SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Agricultural Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 28 Issue: 3

The Role of Different Planting Types in Mitigating Urban Heat Island Effects: A Case Study of Gaziantep, Turkey

Murat Yücekaya(Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi)0000-0003-2072-712X
Ahmet Salih Günaydın(İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5799-0445
Pages
—
Publication Date
2022-09-05
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, it was found out that the highest cooling effect was achieved in the planting plan created at 4 m intervals using coniferous plants.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The growth of cities and increase in their structural density lead to several problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The most important of these is the formation of urban heat islands and the decrease in the bioclimatic comfort levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, it was found out that the highest cooling effect was achieved in the planting plan created at 4 m intervals using coniferous plants.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Envi-MET · outdoor thermal comfort · urban heat island

Abstract

The growth of cities and increase in their structural density lead to several problems. The most important of these is the formation of urban heat islands and the decrease in the bioclimatic comfort levels. This study focuses on the effect of different planting alternatives on bioclimatic comfort. In this context, different planting options with only leafy, only coniferous, leafy and coniferous at half at 4 m, 6 m, and 8 m intervals along with the current planting state of the study area in Gaziantep, Turkey were prepared. These plans were simulated with ENVI-met software. As a result of the study, coniferous plants were observed to have a cooling effect of approximately 2 °C – 2.5 °C compared to the leafy ones. In the simulation results of the map obtained with coniferous mixed plants, it was determined that the cooling effect values of only coniferous and only leafy plants were at almost average. Relative humidity was 15% higher in the plan conducted with coniferous plants compared to leafy plants. It was about 8% higher than leafy ones in mixed planning. There was no significant change in wind speed maps. In the plans with 4 m intervals on average radiation temperature maps, the refreshing effect of the coniferous was more than the leafy. As a result of the study, it was found out that the highest cooling effect was achieved in the planting plan created at 4 m intervals using coniferous plants.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yücekaya, M., Günaydın, A. S. (2022). The Role of Different Planting Types in Mitigating Urban Heat Island Effects: A Case Study of Gaziantep, Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Volume: 28 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.898103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Altunkasa, F., 1987. Çukurova bölgesinde biyoklimatik veriler kullanılarak açık ve yeşil alan sistemlerinin belirlenmesi ilkeleri üzerinde bir araştırma (Doktora Tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
  2. Armson, D., Stringer, P., Ennos, A.R., 2012. The effect of tree shade and grass on surface and globe temperatures in an urban area. Urban For. Urban Green. 11, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.05.002
  3. Attia, S., Duchhart, I., 2011. Bioclimatic landscape design in extremely hot and arid climates. Presented at the Proceedings of 27th Conference of Passive and Low Energy Architecture (PLEA) 2011, PLEA, Belgium.
  4. Bowler, D.E., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T.M., Pullin, A.S., 2010. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landsc. Urban Plan. 97, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
  5. Brown, R.D., 2010. Design with microclimate: the secret to comfortable outdoor spaces. Island Press, Washington.
  6. Bruse, M., 2007. Simulating Human Thermal Comfort and Resulting Usage Patterns of Urban Open Spaceswith a Multi-agent System. Presented at the Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Singapore, pp. 699–706.
  7. Ca, V.T., Asaeda, T., Abu, E.M., 1998. Reductions in air conditioning energy caused by a nearby park. Energy Build. 29, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00032-2
  8. Chatzidimitriou, A., Yannas, S., 2004. Microclimatic Studies of Urban Open Spaces in Northern Greece. Presented at the Plea2004 - The 21st Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, pp. 1–6.
  9. Dimoudi, A., Nikolopoulou, M., 2003. Vegetation in the urban environment: microclimatic analysis and benefits. Energy Build. 35, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00081-6
  10. Gaitani, N., Mihalakakou, G., Santamouris, M., 2007. On the use of bioclimatic architecture principles in order to improve thermal comfort conditions in outdoor spaces. Build. Environ. 42, 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.018
  11. Givoni, B., 1998. Climate considerations in building and urban design. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
  12. Gunawardena, K.R., Wells, M.J., Kershaw, T., 2017. Utilising green and bluespace to mitigate urban heat island intensity. Sci. Total Environ. 584–585, 1040–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.158
  13. Karatasou, S., Santamouris, M., Geros, V., 2006. Urban Building Climatology, in: Environmental Design of Urban Buildings: An Integrated Approach. Earthscan, London; Sterling, VA, p. 322.
  14. Latini, G., Cocci Grifoni, R., Tascini, S., 2010. Thermal Comfort and Microclimates in Open Spaces. Presented at the Buildings XI: Thermal Performance of Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings, ASHRAE.
  15. Miraboğlu, M., 1977. Ormanın Hava Kirliliğini Önleyici Etkisi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi, İstanbul; Çelikcilt Matbaası.
  16. Ng, E., Chen, L., Wang, Y., Yuan, C., 2012. A study on the cooling effects of greening in a high-density city: An experience from Hong Kong. Build. Environ. 47, 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.014
  17. Oke, T.R., 1987. Boundary layer climates, 2nd ed. ed. Methuen, London; New York.
  18. Papangelis, G., Tombrou, M., Dandou, A., Kontos, T., 2012. An urban “green planning” approach utilizing the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) modeling system. A case study of Athens, Greece. Landsc. Urban Plan. 105, 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.014
  19. Petralli, M., Massetti, L., Orlandini, S., 2009. Air Temperature Distribution in an Urban Park: Differences Between Open-Field and Below a Canopy. Presented at the e Urban on Conference International seventh T, Yokohama, Japan.
  20. Potchter, O., Cohen, P., Bitan, A., 2006. Climatic behavior of various urban parks during hot and humid summer in the mediterranean city of Tel Aviv, Israel. Int. J. Climatol. 26, 1695–1711. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1330
  21. Shashua-Bar, L., Pearlmutter, D., Erell, E., 2011. The influence of trees and grass on outdoor thermal comfort in a hot-arid environment. Int. J. Climatol. 31, 1498–1506. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2177
  22. Srivanit, M., Hokao, K., 2013. Evaluating the cooling effects of greening for improving the outdoor thermal environment at an institutional campus in the summer. Build. Environ. 66, 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.04.012
  23. Türkeş, M., 2010. Klimatoloji ve Meteoroloji. Kriter Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  24. Walikewitz, N., Jänicke, B., Langner, M., Meier, F., Endlicher, W., 2015. The difference between the mean radiant temperature and the air temperature within indoor environments: A case study during summer conditions. Build. Environ. 84, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.004
  25. Wang, Y., Akbari, H., 2014. 3D Simulation Analysis of Urban Micro-Climates to Inform Heat Island Mitigation Policies in Cold Climates. Presented at the Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, ACEEE, Washington, D.C., pp. 353–364.
  26. Yahia, M.W., Johansson, E., 2014. Landscape interventions in improving thermal comfort in the hot dry city of Damascus, Syria—The example of residential spaces with detached buildings. Landsc. Urban Plan. 125, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.014
  27. Yang, F., Lau, S.S.Y., Qian, F., 2011. Thermal comfort effects of urban design strategies in high-rise urban environments in a sub-tropical climate. Archit. Sci. Rev. 54, 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2011.613646
  28. Yu, C., Hien, W.N., 2006. Thermal benefits of city parks. Energy Build. 38, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.04.003
  29. Karatasou, S., Santamouris, M., Geros, V., 2006. Urban Building Climatology, in: Environmental Design of Urban Buildings: An Integrated Approach. Earthscan, London; Sterling, VA, p. 322.
  30. Oke, T.R., 1987. Boundary layer climates, 2nd ed. ed. Methuen, London; New York.