Journals / Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 1

The Mediating Role of Country Brand Equity in the Effect of Country of Origin Image on Word of Mouth Marketing: A Study on Turkish TV Series in Morocco

Gizem Oğuz(AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5505-8769
Yusuf Karaca(AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2931-2289
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-03-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, a mediating role of country brand equity was found in this effect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkish TV series have recently become more widespread and popular in the international arena, especially in the Balkan and Middle Eastern countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Quantitative methods were used in the research and data was collected with a survey form obtained from 250 people using the easy sample method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, a mediating role of country brand equity was found in this effect.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Country of Origin · Country Brand Equity · Word of Mouth Marketing

Abstract

Turkish TV series have recently become more widespread and popular in the international arena, especially in the Balkan and Middle Eastern countries. Turkish TV series, which have a wide audience in the Arab geography, are met with great interest especially in the Kingdom of Morocco. Within the scope of this study, the reasons and tendencies of Moroccan people, who are among the audience of Turkish TV series, to watch Turkish TV series were investigated. In addition, the effect of country of origin image (COI) on country brand equity (CBE) and word-of-mouth marketing (WOM) was analyzed and the mediating role of country brand equity in this effect was examined. In the context of literature, the historical development of the Turkish TV series sector is discussed by touching on the historical relationship between Türkiye and Morocco, and the similarities in terms of culture and belief. The study was carried out in the cities of Casablanca, Fez, Marrakesh and Meknes, which are among the most populous cities of the Kingdom of Morocco. Quantitative methods were used in the research and data was collected with a survey form obtained from 250 people using the easy sample method. Among the data obtained in the study, demographic characteristics, perspectives on Turkish TV series, reasons for watching TV series, criticisms about TV series, desire to buy products in TV series and perspectives on Türkiye were analyzed using frequency analysis using SPSS program. The effect of COI on WOM and the mediating role of country brand equity in this effect were analyzed by measurement and structural model with the help of SmartPLS 4.0 program. As a result of the study, it was seen that the COI had a statistically significant effect on brand equity and WOM. In addition, a mediating role of country brand equity was found in this effect.

Özet

Turkish TV series have recently become more widespread and popular in the international arena, especially in the Balkan and Middle Eastern countries. Turkish TV series, which have a wide audience in the Arab geography, are met with great interest especially in the Kingdom of Morocco. Within the scope of this study, the reasons and tendencies of Moroccan people, who are among the audience of Turkish TV series, to watch Turkish TV series were investigated. In addition, the effect of country of origin image (COI) on country brand equity (CBE) and word-of-mouth marketing (WOM) was analyzed and the mediating role of country brand equity in this effect was examined. In the context of literature, the historical development of the Turkish TV series sector is discussed by touching on the historical relationship between Türkiye and Morocco, and the similarities in terms of culture and belief. The study was carried out in the cities of Casablanca, Fez, Marrakesh and Meknes, which are among the most populous cities of the Kingdom of Morocco. Quantitative methods were used in the research and data was collected with a survey form obtained from 250 people using the easy sample method. Among the data obtained in the study, demographic characteristics, perspectives on Turkish TV series, reasons for watching TV series, criticisms about TV series, desire to buy products in TV series and perspectives on Türkiye were analyzed using frequency analysis using SPSS program. The effect of COI on WOM and the mediating role of country brand equity in this effect were analyzed by measurement and structural model with the help of SmartPLS 4.0 program. As a result of the study, it was seen that the COI had a statistically significant effect on brand equity and WOM. In addition, a mediating role of country brand equity was found in this effect.

