SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

The Effect of Employee Recognition by The Leader on Innovative Work Behaviors: Psychological Safety and Employee Improvisation as Sequential Mediators

Remzi Gürer Gerçek(KOCAELI UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5844-880X
Öznur Gökkaya(KOCAELI UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-6290-8098
Merve Gerçek(KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HEREKE ÖMER İSMET UZUNYOL MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0002-7076-8192
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, psychological safety and employee improvisation play a sequential mediating role in the relationship between recognition and innovative behaviors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The growing significance of innovation in dynamic work contexts has intensified discussions over the organizational and individual factors that influence it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Employee recognition, which refers to positive feedback regarding an employee’s contributions and performance, is influential in creating a psychologically safe environment where employees can propose valuable ideas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, psychological safety and employee improvisation play a sequential mediating role in the relationship between recognition and innovative behaviors.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Employee Recognition · Psychological Safety · Employee Improvisation

Abstract

The growing significance of innovation in dynamic work contexts has intensified discussions over the organizational and individual factors that influence it. Employee recognition, which refers to positive feedback regarding an employee’s contributions and performance, is influential in creating a psychologically safe environment where employees can propose valuable ideas. Furthermore, evidence suggests that psychological safety enhances employee improvisation, which involves risk-taking and diverging from established routines in response to unforeseen circumstances. Although various studies have examined the effects of leadership on innovative behaviors and the role of psychological safety in this relationship, employee recognition by the leader remains overlooked. This study examines the sequential mediating roles of psychological safety and employee improvisation in the effect of employee recognition by the leader on innovative work behaviors. The sample consists of 314 employees from Türkiye, with 43% female and 57% male participants, and 55% working in the public sector and 45% in the private sector. The research hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling. The findings demonstrate that employee recognition has positive links to both psychological safety and employee improvisation. Also, psychological safety and employee improvisation play a sequential mediating role in the relationship between recognition and innovative behaviors.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gerçek, R. G., Gökkaya, Ö., Gerçek, M. (2026). The Effect of Employee Recognition by The Leader on Innovative Work Behaviors: Psychological Safety and Employee Improvisation as Sequential Mediators. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1704816

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (75)

