Journals / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Magnetically Responsive Trimethyl Chitosan and Chitosan Nanoparticles for Gemcitabine Delivery With in Vitro Studies

Pages
249–257
Publication Date
2020-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, it was suggested that trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles had greater potential than chitosan nanoparticles for further analysis as a magnetically targeted therapy agent for lung cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Gemcitabine is nucleoside analogue and used for various carcinomas like non-small cell lung cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Magnetic nanoparticles can be concentrated at cancerous tissue which provide targeted cancer therapy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, it was suggested that trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles had greater potential than chitosan nanoparticles for further analysis as a magnetically targeted therapy agent for lung cancer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:chitosan · trimethyl chitosan · gemcitabine

Abstract

Purpose: Gemcitabine is nucleoside analogue and used for various carcinomas like non-small cell lung cancer. Nanoparticle-based therapeutic agents have been developed for use in cancer therapy. Trimethyl chitosan TMC is methylated derivative of chitosan. TMC can be preferable because of the limited solubility of chitosan. Magnetic nanoparticles can be concentrated at cancerous tissue which provide targeted cancer therapy. In this study, we tried to develop and compare magnetically targeted trimethyl chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles for gemcitabine delivery in lung cancer therapy. Methods: Chitosan was trimethylated using methyl iodide. Magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized using co-precipitation method. TMC and chitosan nanoparticles were prepared by cross-linking method with tripolyphosphate. Gemcitabine was loaded onto nanoparticles via adsorption technique. After that characterization studies were performed and in vitro drug release tests were carried out. In order to determine cytotoxicites against A549-luc-C8 and CRL5809 cell lines, MTT assays were performed. Results and conclusion: Trimethylation of chitosan was verified with FTIR analysis. Gemcitabine was loaded with 54.7 and 30.3% on magnetic TMC nanoparticles and chitosan nanoparticles, respectively. According to drug release experiments, both carrier system had controlled drug release profile. IC50 values of gemcitabine loaded magnetic TMC nanoparticles were lower than that of magnetic chitosan nanoparticles. In conclusion, it was suggested that trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles had greater potential than chitosan nanoparticles for further analysis as a magnetically targeted therapy agent for lung cancer.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, A., AK, G., ŞANLIER, S. H. (2020). Comparison of Magnetically Responsive Trimethyl Chitosan and Chitosan Nanoparticles for Gemcitabine Delivery With in Vitro Studies. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 249–257. https://ajindex.com/articles/163492

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Polnok A, Borchard G, Verhoef JC, Sarisuta N, Junginger HE. Influence of methylation process on the degree of quaternization of N-trimethyl chitosan chloride. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004
  2. 77–83. [CrossRef] 2. Verheul RJ, Amidi M, Van der Wal S, van Riet E, Jiskoot W, Hennink WE. Synthesis, characterization and in vitro biological properties of O-methyl free N, N, N-trimethylated chitosan. Biomaterials 2008
  3. 3642–3649. [CrossRef] 3. Sandri G, Bonferoni MC, Rossi S, et al. Nanoparticles based on N-trimethylchitosan: Evaluation of absorption properties using in vitro (Caco-2 cells) and ex vivo (excised rat jejunum) models. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007
  4. 68–77. [CrossRef] 4. Kulkarni AD, Patel HM, Surana SJ, Vanjari YH, Belgamwar VS, Pardeshi CV. N, N, N-Trimethyl chitosan: An advanced polymer with myriad of opportunities in nanomedicine. Carbohydrate Polymers 2016
  5. 875–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.041 5. Alvarellos ML, Lamba J, Sangkuhl K, et al. PharmGKB summary
  6. Gemcitabine Pathway. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2014
  7. 564–574. [CrossRef] 6. Doğaç Yİ, Teke M. Immobılızatıon of bovıne catalase onto magnetıc nanopartıcles. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 2013
  8. 750–765. [CrossRef] 7. Amidi M, Romeijn SG, Borchard G, Junginger HE, Hennink WE, Jiskoot W. Preparation and characterization of protein-loaded N-trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles as nasal delivery system. J Control Release 2006
  9. 107–116. [CrossRef] 8. Mourya VK, Inamdar NN. Trimethyl chitosan and its applications in drug delivery. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008
  10. 1057–1079. [CrossRef] 9. Chen F, Zhang ZR, Yuan F, Qin X, Wang M, Huang Y. In vitro and in vivo study of N-trimethyl chitosan nanoparticles for oral protein delivery. Int J Pharm 2008
  11. 226–233. [CrossRef] 10. Bulmer C, Margaritis A, Xenocostas A. Production and characterization of novel chitosan nanoparticles for controlled release of rHuErythropoietin. Biochem Eng J 2012
  12. 61–69. [CrossRef] 11. Garg NK, Dwivedi P, Campbell C, Tyagi RK. Site specific/targeted delivery of gemcitabine through anisamide anchored chitosan/ poly ethylene glycol nanoparticles: An understanding of lung cancer therapeutic intervention. Eur J Pharm Sci 2012
  13. 1006–1014. [CrossRef] 12. Derakhshandeh K, Fathi S. Role of chitosan nanoparticles in the oral absorption of Gemcitabine. Int J Pharm 2012
  14. 172–177. [CrossRef] 13. Hamarat Şanlıer Ş, Ak G, Yılmaz H, et al. Development of ultrasoundtriggered and magnetic-targeted nanobubble system for dual-drug d