🔖

Cite This Article

Oğuz, G., Karaca, Y. (2025). The Mediating Role of Country Brand Equity in the Effect of Country of Origin Image on Word of Mouth Marketing: A Study on Turkish TV Series in Morocco. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Volume: 12 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1447209

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (101)

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitilazing on the value of a brand name. The Free Press.
  2. Ahmad, F., & Guzmán, F. (2021). Brand equity, online reviews, and message trust: The moderating role of persuasion knowledge. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(4), 549-564.
  3. Anholt, S. (2003). Branding places and nations, brands and branding. The Economist, Profile Book, 213-227.
  4. Armağan, E. A., & Gürsoy, Ö. (2011). Satın alma kararlarında tüketici etnosentrizmi ve menşe ülke etkisinin cetscale ölçeği ile değerlendirilmesi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 67-77.
  5. Bannister, J. P., & Saunders, J. A. (2001). Uk consumers' attitudes towards imports: The measurement of national stereotype image. European Journal of Marketing, 12, 562-570. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004982
  6. Başgöze, P., & Kazancı, Ş. (2014). Ürün yerleştirme ve reklama ilişkin tutumların satın alma eğilimi ve marka imajı üzerine etkileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.17065/huiibf.89390
  7. Berg, M. (2017). The importance of cultural proximity in the success of Turkish dramas. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3415-3430.
  8. Bose, S., Roy, S. K., Alwi, S. F. S., & Nguyen, B. (2020). Measuring customer-based place brand equity (CBPBE) from a public diplomacy perspective: Evidence from West Bengal. Journal of Business Research, 116, 734-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.059
  9. Bozkurt, S. (2008). Ürün yerleştirme stratejilerinin marka hatırlama üzerine etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma [Unpublished master's thesis]. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi.
  10. Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. Plenum.
  11. Cengiz, M. F., & Çakın, Ö. (2022). Fas Krallığı’nda türk dizileri üzerine nicel bir araştırma. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24, 15-33. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.1114911
  12. Chakraborty, U., & Bhat, S. (2018). The effects of credible online reviews on brand equity dimensions and its consequence on consumer behavior. Journal of Promotion Management, 24(1), 57-82.
  13. Chinen, K., & Sun, Y. (2011). Effects of country of origin on buying behavior: A study of the attitudes of United States consumers to Chinese brand automobiles. International Journal of Management, 28(2), 553-563.
  14. Chiu, S. Y., & Ho, J. S. Y. (2015). Local vs. global brands: Country-of-origin’s effect on consumer-based brand equity among status-seekers. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 7(3), 6.
  15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences. Erlbaum.
  16. Delorme, D. E., & Reid, L. N. (1999). Moviegoers' experiences and interpretations of brands in films revisited. Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1999.10673584
  17. Derbaix, C., & Vanhamme, J. (2003). Inducing word of mouth by eliciting surprise: A pilot investigation. Journal of Economic Psyshology, 24(4), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00157-5
  18. Djafer, D., & Adjıla, A. (2024). Impact of country of origin image on brand equity development in the mobile phone sector. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, 6(3), 6703.
  19. Doan, H. A., Thi, N. D., & Nguyen, N. D. (2024). Consideration of direct and indirect factors affect electronic word- of-mouth: The change of green product consumption in the capital of Vietnam. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(1), 5601-5620.
  20. Doğanay, M., & Aktaş, M. K. (2021). Türkiye’de televizyon dizisi sektörü. Öneri Dergisi, 16(56), 852-878. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.944236
  21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  22. Gallais, B., Gagnon, C., Forgues, G., Cote I., & Laberge L. (2017). Further evidence for the reliability and validity of the fatigue and daytime sleepiness scale. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 375, 23-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2017.01.032
  23. Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression and structural equation models. Statistical Associates Publishers.
  24. Goyette, I., Ricard, L., Bergeron, J., & Marticotte, F. (2010). E-wom scale: Word of mouth measurement scale for e-services context. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 27(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.129
