Triad and Employee Burnout: Mediating Role of Perceived Dark Leadership. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 2407–2423. https://ajindex.com/articles/217615

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Akman, Y. (2016). The relationship between destructive leadership and job burnout: A research on teachers. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 12(3), 627-653.
  2. Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47(7): 755-778.
  3. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10-country comparison. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(1), 192-221.
  4. Babiak, P. & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
  5. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  6. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
  7. Başar, U., Sığrı, Ü., & Basım, N. (2016). İş yerinde karanlık liderlik. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 3(2), 65-76.
  8. Başar, U. & Basım, N. (2018). Paradoksal liderlik modeli. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 51(3), 121-153.
  9. Başar, U. (2019). Liderin karanlık kişilik özellikleri ile çalışanın tükenmişliği arasındaki ilişkide çalışanın karanlık liderlik algısının aracı rolü: Çok düzeyli bir araştırma (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Başkent University, Ankara,
  10. Turkey. Başar, U. (2020). İş yerinde karanlık liderlik algısı ölçeği. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 70-103.
  11. Bligh, M. C., Kohles, J. C., Pearce, C. L., Justin, J. E., & Stovall, J. F. (2007). When the romance is over: Follower perspectives of aversive leadership. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56(4), 528–557.
  12. Breso, E., Salanova, B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). In search of the “Third Dimension” of burnout: Efficacy or inefficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56(3), 460-478.
  13. Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117-134.
  14. Christie, R. & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  15. Cleckley, H. (1988). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). Augusta, GA: Emily S. Cleckley (Original work published in 1941).
  16. De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effective