SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 3

Take Back Control: Explaining the Rise of Populist Sovereigntism Through the Legitimacy Crisis of the Liberal International Order

Cihan Uzunçayır(Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi)0000-0002-0734-4303
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It claims that there is an intersection between the legitimacy crisis of the LIO and the rise of populist sovereigntism, emphasizing the need for their joint assessment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study relates the recent rise of populist sovereigntism to the legitimacy crisis of the liberal international order (LIO).
📊
Key Findings & Data:It examines the LIO constructed after World War II based on three fundamental pillars of political, economic, and intergovernmental liberalism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It claims that there is an intersection between the legitimacy crisis of the LIO and the rise of populist sovereigntism, emphasizing the need for their joint assessment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Populism · Populist Sovereigntism · Liberal International order

Abstract

This study relates the recent rise of populist sovereigntism to the legitimacy crisis of the liberal international order (LIO). It examines the LIO constructed after World War II based on three fundamental pillars of political, economic, and intergovernmental liberalism. It argues that a transformation occurred in all three pillars of the LIO during the post-Cold War period. It further asserts that the legitimacy-generating functioning of the LIO, established after World War II, has encountered a crisis with the transformation in the post-national liberal era. It claims that there is an intersection between the legitimacy crisis of the LIO and the rise of populist sovereigntism, emphasizing the need for their joint assessment.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uzunçayır, C. (2025). Take Back Control: Explaining the Rise of Populist Sovereigntism Through the Legitimacy Crisis of the Liberal International Order. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Volume: 12 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1560384

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (67)