  25. Gümüş, N. (2018). Türk dizilerindeki ürün yerleştirme uygulamalarına yönelik tüketici algılarının incelenmesi: Azerbaycan üzerinde bir araştırma. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(3), 415-440.
  26. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (Eighth Edition). Cengage Learning.
  27. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd Edition). Sage.
  28. Hair, J.F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd Edition). Sage.
  29. Halim, C., & Keni, K. (2021). The impact of country of origin, celebrity endorsement, and electronic “word of mouth (eWOM) towards purchase intention. Tenth International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management 2021, 493-499.
  30. Hancığaz, E., & Hülür, H. (2024). The role of Turkish TV series in the formation of perception about Türkiye and Turkish people: The cases of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Jordan and Kyrgyzstan. Ege Academic Review, 24(2), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1391570
  31. Hartline, M., & Jones, K. C. (1996). Employee performance cues in a hotel service environment: Influence on perceived service quality, value and word of mouth intentions. Journal of Business Research, 35(3), 207-216.
  32. Hasanawi, M. T., Rozy, F., Andayan, N., Ayu, S. M., & Syamsiah, W. S. (2024). The effect of country of origin, electronic word of mouth (eWOM) and brand trust on purchasing intention of Yamaha matic motorbikes in Bandung city. Tec Empresarial.
  33. Haubl, G., & Elrod, T. (1999). The impact of congruity between brand name and country of production on consumers’ product quality judgments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(3), 199-215.
  34. Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. (2016). Using pls path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116, 2-20.
  35. Jaffe, E. D., & Nebenzahl, I. D. (2006). National image and competitive advantage: The theory and practice of place branding. Copenhagen Business School Press.
  36. İzmir, O. (2016). Menşe ülke i̇majı, marka ve fiyatın ürün değerlendirme ve satın alma niyeti üzerindeki göreceli etkilerinin i̇ncelenmesi [Unpublished master’s thesis], Sakarya Üniversitesi.
  37. Kaptan, Y., & Algan, E. (2023). Guest editors’ introduction: Cultural politics and production practices of the Turkish TV industry. International Communication Gazette, 85(3-4), 266-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485231152864
  38. Karaca, Y. (2010). Tüketici satın alma karar sürecinde ağızdan ağıza pazarlama. Beta Yayınları.
  39. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252054
  40. Kim, C. K., & Chung, J. Y. (1997). Brand popularity, country image and market share: An empirical study.
  41. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 361-386. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490105
  42. Kim, R. B., & Chao, Y. (2018). The effect of country of origin on consumer-based brand equity (CBBE) of Colombian consumers: An empirical investigation of Samsung vs. Huawei brands. Journal of International Studies, 11(3), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-3/6
  43. Kim, S., & Yim, M. Y. C. (2022). Exploring consumers’ attitude formation toward their own brands when in crisis: Cross-national comparisons between USA and China. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06 2020-2968
  44. Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6(1), 47-48.
  45. Kırcova, İ., & Köse, Ş. G. (2017). Televizyon dizileri ve filmlerde ürün yerleştirmeye yönelik genç tüketicilerin tutumlarına ilişkin bir nitel araştırma. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(19), 51-78.
  46. Klein, J. G., Ettenson, R., & Morris, M. D. (1998). The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 89–100.
  47. Koçan, M., & Yıldız, S. (2020). Dizi sektöründe tüketim duyguları, memnuniyet, kulaktan kulağa iletişim ve sadakat arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 8(2), 765-784. https://doi.org/10.19145/e-gifder.718285
  48. Kotler, P., Haider, D. H., & Rein, I. (1993). Marketing places. The Free Press.
  49. Latif, R. A., Ranli, N. B., & Alauddin, A. N. M. (2019). Relationship between word of mouth (wom) communication and brand equity of sport products among consumers in kuantan, pahang. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management, 6(2), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijssm.v6i2.23545
  50. Lee, H., Chae, M.S., & Lew, Y.K. (2020), The application of categorization and stereotype content theories to country of origin image: Vietnamese perceptions towards Korean wave brands. Asia Pacific Business Review, 26(3), 336-361.
