Journals / Textile and Apparel / 2026 / Volume: 29 Issue: 3

THE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF GEOTEXTILE MATERIALS USED FOR IRRIGATION WATER AND WEED CONTROL IN STONE GARDEN LANDSCAPE DESIGN

Handan Çakar(EGE UNIVERSITY, BAYINDIR VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0001-7209-5545
Özlem Akat Saraçoğlu(EGE UNIVERSITY, BAYINDIR VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0003-1680-783X
Hülya Akat(MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY, ORTACA VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0002-0927-8530
Cenk Ceyhun Kılıç(EGE UNIVERSITY, BAYINDIR VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0002-8929-2761
Önder Yücel(EGE UNIVERSITY, BAYINDIR VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0001-5097-8435
Pages
—
Publication Date
2019-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Recommendations with regards to ecologically conscious stone garden landscape designing have been made in accordance with the gathered findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, the droughts which have been occurring as a result of global warming, indicate that we need to take serious measures regarding water saving.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based on this, the performances of the texturally and structurally different geotextile materials chosen as samples were tested at the testing grounds at the Ege University Bayındır Vocational Training School Campus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Recommendations with regards to ecologically conscious stone garden landscape designing have been made in accordance with the gathered findings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geotextile · technical textiles · stone garden

Abstract

In recent years, the droughts which have been occurring as a result of global warming, indicate that we need to take serious measures regarding water saving. Contributing to the preservation of the ecological equilibrium by creating environmentally conscious projects in landscape design confronts us as a requirement of professional discipline. In this regard, the necessity to gravitate towards uses which can save water instead of wide grass fields becomes obvious. Stone garden designs, which we encounter in this very moment, present an environmentally friendly alternative to aquatic gardens. It is thought that, alongside saving water with stone garden designs, the geotextile materials used in these designs would prevent the stones sinking into soil as well as preventing the occurrence of weed, hence lessening the usage of chemicals thus generating gains with regards to decreasing soil pollution. Based on this, the performances of the texturally and structurally different geotextile materials chosen as samples were tested at the testing grounds at the Ege University Bayındır Vocational Training School Campus. Recommendations with regards to ecologically conscious stone garden landscape designing have been made in accordance with the gathered findings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çakar, H., Saraçoğlu, Ö. A., Akat, H., Kılıç, C. C., Yücel, Ö. (2019). THE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF GEOTEXTILE MATERIALS USED FOR IRRIGATION WATER AND WEED CONTROL IN STONE GARDEN LANDSCAPE DESIGN. Textile and Apparel, Volume: 29 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.498314

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Özdizdar A. 2004. T İstanbul Ticaret Odası, Teknik Tekstiller Sektör Araştırması s.32.
  2. Fung W. 2004. Handbook of Technical Textiles 490-522, TheTextile Institute. England.
  3. Saltürk M., 2006, Problem of water in the Middle East and analysis of the problem within the perspective of Turkey, Journal of Security Strategies, Vol:3, 21-38
  4. Kaypak Ş. 2011. Küreselleşme sürecinde sürdürülebilir bir kalkinma i̇çin sürdürülebilir bir çevre. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomi̇k Araştırmalar Dergi̇si 13(20), 19-33.
  5. Knox GW. 2005. Landscape design for water conservation, University of Florida, IFAS Extension, p:3.
  6. Aklanoğlu F. 2007, 18-20 October. Climate change impacts on landscape designaand practices, international conference on climate change and environmental effects (UKİDEK), Konya, Turkey.
  7. Ertop G. 2009. Global warming and xeriscape planning, Ankara University, Thesis of Master, p 164, Ankara.
  8. Evsahibioğlu NA, Akhüzüm T, Çakmak B. 2010. Su yönetimi, su kullaım stratejileri ve sınırı aşan sular, Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği VII. Teknik Kongresi.
  9. Bayramoğlu E, Ertek A, Demirel Ö. 2013. Su tasarrufu amacıyla peyzaj mimarlığı uygulamalarında kısıntılı sulama yaklaşımı, İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi 3(7), 45-53.
  10. Önder S, Polat AT. 2009, 16-18 Haziran. Yeşil alan uygulamalarinda su tasarrufuna yönelik olarak sukkulent yerörtücü bitki türlerinden yararlanma. 1. Ulusal kuraklik ve çölleşme sempozyumu, 480-485. Konya, Turkey.
  11. Lightfoot DR. 1993. The cultural ecology of puebloan pebble-mulch gardens, human ecology 21, 115–143
  12. Anonymous, 2014. Pebble Garden. Web: http://uniquegarden.in/ pebblegarden.html, erişim 11.06.2018.
  13. Anonymous, 2016. Garden Design Ideas With gravels. Architecture and Design. Web: https://www.architecturendesign.net/garden-design-ideas-with-pebbles/ erişim 11.06.2018
  14. Tulukcu E. 2012. Bazı tıbbi bitki tohumlarının çimlenme özelliklerinin tespiti. Tarım bilimleri araştırma dergisi 5(1), 101-103.
  15. Öztekin T, Öztekin S, Oğuz İ. 2008. Tokat-Kazova koşullarında saatlik torak sıcaklıklarının periyodik sinüs dalga eşitliği ile tahmini, Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 1(1), 55-60.
  16. Tonkaz T, Doğan E, Aydemir S. 2007. GAP bölgesi toprak sıcaklıklarının alansal değişimleri ve hava sıcaklığı ile ilişkileri, HR.Ü.Z.F.Dergisi 11(1/2), 55-61.
  17. Ekberli İ, Sarılar Y. 2015. Toprak sıcaklığı ve ısısal yayınımın belirlenmesi. Anadolu Journal Agriculture Science 30, 74-85.
  18. Zibilske LM, Makus DJ. 2009. Black oat cover crop management effects on soil temperature and biological properties on a mollisol in Texas, USA. Geoderma, 149: 379385.
  19. Terrence HB, Hugh ALH. 2011. Fine scale variability in soil extracellular enzyme activity is insensitive to rain events and temperature in a mesic system. Pedobiologia 54, 141–146
  20. Aksak et al., 1995. Toprak Sıcaklığı. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Toprak Bölümü Mezuniyet Çalışması. Adana
  21. Flerchinger GN, Pierson FB. 1997. Modelling plant canopy effects on variability of soil temperature and water: model calibration and validation. Journal of Arid Environments 35, 641-653
  22. Altınbaş Ü, Çengel M, Uysal H, Okur B, Okur N, Kurucu Y, Delibacak S. 2004. Toprak Bilimi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No:557, 355.