Journals / Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 3

Political Socialization Among Young People Aged 15–29 in Türkiye: A Quantitative Analysis of an Online Sample

Ahmet Ali Ugan(IĞDIR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER YÜKSEKOKULU, HALKLA İLİŞKİLER VE REKLAMCILIK BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-9264-2673
Yeter Solak(OSMANIYE KORKUT ATA UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8141-113X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed significant differences in political socialization levels according to gender, age, place of residence, employment status, and income level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine the levels of political socialization among young people in Türkiye and to examine differences in political socialization according to selected sociodemographic characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted within the framework of a quantitative research design and included 536 participants aged 15–29 recruited through voluntary online non-probability sampling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed significant differences in political socialization levels according to gender, age, place of residence, employment status, and income level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Political Socialization · Youth · Family

Abstract

This study aims to determine the levels of political socialization among young people in Türkiye and to examine differences in political socialization according to selected sociodemographic characteristics. The research was conducted within the framework of a quantitative research design and included 536 participants aged 15–29 recruited through voluntary online non-probability sampling. Data were collected using the Political Socialization Scale (PSS), which comprises family, friend, and media dimensions. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine the fit of the proposed factor structure in the present sample. To test the research hypotheses, independent-samples t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to examine differences in political socialization levels according to gender, age, place of residence, employment status, and income level. In addition, the Classification and Regression Trees (CART) algorithm was employed to descriptively examine how total political socialization scores were partitioned according to different combinations of the family, friend, and media subdimensions. The findings revealed significant differences in political socialization levels according to gender, age, place of residence, employment status, and income level. The CART analysis showed that the first split in the regression tree occurred according to the friend dimension, followed by subsequent partitions based on the family and media dimensions. These findings describe the classification structure of political socialization scores within the observed sample and should not be interpreted as indicating independent explanatory or causal relationships among the subdimensions. Because the study was based on voluntary online non-probability sampling and a cross-sectional research design, the findings cannot be generalized to the entire young population of Türkiye, nor do they permit causal inferences. Within these limitations, the study provides descriptive findings on political socialization levels among young people in Türkiye, differences according to selected sociodemographic characteristics, and the multidimensional structure of political socialization as reflected in the family, friend, and media dimensions.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ugan, A. A., Solak, Y., Aydar, Ö. (2026). Political Socialization Among Young People Aged 15–29 in Türkiye: A Quantitative Analysis of an Online Sample. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Volume: 13 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1911690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akın, M. H. (2009). Siyasal toplumsallaşma sürecinde gençlik-teorik ve uygulamalı bir çalışma [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Selçuk Üniversitesi.
  2. Alkan, T. (1978). Demokrasinin denetim mekanizması ve siyasal toplumsallaşması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 33(1), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000001331
  3. Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press.
  4. Asma, A. (2019). Toplumsallaşma kurumlarının yükseköğretim öğrencilerinin siyasal toplumsallaşmasına etkisi [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi.
  5. Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International Group.
  6. Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press.
  7. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics: International edition. Pearson Education Limited.
  8. Tosun, A. (2025). Bireylerin siyasal toplumsallaşmasında aile ilişkilerinin etkisi: Kesitsel bir çalışma. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 27(50), 1187–1209. https://doi.org/10.18493/kmusekad.1538380
  9. Türkmenoğlu, A.T. (2017). Siyasal toplumsallaşma ve medya (üniversite öğrencileri üzerine teorik ve uygulamalı bir çalışma) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Selçuk Üniversitesi.
  10. Van Ditmars, M. M. (2023). Political socialization, political gender gaps, and the intergenerational transmission of left-right ideology. European Journal of Political Research, 62, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12517
  11. Yılmaz, E., & Karakoç, R. (2026). Siyasal katılım çalışmalarında bibliyometrik yaklaşım. Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 9(8), 444–464. https://doi.org/10.26677/TR1010.2026.1673