  51. Li, X., & Li, G. (2024). Place-of-origin or word-of-mouth for agriculture product in the online marketplace? An empirical investigation from Taobao.com. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4970652
  52. Lin, C. H., & Kao, D. T. (2004). The impacts of country-of-origin on brand equity. Journal of American Academy of Business, 5(1/2), 37-40.
  53. Lusk, J. L., Brown, J., Mark, T., Proseku, I., Thompson, R., & Welsh, J. (2006). Consumer behavior, public policy, and country-of-origin labeling. Review of Agricultural Economics, 28(2), 284-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9353.2006.00288
  54. Magnusson, P., Zdravkovic, S., & Westjohn, S.A. (2022). A longitudinal analysis of country image and brand
  55. origin effects. International Marketing Review, 39(4), 912-930.
  56. Mariutti, F. G., & Giraldi, J. (2020). Country brand equity: The role of image and reputation. Brazilian Administration Review, 17(3), e180128.
  57. Mohd Yasin, N., Mohd, Nasser. N., & Mohamad, O. (2007). Does image of country of origin matter to brand equity? Journal of Product and Brand Management, 16(1), 38-48.
  58. Mukerjee, K. (2018). The impact of brand experience, service quality and perceived value on word of mouth of retail bank customers: Investigating the mediating effect of loyalty. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 23(4), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-018-0039-8
  59. Murtiasih, S., Sucherly, S., & Siringoringo, H. (2014). Impact of country of origin and word of mouth on brand equity. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 32(5), 616-629. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-04_2013_0073
  60. Nagashima, A. (1970). A comparison of Japanese and US attitudes toward foreign products. Journal of Marketing, 34(1), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297003400115
  61. Nath Sanyal, S., & Datta, S. K. (2011). The effect of country of origin on brand equity: An empirical study on generic drugs. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 20(2), 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610421111121125
  62. Ngan, N. H., Thanh, T. B., Phuong, T. T. K., & Vinh, T. T. (2020). Impact of country-of-origin image on brand equity: A case study from the sportswear market in Vietnam. Asian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2(4), 1-17.
  63. Norouzi, A., & Hosienabadi, B. F. (2011). The effects of brand’s country-of-origin image on the formation of brand equity. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 766-770.
  64. Odabaşoğlu, Ş., Kılıç, A., & Teke, A. (2022). Marka değerinin ağızdan ağıza iletişim üzerindeki etkisi. International Journal of Management and Administration, 6(12), 218-237. https://doi.org/10.29064/ijma.1131553
  65. Oduro, S., De Nisco, A., & Petruzzellis, L. (2024). Country-of-origin image and consumer brand evaluation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 33(1), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM- 01-2023-4328
  66. Ökmen, Y. E., & Göksu, O. (2019). Kültürel diplomasisi bağlamında türk dizilerinin i̇hracatı ve kültür aktarımına
  67. katkısı: ‘Diriliş Ertuğrul’ örneği. Kamu Diplomasisinde Yeni Yönelimler, Literatürk Academia, 247–291.
  68. Özarslan, K. (2020). Ülke markalaması bağlamında uluslararası basında Türk dizileri ve Türkiye imajı. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(1), 215-238.
  69. Öztürk, M., & Atik, A. (2016). Ulusal pazardan küresel pazarlara uzanan süreçte türk dizilerinin gelişimi. Maltepe Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 66-82.
  70. Panda, R. K., & Misra, S. (2014). Impact of country-of-origin image on brand equity: A study on durable products in India. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 494-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.062
  71. Papadopoulos, N., & Heslop, L. A. (2003). Country equity and product-country images: State of the art in research and implications, S. C. (Ed.), Handbook of Research in International Marketing, Elgar, 402-433.
  72. Pappu, R., & Quester, P. (2010). Country equity: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. International Business Review, 19(3), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.12.006
  73. Pappu, R., Quester, P. G., & Cooksey, W. R. (2006). Consumer – based brand equity and country of origin relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 40(5/6), 696-717.
  74. Pappu, R., Quester, P. G., & Cooksey, R. W. (2007). Country image and consumer-based brand equity: Relationships and implications for international marketing. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 726-745.
  75. Paswan, A., Kulkarni, S., & Ganesh, G. (2003). Nation branding loyalty towards the country, the state, and the service brands. Journal of Brand Management, 10, 233-251.
