Journals / Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Housing location choice and residential mobility in the context of residential satisfaction: The case of Bolu city

İkametgâh memnuniyeti bağlamında konut yeri seçimi ve ikametgâh hareketliliği: Bolu kenti örneği

Pages
149–168
Publication Date
2013-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that housing location choice or preference changes in accordance with the socio-economical and demographic indicators of the household in terms of housing mobility in the spatial area of Bolu city.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Residential satisfaction is related to the qualities of housing and neighbourhood, the accessibility of the household to different services and facilities, and economical opportunities and social networks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Housing location choice attitudes of the household, having different socio-economical and demographic structures, play a significant role in the development of urban structure and urban area, and real estate market.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that housing location choice or preference changes in accordance with the socio-economical and demographic indicators of the household in terms of housing mobility in the spatial area of Bolu city.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Behavioural geography · residential satisfaction · housing location choice

Abstract

Residential satisfaction is related to the qualities of housing and neighbourhood, the accessibility of the household to different services and facilities, and economical opportunities and social networks. Morever, with the development of urbanization, the choice of housing location and the attitudes of the household in choosing the location have become an important subject which is evaluated in the housing and real estate market. Housing location choice attitudes of the household, having different socio-economical and demographic structures, play a significant role in the development of urban structure and urban area, and real estate market. The aim of this article is to empirically analyze the effective determinants (or factor) in the choice of housing location with respect to household mobility in the context of residential satisfaction in a medium-sized city. In accordance with this aim, housing location choice is estimated by the behavioural model and statistical (factor, regression and variant) analysis which were obtained by using the data set based on the questionnaires selected by snowball households in the sample area of Bolu city. The results show that housing location choice or preference changes in accordance with the socio-economical and demographic indicators of the household in terms of housing mobility in the spatial area of Bolu city. This change was determined to be effective of household the education, salary, the ownership of the property and the age of the head of the household. In conclusion, socio-economical and demographic factors are effective in housing location choice in the context of residential satisfaction in Turkey in general

Özet

İkametgâh memnuniyeti, konut ve semtin özellikleri, hane halkının çeşitli hizmet ve olanaklara erişebilirliği, ekonomik fırsatlar ve sosyal ağlarla ilişkilidir. Memnuniyet, kentleşmenin gelişimiyle birlikte konut alanı yer seçimi ve hane halkının yer seçimi davranışları konut veya emlak piyasası içerisinde değerlendirilen önemli bir konudur. Farklı sosyo-ekonomik ve demografik yapıdaki hane halkının yer seçimi davranışları, kentsel yapı ve alanının gelişimi ile emlak piyasası içerisinde önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı, Türkiye’de, orta ölçekli bir kentte ikametgâh memnuniyeti bağlamında hane halkının taşınmayı düşünmesi durumunda hangi belirleyici unsurların konut yeri seçiminde etkili olduğunu ampirik olarak analiz etmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda konut yeri seçimi Bolu kenti örneklem alanında kartopu yöntemiyle hane halkına yapılan anketlere dayalı veri seti kullanılarak oluşturulan davranışsal model, faktör, regresyon ve varyans analizi ile tahmin edilmiş ve bu analizlerden elde edilen ampirik bulgular, kentsel mekandaki hane halkının taşınmayı düşünmesi durumunda, sosyo-ekonomik ve demografik göstergelerine göre konut yer seçimi ya da tercihinin de değiştiğini ortaya koymuştur. Bu değişimde hane halkının eğitim, gelir düzeyi, konutun mülkiyet sahipliği ve hane halkı reisi yaşının etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlar, genel olarak Türkiye’de ikametgâh memnuniyeti bağlamında hane halkının taşınmayı düşünmesi durumunda sosyo-ekonomik ve demografik unsurların konut yeri seçiminde etkili olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

M., R. K., ÖZGÜR, E. (2013). Housing location choice and residential mobility in the context of residential satisfaction: The case of Bolu city. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 149–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/163718

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Alkay, E. (2011). The Residential Mobility Pattern in the lstanbul Metropolitan Area. Housing Studies, 26(4), 521—539. Alonso, W. (1964). Location and Land Use. Cambridge: Harward University Press.
  2. Amerigo, M., Aragones, J.I. (1990). Residential satisfaction in council housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 13—325. Amerigo, M., Aragones,.I. (1997). theorical and methodological approach to the study 0f residential satisfaction. Journal ofEnvironmental Psychology, 17, 47—57. Amole, D. (2009). Residential satisfaction in students’ housing, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 76— 85. Baillie, S.T., Peart, V. (1992). Determinants of housing satisfaction for older married and unmarried women in Florida. Housing and Society, 19 (2), 101—116. Baker, E. (2003). Public Housing Tenant Relocation: Residental Mobility, Satisfaction, and the Development 0f enant's Spatial Decision Support System, Ph.Doc.Thesis, The Adelaide University Departement of Geographical and Environmental Studies, Adelaide, Australia. Berköz, L. (2008). lstanbul’da korunakll tek aile konutları: Konut kalitesi ve kullanıcı menmuniyetinin belirlenmesi, İTÜ Dergisi 7(1), 110—124. Bonvalet, C., Carpenter,., White, P. (1995). The Residential Mobility of Ethnic Minorities: Longitudinal Analysis. Urban Studies, 32(1), 87—103. Brown, L.A., Moore, E.G. (1970). The intra—urban migration process: perspective. Geografiska Annaler, Series 53,1—13. Brueckner, J.K. (1987). The Structure of Urban Equilibria: Unified Treatment of The Muth Mills Model, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 2, 821—845 Büyüköztürk,Ş., Çakmak,E.K., Akgün,Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Bruch E.E., Mare, R.D. (2006) Neighborhood choice and neighborhood change. American Journal of Sociology, 112 (3), 667 709. Bruin, M.]., Cook, C.C. (1997). Understanding constraints and residential satisfaction among low—income single—parent families Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 532—553. Burrows, R., Rhodes, D. (2000). The Geography of Misery: Area Disadvantage and Patterns of Neighbourhood Dissatisfaction in England. In J. Bradshaw and R. Sainsbury (eds) Researching Poverty, Aldershot: Ashgate. Cadwallader, M. (1992). Migration and residential mobility: Macro and micro approaches. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. Carp,F.M., Christensen,D.L. (1986). Technical Environmental Assessment Predictors of Residential Satisfaction. Study of Elderly Women Livi