  1. Adler-Nissen, R., & Zarakol, A. (2021). Struggles for recognition: The liberal international order and the merger of its discontents. International Organization, 75(2), 611-634. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000454
  2. Agnew, J. (2019). Soli al mondo: The recourse to "sovereigntism" in contemporary Italian populism. California Italian Studies, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/C391042454
  3. Aydın-Düzgit, S. (2023). Authoritarian middle powers and the liberal order: Turkey's contestation of the EU. International Affairs, 99(6), 2319-2337. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad225
  4. Balfour, R. (2016). Europe's troublemakers: The populist challenge to foreign policy. European Policy Center.
  5. Basile, L., & Mazzoleni, O. (2020). Sovereignist wine in populist bottles? An introduction. European Politics and Society, 21(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1632576
  6. Bearce, D. H., & Jolliff Scott, B. J. (2019). Popular non-support for international organizations: How extensive and what does this represent? The Review of International Organizations, 14(2), 187-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09351-3
  7. Bell, D. (Ed.). (2002). The radical right (3rd ed). Transaction Publishers.
  8. Bornschier, S., & Kriesi, H. (2013). The populist right, the working class, and the changing face of class politics. In J. Rydgren (Ed.), Class Politics and the Radical Right. Routledge.
  9. B￶rzel, T. A., & Zrn, M. (2021). Contestations of the liberal international order: From liberal multilateralism to postnational liberalism. International Organization, 75(2), 282-305. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000570
  10. Brubaker, R. (2020). Populism and nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 26(1), 44-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12522
  11. Casaglia, A., Coletti, R., Lizotte, C., Agnew, J., Mamadouh, V., & Minca, C. (2020). Interventions on European nationalist populism and bordering in time of emergencies. Political Geography, 82, 102238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102238
  12. Chryssogelos, A. (2017). Populism in foreign policy. In C. G. Thies (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.467
  13. Chryssogelos, A. (2020). State transformation and populism: From the internationalized to the neo sovereign state? Politics, 40(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395718803830
  14. Cooley, A., & Nexon, D. H. (2021, March). The illiberal tide: Why the international order is tilting toward autocracy. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-03-26/illiberal-tide
  15. Copelovitch, M., & Pevehouse, J. C. W. (2019). International organizations in a new era of populist nationalism. The Review of International Organizations, 14(2), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-093531
  16. De Spiegeleire, S., Skinner, C., & Sweijs, T. (2017). The rise of populist sovereignism. Hague Centre for Strategic Studies; JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep12603.1
  17. De Vries, C. E., Hobolt, S. B., & Walter, S. (2021). Politicizing international cooperation: The mass public, political entrepreneurs, and political opportunity structures. International Organization, 75(2), 306-332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000491
  18. Destradi, S., & Plagemann, J. (2019). Populism and international relations: (Un)predictability, personalisation, and the reinforcement of existing trends in world politics. Review of International Studies, 45(5), 711-730. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210519000184
  19. Erdog￰an, R. T. (2021). Daha adil bir dnya mmkn: Birle￾mi￾ Milletler reformu i￧in bir model ￶nerisi. Turkuvaz Kitap.
  20. Ettinger, A. (2020). Principled realism and populist sovereignty in Trump's foreign policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33(3), 410-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1659229
  21. Gerbaudo, P. (2021). The great recoil: Politics after populism and pandemic (First ed). Verso. Habertürk. (2021, January 17). Mehmet U￧um: Milli yarg� yetkisi devredilemez. Habertrk. https://www.haberturk.com/mehmet-ucum-milli-yargi-yetkisi-devredilemez-2940869
  22. Hisarlıo￰ğlu, F., Yanık, L. K., Korkut, U., & Civeleko￰lu, ￝. (2022). Contesting the "corrupt elites," creating the "pure people," and renegotiating the hierarchies of the international order? Populism and foreign policy-making in Turkey and Hungary. International Studies Review, 24(1), viab052. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab052
  23. Hooghe, L., Lenz, T., & Marks, G. (2019). Contested world order: The delegitimation of international governance. The Review of International Organizations, 14(4), 731-743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9334-3
  24. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(01), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
  25. Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241
  26. Ikenberry, G. J. (2020). A world safe for democracy: Liberal internationalism and the crises of global order. Yale University Press.
  27. Inglehart, R. (2018, June). The age of insecurity can democracy save itself? Foreign Affairs, 97(3), 20-28.
  28. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. RPW 16-026.
  29. Jenne, E. K. (2021). Populism, nationalism and revisionist foreign policy. International Affairs, 97(2), 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa230
  30. Kallis, A. (2018). Populism, sovereigntism, and the unlikely re-emergence of the territorial nation-state. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3), 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-018-0233-z
  31. Kaltwasser, C. R. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: Threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19(2), 184-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572619
  32. Kreuder-Sonnen, C., & Rittberger, B. (2020). The LIOn's share: How the liberal international order contributes to its own legitimacy crisis [Working Paper]. Harvard CES Open Forum Series 2019-2020. http://aei.pitt.edu/102732/
  33. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge University Press.
  34. Kyle, J., & Gultchin, L. (2018). Populism in power around the world. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3283962
  35. Lake, D. A., Martin, L. L., & Risse, T. (2021). Challenges to the liberal order: Reflections on international organization. International Organization, 75(2), 225-257. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000636
  36. Lochocki, T. (2018). The rise of populism in western Europe. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62855-4
  37. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order, International Security, 43(4), 7-50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342
  38. Milanovi?, B. (2018). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization (First Harvard University Press). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  39. Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
  40. Mounk, Y. (2018). The undemocratic dilemma. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0030
  41. Mounk, Y. (2021). Demokrasinin halkla imtihan�: Liberal demokrasinin krizi, otoriter poplizmin ykseli￾i (￝. ￖzekmek￧i, Trans.). H2O Kitap.
  42. Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135
  43. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
  44. Mudde, C. (2021). Populism in Europe: An illiberal democratic response to undemocratic liberalism. Government and Opposition, 56(4), 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.15
  45. Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
  46. Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies. 51(13), 1667-1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018789490
  47. Mller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812293784
  48. Niblett, R. (2017). Liberalism in retreat: The demise of a dream. Foreign Affairs, 96(1), 17-25.
  49. Pappas, T. S. (2014). Populist democracies: Post-authoritarian Greece and post-communist Hungary. Government and Opposition, 49(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.21
  50. Pappas, T. S. (2023). Populism as democratic illiberalism. In M. Laruelle (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Illiberalism (1st ed., pp. 95-108). Oxford University Press.
  51. Patman, R. G. (2019). The liberal international order and its populist adversaries in Russia, UK and USA. In F. A. Stengel, D. B. MacDonald, & D. Nabers (Eds.), Populism and World Politics (pp. 277-303). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04621-7_11
  52. Posner, E. A. (2017). Liberal internationalism and the populist backlash. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2898357
  53. Posner, E. A., & Weyl, E. G. (2018). Radical markets: Uprooting capitalism and democracy for a just society. Princeton University Press.
  54. Power, S. (2013). "A problem from hell": America and the age of genocide. Basic Books. Pradhan, R., & Sing, A. (2024). Humanitarian intervention in Syria: A critical analysis. International Studies, 61(1), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208817241228385
  55. Rodrik, D. (2021). Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, culture, and the rise of right wing populism. Annual Review of Economics, 13(1), 133-170. https://doi.org/10.1146/annureeconomics-070220-032416
  56. Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379-415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993
  57. Saul, B. (2022, June 25). The law of the jungle: Western hypocrisy over the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Australian Book Review. https://www.australianbookreview.com.au/979-july-202no-444/9296/the-law-of-the-jungle-western-hypocrisy-over-the-russian-invasion-of-ukraineby-ben-saul
  58. Sel￧uk, O. (2024). The authoritarian divide: Populism, propaganda, and polarization. University of Notre Dame Press.
  59. Simma, B. (1999). NATO, the UN and the use of force: Legal aspects. European Journal of International Law, 10(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/10.1.1
  60. Sputnik. (2023, September 16). AP raporuna AK Partili Usta'dan tepki: "AP'nin Trkiye'nin i￧i￾lerine kar�￾ma yetkisi yok." Sputnik Trkiye. https://anlatilaninotesi.com.tr/20230916/ap-raporuna-ak-partili-ustadan-tepki-apnin-turkiyenin-icislerine-karisma-yetkisi-yok-1075517473.html
  61. Stavrakakis, Y. (2015). Populism in power: Syriza's challenge to Europe. Juncture, 21(4), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2050-5876.2015.00817.x
  62. Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119-142.
  63. Streeck, W. (2018). Taking back control? The future of western democratic capitalism. Efil Journal of Economic Research, 1(3), 30-48.
  64. Vinjamuri, L., Ayd�n Dzgit, S., Bajpaee, C., Cooley, A., De Hoop Scheffer, A., Emmers, R., Fravel, M. T., Lind, J., Nasr, V., Quencez, M., Stelzenmller, C., Vakil, S., & Zarakol, A. (2025). Competing visions for international order: Responses to US power in a fracturing world. Royal Institute of International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.55317/9781784136383
  65. Wallerstein, I. (1976). Semi-peripheral countries and the contemporary world crisis. Theory an Society, 3(4), 461-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161293
  66. Weyland, K. (2020). Populism's threat to democracy: Comparative lessons for the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 18(2), 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719003955
  67. World Bank. (2018, September 19). Decline of global extreme poverty continues but has slowed. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2018/09/19/decline-of-global-extreme-poverty-continues-but-has-slowed-world-bank