  76. Parkvithee, N., & Miranda, M. J. (2012). The interaction of country of origin brand equity and purchase involvement on consumer purchase intentions of clothing labels. Asia Pasific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 24(1), 7-22.
  77. Petra, K., & Diamantopoulos, Z. A. (2008). Home country image, country brand equity and consumers’ product preferences: An empirical study. Management International Review, 48(5), 578-602.
  78. Sakallı, E. (2014). Türkçe popüler kültür. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (Teke) Dergisi, 3(2), 307-317.
  79. Saydan, R. (2013). Relationship between country of origin image and brand equity: Empirical evidence in the English market. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(3), 78-88.
  80. Şentürk, R., Gülçur, A. S., & Eken, İ. (2017). Türkiye’de film endüstrisi. İstanbul Ticaret Odası ve İstanbul Düşünce Akademisi.
  81. Seo, E.-J., & Park, J.-W. (2018). A study on the effects of social media marketing activities on brand equity and customer response in the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 66, 36-41.
  82. Septyanti, A., & Hananto, A. (2017). Country of origin image and brand equity from gender perspective: Do they matter? Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, 6, 89-106.
  83. Shahin, A., Kazemi, A., & Mahyari, H. K. (2012). How consumer’s perception of country of origin affects brand equity: A case study in Iran. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 12(6), 878-885.
  84. Shimp, T. A. (1984). Consumer ethnocentrism the concept and a preliminary empirical test. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 285-29.
  85. Sofiane, L. (2019). The impact of consumer-based brand equity on word of mouth behavior. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 10(4), 75-85.
  86. Straubhaar, J. (1991). Beyond media imperialism: Asymmetrical interdependence and cultural proximity. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 8(1), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039109366779
  87. Sucu, İ. (2011). Farklı yaşam tarzlarında geleneksel ve modern anlayışının televizyon dizilerine yansıması. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 23(24), 125-146.
  88. Taylor, D. G., Strutton, D., & Thompson, K. (2012). Self-enhancement as a motivation for sharing online advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(2), 28.
  89. Uğurlu, H. (2018). The differences in creating rhythm in tv series. Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(4), 82- 89.
  90. Ural, T., & Perk, H. G. (2012). Tüketici temelli marka değerinin kişisel bilgisayar satın alma niyeti üzerine etkisi: Antakya’da bir çalışma. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(3), 11-26.
  91. Urmak, T. T., & Dayanç Kıyat, G. (2021). Marka imajının elektronik ağızdan ağıza pazarlama (eeap) üzerindeki etkisi: Notebook kullanıcıları üzerine bir araştırma. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(40), 505-524. https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.824941
  92. Veloutsou, C., Christodoulides, G., & De Chernatony, L. (2013). A taxonomy of measures for consumer‐ based brand equity: Drawing on the views of managers in Europe. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(3), 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-02-2013-0256
  93. Verlegh, P. W. J., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1999). A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 521–546.
  94. Yazgan, H., Çatı, K., & Kethüda, Ö. (2014). Tüketici temelli marka değerinin ağızdan ağza pazarlamaya etkisi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 237-252.
  95. Yıldırım, M. (2018). Yarışma programlarında ürün yerleştirme uygulamaları ve marka hatırlanırlığına etkisi: Survivor 2017 Ünlüler Gönüllüler analizi [Unpublished master’s thesis], İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi.
  96. Yıldız, B. (2017). Güçlü bir ülke markası oluşturma: Türkiye örneği. [Unpublished master’s thesis], Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi.
  97. Yıldız, E. (2021). Smartpls ile yapısal eşitlik modelleme: Reflektif ve formatif yapılar. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  98. Yılmaz E. G., & Yılmaz, Y. (2010). Türkiye ve ortadoğu ülkeleri arasında kültürel yakınlaşma aracı olarak popüler kültür ürünleri üzerine bir değerlendirme. Arap-Türk Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi Seçme Tebliğler, 301-328, Ankara.
  99. Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 1-14.
  100. Zeugner-Roth, K. P., Diamantopoulos, A., & Montesinos, Á. (2008). Home country image, country brand equity and consumers’ product preferences: An empirical study. MIR: Management International Review, 48(5), 577–602.
  101. Zhao, X, Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research Inc., 37(2), 197-206.