  1. Afsar, B., F. Badir, Y., & Bin Saeed, B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(8), 1270-1300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2014-0152
  2. Agarwal, P., & Farndale, E. (2017). High‐performance work systems and creativity implementation: The role of psychological capital and psychological safety. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(3), 440-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12148
  3. Ahmad, I., Gao, Y., Su, F., & Khan, M. K. (2023). Linking ethical leadership to followers' innovative work behavior in Pakistan: The vital roles of psychological safety and proactive personality. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(3), 755-772. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2020-0464
  4. Ampofo, E. T., Karatepe, O. M., Mensah, I., & Wilberforce, M. T. (2023). The effect of employee recognition on restaurant employees’ job embeddedness, knowledge sharing and service orientation: Abusive supervision as a moderator. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(10), 3612-3637. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2022-0036
  5. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
  6. Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (2003). Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 569-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x
  7. Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 45-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100104
  8. Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475- 682X.1964.tb00583.x
  9. Bradler, C., Dur, R., Neckermann, S., & Non, A. (2016). Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. Management Science, 62(11), 3085-3099. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2291
  10. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
  11. Brun, J. P., & Dugas, N. (2008). An analysis of employee recognition: Perspectives on human resources practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 716–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190801953723
  12. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
  13. Chen, J., Zheng, W., & Jiang, B. (2022). The impact of moral leadership on physical education teachers’ innovation behavior: The role of identification with leader and psychological safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1030245.
  14. Chen, Y., Liu, D., Tang, G., & Hogan, T. M. (2021). Workplace events and employee creativity: A multistudy field investigation. Personnel Psychology, 74(2), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030245
  15. Chiu, C. Y. C., Owens, B. P., & Tesluk, P. E. (2016). Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams: The role of leader humility, team proactive personality, and team performance capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(12), 1705. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000159
  16. Coetzer, A., Inma, C., Poisat, P., Redmond, J., & Standing, C. (2018). Job embeddedness and employee enactment of innovation-related work behaviours. International Journal of Manpower, 39(2), 222-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2016-0095
  17. Coutifaris, C. G., & Grant, A. M. (2022). Taking your team behind the curtain: The effects of leader feedback- sharing and feedback-seeking on team psychological safety. Organization Science, 33(4), 1574-1598. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1498
  18. Crossan, M. M., & Sorrenti, M. (1997). Making sense of improvisation. In J. Walsh & A. Huff (Eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, 14, (pp 155-180). Routledge.
  19. Cunha, M. P. E., Kamoche, K., & Cunha, R. C. E. (2003). Organizational improvisation and leadership-a field study in two computer-mediated settings. International Studies of Management & Organization, 33(1), 34-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2003.11043677
  20. De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710720546
  21. De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation. EIM Business and Policy Research, 8(1), 1-27.
  22. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
  23. DiLiello, T. C., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Maximizing organizational leadership capacity for the future: Toward a model of self‐leadership, innovation and creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663114
  24. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
  25. Edmondson, A. C., & Bransby, D. P. (2023). Psychological safety comes of age: Observed themes in an established literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217
  26. Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23– 43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
  27. El-Kassar, A. N., Dagher, G. K., Lythreatis, S., & Azakir, M. (2022). Antecedents and consequences of knowledge hiding: The roles of HR practices, organizational support for creativity, creativity, innovative work behavior, and task performance. Journal of Business Research, 140, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.079
  28. Elsayed, A. M., Zhao, B., Goda, A. E. M., & Elsetouhi, A. M. (2023). The role of error risk taking and perceived organizational innovation climate in the relationship between perceived psychological safety and innovative work behavior: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1042911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1042911
  29. Fisher, C. M., & Barrett, F. J. (2019). The experience of improvising in organizations: A creative process perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(2), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0100
  30. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  31. Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta‐ analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183
  32. Frey, B. S. (2006). Giving and receiving awards. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00022.x
  33. Gerçek, M. (2023). The impact of organizational empowerment on contextual and adaptive performance:
  34. The mediating role of innovative work behavior. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 19(2), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1240152
  35. Gong, Y., Cheung, S. Y., Wang, M., & Huang, J. C. (2012). Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: Integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1611-1633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380250
  36. Hadida, A. L., Tarvainen, W., & Rose, J. (2015). Organizational improvisation: A consolidating review and framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 437-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12047
  37. Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, And the Arts, 5(1), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556
  38. Hawass, H. H. (2017). Employee feedback orientation: A paternalistic leadership perspective. Management Research Review, 40(12), 1238-1260. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-12-2016-0295
  39. Javed, B., Naqvi, S. M. M. R., Khan, A. K., Arjoon, S., & Tayyeb, H. H. (2019). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(1), 117- 136. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.3
  40. Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 785-804. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.571
  41. Kwarteng, S., Frimpong, S. O., Asare, R., & Wiredu, T. J. N. (2024). Effect of employee recognition, employee engagement on their productivity: the role of transformational leadership style at Ghana health service. Current Psychology, 43(6), 5502-5513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04708-9
