Journals / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Investigation of Posterior Shoulder Tightness on Scapular Dyskinesis

Pages
237–242
Publication Date
2020-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The findings of the study showed that there was no association between posterior shoulder tightness and scapular dyskinesis in asymptomatic individuals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: It has been theorized that posterior shoulder tightness may contribute to scapular dyskinesis; however, it is not yet clear.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This was a cross-sectional study including 121 male participants 242 shoulders .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The findings of the study showed that there was no association between posterior shoulder tightness and scapular dyskinesis in asymptomatic individuals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:shoulder · scapula · kinematics

Abstract

Purpose: It has been theorized that posterior shoulder tightness may contribute to scapular dyskinesis; however, it is not yet clear. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between posterior shoulder tightness and scapular dyskinesis in asymptomatic individuals. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study including 121 male participants 242 shoulders . Scapular dyskinesis was identified by the Scapular Dyskinesis Test, and the participants were grouped as ‘dyskinesis’ and ‘no dyskinesis’ on the dominant and non-dominant sides. Posterior shoulder tightness was assessed by measuring glenohumeral horizontal adduction. Results: Dyskinesis was detected in 67.8% of participants. The mean angles of posterior shoulder tightness in individuals with and without dyskinesis on the dominant side were 35.23 SD 7.50 and 35.43 SD 8.17 degrees, respectively. On the non-dominant side, the mean angles of posterior shoulder tightness were 39.26 SD 8.70 and 38.41 SD 8.50 degrees in individuals with and without dyskinesis, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in posterior shoulder tightness between the groups p>0.05 . Conclusion: The findings of the study showed that there was no association between posterior shoulder tightness and scapular dyskinesis in asymptomatic individuals.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİNOĞLU, E., KARADİBAK, D. (2020). Investigation of Posterior Shoulder Tightness on Scapular Dyskinesis. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 237–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/163503

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Kibler WB, Ludewig PM, McClure PW, Michener LA, Bak K, Sciascia AD. Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: The 2013 consensus statement from the “scapular summit”. Br J Sports Med 2013;47:877–885. [CrossRef] 2. Kibler WB, Sciascia A, Wilkes T. Scapular Dyskinesis and Its Relation to Shoulder Injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012;20:364–372. [CrossRef] 3. Paine R, Voight ML. The role of the scapula. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2013;8:617–629. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC3811730/ 4. McClure PW, Michener LA, Sennett BJ, Karduna AR. Direct 3-dimensional measurement of scapular kinematics during dynamic movements in vivo. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2001;10:269–277. [CrossRef] 5. Ludewig PM, Phadke V, Braman JP, Hassett DR, Cieminski CJ, LaPrade RF. Motion of the shoulder complex during multiplanar humeral elevation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:378–389. [CrossRef] 6. Kibler WB, Sciascia A. Current concepts: scapular dyskinesis. Br J Sports Med 2010;44:300–305. [CrossRef] 7. Ludewig PM, Reynolds JF. The Association of Scapular Kinematics and Glenohumeral Joint Pathologies. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 2009;39:90–104. [CrossRef] 8. Clarsen B, Bahr R, Andersson SH, Munk R, Myklebust G. Reduced glenohumeral rotation, external rotation weakness and scapular dyskinesis are risk factors for shoulder injuries among elite male handball players: A prospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med 2014;48:1327–1333. [CrossRef] 9. Michener LA, McClure PW, Karduna AR. Anatomical and biomechanical mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18:369–379. [CrossRef] 10. Weiser WM, Lee TQ, McMaster WC, McMahon PJ. Effects of simulated scapular protraction on anterior glenohumeral stability. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:801–805. [CrossRef] 11. Kikuchi K, Itoi E, Yamamoto N, et al. Scapular inclination and glenohumeral joint stability: A cadaveric study. J Orthop Sci 2008;13:72–77. [CrossRef] 12. Hickey D, Solvig V, Cavalheri V, Harrold M, Mckenna L. Scapular dyskinesis increases the risk of future shoulder pain by 43% in asymptomatic athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2018;52:102–110. [CrossRef] 13. Pluim BM. Scapular dyskinesis: Practical applications. Br J Sports Med 2013;47:875–876. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bjsports-2013-092722 14. Tyler TF, Nicholas SJ, Roy T, Gleim GW. Quantification of Posterior Capsule Tightness and Motion Loss in Patients with Shoulder Impingement. Am J Sports Med 2000;28:6