  42. Li, A. N., & Tan, H. H. (2012). What happens when you trust your supervisor? Mediators of individual performance in trust relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1812
  43. Li, T., & Tang, N. (2022). Inclusive leadership and innovative performance: A multi-level mediation model of psychological safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 934831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934831
  44. Liehr, J., & Hauff, S. (2024). Promoting employees’ innovative work behavior through innovation-specific leader behavior: An AMO-approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2024.57
  45. Liu, J., Zhou, X., & Wang, Q. (2023). The influence of entrepreneurial leadership on employee improvisation in new ventures: based on cognitive-affective processing system framework. Kybernetes, 52(9), 3566-3587. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2021-0933
  46. Long, R. J., & Shields, J. L. (2010). From pay to praise? Non-cash employee recognition in Canadian and Australian firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1145–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2010.483840
  47. Luthans, K. (2000). Recognition: A powerful, but often overlooked, leadership tool to improve employee performance. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190000700104
  48. May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
  49. Merino, D. M., & Privado, J. (2015). Does employee recognition affect positive psychological functioning and well-being? Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.67
  50. Migneault, P., Rousseau, V., & Boudrias, J. S. (2009). The influence of work climate components on individual’s empowerment. European Review of Applied Psychology, 59, 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2009.02.001
  51. Mikkelsen, M. F., Jacobsen, C. B., & Andersen, L. B. (2017). Managing employee motivation: Exploring the connections between managers’ enforcement actions, employee perceptions, and employee intrinsic motivation. International Public Management Journal, 20(2), 183-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1043166
  52. Montani, F., Boudrias, J. S., & Pigeon, M. (2020). Employee recognition, meaningfulness and behavioural involvement: Test of a moderated mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(3), 356-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1288153
  53. Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001
  54. Nisula, A. M., & Kianto, A. (2016). The role of knowledge management practices in supporting employee capacity for improvisation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(17), 1920-1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1088885
  55. Phung, V. D., Hawryszkiewycz, I., & Chandran, D. (2019). How knowledge sharing leads to innovative work behaviour: A moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 21(3), 277-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-11-2018-0148
  56. Rai, A., Ghosh, P., Chauhan, R., & Singh, R. (2018). Improving in-role and extra-role performances with rewards and recognition: does engagement mediate the process? Management Research Review, 41(8), 902-919. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-12-2016-0280
  57. Rai, S. (2004). Motivational theories and incentives approaches. IIMB Management Review, 16(4), 43-50.
  58. Rao Jada, U., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Titiyal, R. (2019). Empowering leadership and innovative work behavior: A moderated mediation examination. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 915-930. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2018-0533
  59. Rehman, W. U., Ahmad, M., Allen, M. M., Raziq, M. M., & Riaz, A. (2019). High involvement HR systems and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment, and the moderating roles of manager and co-worker support. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(4), 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1614563
  60. Saunderson, R. (2004). Survey findings of the effectiveness of employee recognition in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 33(3), 255-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600403300302
  61. Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004
  62. Stajkovic, A., & Luthans, F. (2003). Behavioral management and task performance in organizations: Conceptual background, meta-analysis, and test of alternative models. Personnel Psychology, 56, 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00147.x
  63. Su, X., Jiang, X., Lin, W., Xu, A., & Zheng, Q. (2022). Organizational innovative climate and employees’ improvisational behavior: The mediating role of Psychological Safety and the moderating role of creative self-efficacy. Sage Open, 12(4), 21582440221132526. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221132526
  64. Sun, L., Huang, C., Wu, Z., & Li, C. (2023). How does humble leadership influence employee improvisation? A motivational perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02499-9
  65. Tetrick, L. E., & Haimann, C. R. (2014). Employee recognition. In Ed(s). Kelloway, K., Day, A. &, Hurrel, J.J. Workplace well‐being: How to build psychologically healthy workplaces (pp. 161-174), Wiley.
  66. Van Woerkom, M., & Meyers, M. C. (2019). Strengthening personal growth: The effects of a strengths intervention on personal growth initiative. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(1), 98- 121. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12240
  67. Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 16(3), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0126
  68. Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275– 1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015848
  69. Wang, H., Chen, M., & Li, X. (2021a). Moderating multiple mediation model of the impact of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 666477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666477
  70. Wang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2021b). Promoting innovative behavior in employees: The mechanism of leader psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 598090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598090
  71. Wihuda, F., Kurniawan, A. A., Kusumah, A. I., & Adawiyah, W. R. (2017). Linking empowering leadership to employee service innovative behavior: A study from the hotel industry. Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 65(3), 294-313.
  72. Xu, Z., & Suntrayuth, S. (2022). Innovative work behavior in high-tech enterprises: Chain intermediary effect of psychological safety and knowledge sharing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1017121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017121
  73. Yang, T., & Jiang, X. (2023). When colleague got recognized: Third-party’s reaction to witnessing employee recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 968782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.968782
  74. Zhang, H., Xiao, H., Wang, Y., Shareef, M. A., Akram, M. S., & Goraya, M. A. S. (2021). An integration of antecedents and outcomes of business model innovation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Research, 131, 803- 814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.045
  75. Zhu, J., Yao, J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Linking empowering leadership to innovative behavior in professional learning communities: The role of psychological empowerment and team psychological safety. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 657-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09584-2